skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557265acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Designing usable web forms: empirical evaluation of web form improvement guidelines

Published: 26 April 2014 Publication History

Abstract

This study reports a controlled eye tracking experiment (N = 65) that shows the combined effectiveness of 20 guidelines to improve interactive online forms when applied to forms found on real company websites. Results indicate that improved web forms lead to faster completion times, fewer form submission trials, and fewer eye movements. Data from subjective questionnaires and interviews further show increased user satisfaction. Overall, our findings highlight the importance for web designers to improve their web forms using UX guidelines.

References

[1]
Aeberhard, A. (2011). FUS - Form Usability Scale. Development of a Usability Measuring Tool for Online Forms. Unpublished master's thesis. University of Basel, Switzerland.
[2]
Al-Saleh, M., Al-Wabil, A., Al-Attas, E., AlAbdulkarim, A., Chaurasia, M., Alfaifi, R. (2012). Inline immediate feedback in arabic web forms: An eye tracking study of transactional tasks. In Proc. IIT 2012, 333--338.
[3]
Bargas-Avila, J. A., Brenzikofer, O., Tuch, A. N., Roth, S. P., & Opwis, K. (2011a). Working towards usable forms on the World Wide Web: Optimizing date entry input fields. Advances in Human Computer Interaction, Article ID 202701.
[4]
Bargas-Avila, J. A., Brenzikofer, O., Tuch, A. N., Roth, S. P., & Opwis, K. (2011b). Working towards usable forms on the World Wide Web: Optimizing multiple selection interface elements. Advances in Human Computer Interaction, Article ID 347171.
[5]
Bargas-Avila, J.A., Oberholzer, G., Schmutz, P., de Vito, M. & Opwis, K. (2007). Usable Error Message Presentation in the World Wide Web: Don't Show Errors Right Away. Interacting with Computers, 19, 330--341.
[6]
Bargas-Avila, J. A., Orsini, S., Piosczyk, H., Urwyler, D., & Opwis, K. (2010a). Enhancing online forms: Use format Specifications for fields with format restrictions to help respondents, Interacting with Computers, 23(1), 33--39.
[7]
Bargas-Avila, J. A, Brenzikofer, O., Roth, S., Tuch, A. N., Orsini, S., & Opwis, K. (2010b). Simple but Crucial User Interfaces in the World Wide Web: Introducing 20 Guidelines for Usable Web Form Design. In: R. Matrai (Ed.), User Interfaces, 1--10. InTech.
[8]
Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A Quick and Dirty Usability Scale. In: P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability Evaluation in Industry (pp. 189--194). London: Taylor & Francis.
[9]
Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (Eds.) (1983). The psychology of human computer interaction. Routledge.
[10]
Christian, L., Dillman, D., & Smyth, J. (2007). Helping respondents get it right the first time: the influence of words, symbols, and graphics in web surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(1), 113 - 125.
[11]
Couper, M., Tourangeau, R., Conrad, F., & Crawford, S. (2004). What they see is what we get: response options for web surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 22(1), 111--127.
[12]
Field, A. (2009). Non-parametric tests. In Discovering statistics using SPSS (third edition., pp. 539--583). London: SAGE.
[13]
Duchowski, A. T. (2007). Eye tracking methodology: Theory and practice (Vol. 373). Springer.
[14]
Harms, J. (2013). Research Goals for Evolving the "Form" User Interface Metaphor towards more Interactivity. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7946, 819--822.
[15]
Hart, S., & Staveland, L. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.). Human mental workload (pp. 139--183). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
[16]
Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & Van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford University Press.
[17]
Idrus, Z., Razak, N. H. A., Talib, N. H. A., & Tajuddin, T. (2010). Using Three Layer Model (TLM) in web form design: WeFDeC checklist development. Computer Engineering and Applications (ICCEA), 385389.
[18]
James, J., Beaumont, A., Stephens, J., Ullman, C. (2002). Usable Forms for the Web. Glasshaus, Krefeld.
[19]
Jarrett, C. & Ganey, G. (2008). Forms that work: Designing web forms for usability. Morgan Kaufmann.
[20]
Karousos, N., Katsanos, C., Tselios, N., & Xenos, M. (2013). Effortless tool-based evaluation of web form filling tasks using keystroke level model and fitts law. In CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1851--1856. ACM.
[21]
Koyani, S. (2006). Research-based web design & usability guidelines. US General Services Administration, Washington.
[22]
Lewis, J. R. (1991). Psychometric evaluation of an after-scenario questionnaire for computer usability studies: The ASQ. SIGCHI Bulletin, 23(1), 78--81.
[23]
Money, A. G., Fernando, S., Elliman, T., & Lines, L. (2010). A trial protocol for evaluating assistive online forms for older adults. Proc. ECIS, Paper 90.
[24]
Nielsen, J. (2005). Sixty Guidelines From 1986 Revisited. http://www.nngroup.com/articles/ sixty-guidelines-from-1986-revisited/
[25]
Nielsen, J., & Pernice, K. (2010). Eyetracking web usability. New Riders.
[26]
Pauwels, S. L., Hübscher, C., Leuthold, S., BargasAvila, J. A. & Opwis, K. (2009). Error prevention in online forms: Use color instead of asterisks to mark required fields. Interacting with Computers, 21(4), 257262.
[27]
Rukzio, E., Hamard, J., Noda, C., & De Luca, A. (2006). Visualization of Uncertainty in Context Aware Mobile Applications. In Proc. MobileHCI'06, 247--250.
[28]
Seckler, M., Heinz, S., Bargas-Avila, J.A., Opwis, K., & Tuch, A.N. (2013). Empirical evaluation of 20 web form optimization guidelines. In Proc. CHI '13, 18931898.
[29]
Seckler, M., Tuch, A. N., Opwis, K., & Bargas-Avila, J. A. (2012). User-friendly Locations of Error Messages in Web Forms: Put them on the right side of the erroneous input field. Interacting with Computers, 24(3), 107--118.
[30]
Tullis, T., Pons, A., 1997. Designating required vs. optional input fields. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM New York, NY, USA, pp. 259--26
[31]
Wroblewski, L. (2008). Web Form Design: Filling in the Blanks. Rosenfeld Media.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Learning-based Relaxation of Completeness Requirements for Data Entry FormsACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/363570833:3(1-32)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2024
  • (2023)User Perceptions and Preferences for Online Surveys in American Sign Language: An Exploratory StudyProceedings of the 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3597638.3608444(1-17)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2023
  • (2022)Improving the interface of an e-commerce website by applying universal design principlesJournal of Computer Sciences Institute10.35784/jcsi.301925(337-344)Online publication date: 30-Dec-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Designing usable web forms: empirical evaluation of web form improvement guidelines

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2014
        4206 pages
        ISBN:9781450324731
        DOI:10.1145/2556288
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 26 April 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. form evaluation
        2. form guidelines
        3. form interaction
        4. internet
        5. web forms
        6. world wide web

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Conference

        CHI '14
        Sponsor:
        CHI '14: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 26 - May 1, 2014
        Ontario, Toronto, Canada

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 465 of 2,043 submissions, 23%;
        Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)1,119
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)131
        Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)Learning-based Relaxation of Completeness Requirements for Data Entry FormsACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/363570833:3(1-32)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2024
        • (2023)User Perceptions and Preferences for Online Surveys in American Sign Language: An Exploratory StudyProceedings of the 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3597638.3608444(1-17)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2023
        • (2022)Improving the interface of an e-commerce website by applying universal design principlesJournal of Computer Sciences Institute10.35784/jcsi.301925(337-344)Online publication date: 30-Dec-2022
        • (2021)Design and Implementation of an Informatics Infrastructure for Standardized Data Acquisition, Transfer, Storage, and Export in Psychiatric Clinical Routine: Feasibility StudyJMIR Mental Health10.2196/266818:6(e26681)Online publication date: 9-Jun-2021
        • (2021)Adaptive Digital Encounters: An approach for reducing digital impact on outpatient flow2021 2nd Asia Conference on Computers and Communications (ACCC)10.1109/ACCC54619.2021.00032(149-154)Online publication date: Sep-2021
        • (2020)Fill in the BlanksProceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security10.1145/3372297.3417271(507-519)Online publication date: 30-Oct-2020
        • (2020)Tool-mediated HCI modelling instruction: evidence from three studiesBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2020.179066141:1(18-31)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2020
        • (2020)Design guidelines for augmenting short-form videos using animated data visualizationsJournal of Visualization10.1007/s12650-020-00644-zOnline publication date: 20-Apr-2020
        • (2020)User Experience Improvement for Online Travel Agencies Through Eye-Tracking: The Onlineweg.de Case StudyEye Tracking in Tourism10.1007/978-3-030-49709-5_9(113-135)Online publication date: 2-Oct-2020
        • (2019)Form Feedback on the Web: A Comparison of Popup Alerts and In-Form Error MessagesInnovation in Medicine and Healthcare Systems, and Multimedia10.1007/978-981-13-8566-7_35(369-379)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2019
        • Show More Cited By

        View Options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Get Access

        Login options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media