bpo-44662: Add ability to annotate types.Union #27214
Conversation
|
@Fidget-Spinner Could you please review this PR? |
|
Please wait until Serhiy merges some of his union refactoring changes. He's already prepared them, just not yet made PRs for review and merge. This will also take some time for me to review as I need to revise on Also the current issue is getting too big. Can you please create a separate issue for this on bpo then tie this PR to that? We are getting pretty far from my original issue on the bpo ;). |
|
I created separate issue at issue tracker. |
|
@Fidget-Spinner I have merged Serhiy changes. Could you please review this PR? |
|
Can you please split the PR into two? It seems it's fixing pickling and |
|
Sorry about that, I thought that it will be a great idea to fix several issues in scope of one PR. I will divide it at 2 separate PR. |
|
@Fidget-Spinner This PR contains only |
No worries. Thanks for separating them. It's much clearer to me now. |
|
Looks good, I'll nosy a few others in too in case I missed something. |
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Core and Builtins/2021-07-17-13-41-58.bpo-44662.q22kWR.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
….q22kWR.rst Co-authored-by: Ken Jin <28750310+Fidget-Spinner@users.noreply.github.com>
https://bugs.python.org/issue44662