Update events-that-trigger-workflows.md#650
Conversation
|
Thanks for opening this pull request! A GitHub docs team member should be by to give feedback soon. In the meantime, please check out the contributing guidelines. |
|
Thanks so much for opening a PR @cmcaine! I'll get this triaged for review 🌟 |
|
👋 @cmcaine Thanks a lot for this PR! You are correct that the description doesn't really match the example. However, I think we can change it so that the behavior is clearer, rather than switching the required values for the fields. I'll submit a new commit to your PR so it hopefully makes more sense! |
|
Ok, change made in 6bfe64d You can see a preview here: https://docs-650--patch-1.herokuapp.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/actions/reference/events-that-trigger-workflows#example-workflow-configuration @cmcaine: Let me know if this makes sense for you as well, and I'll merge it in 🙂 |
|
That looks like an improvement :) but line 114 setting the default name should maybe be removed if a name is required? Or maybe default & required is fine? |
Yep, default & required is fine 🙂. For the UI, this results in the field being pre-populated with the default value. e.g.: I'll get this merged in! |
|
Thanks very much for contributing! Your pull request has been merged 🎉 You should see your changes appear on the site in approximately 24 hours. |
|
But what is the difference between In both cases it is impossible to submit an empty string, because it will be replaced by the default, right? So what does On a field without a default, |
|
Co-authored-by: Jacob Prall <prall.jacob@gmail.com>

Why:
The wrong field is
requiredin theworkflow_dispatchevent example.The text says:
But
nameis required andlocationis not required and has no default.What:
Make
nameoptional andlocationrequired.Check off the following:
I have not done any of these, this is a trivial change and your CI should catch issues :)