A report from OSCON 2007

O'Reilly's annual OSCON in Portland, Ore., is perhaps the only major conference in North America that spans the entire spectrum of open-source communities. This makes it a great opportunity to learn from people who may be encountering the same sorts of problems in a vastly different environment. Other events such as FOSDEM or LCA already provide this kind of environment, but for those of us who are US-based, it's helpful to have one with a lower travel budget. I highly recommend giving a talk if you're going so you get in free, though, since registration costs hover around US$1000 and up. It's clearly not a nonprofit conference.

Numerous groups met preceding the main part of the conference, one of them a group of people involved with running a variety of free/open-source projects. At the foundations summit, most of the discussion centered around dealing with the issues facing nonprofits, such as trademarks, fundraising and bookkeeping. But in the same way as a full conference, the "hallway track" here was the most useful. As the number of people grows, the discussion gets slower and slower, but meeting the people involved with other foundations is invaluable. The summit ended Tuesday, and next day, the exhibit hall and regular sessions began.

In his session, Arjan van de Ven talked about efforts to reduce power use, focusing on a few main problems to avoid in your code. The first, not surprisingly, was polling. There is no excuse for polling, with the advent of things like inotify. He said, "Frequent polling causes spattergroit."

His second enemy was timers. It costs power to keep moving your CPU in and out of idle states, so you want to group timer events together rather than having them randomly spread throughout time by a number of programs. On the kernel side, you can use round_jiffies() or round_jiffies_relative(), and in userland, you can use glib's g_timeout_add_seconds() — not g_timeout_add(). Some work is underway to add this functionality to glibc as well. You don't want the entire Internet doing this at the same time, however, so each computer must group its events at a slightly different time.

Arjan's final enemy was disk I/O. Since disks have moving parts, they consume a lot of power (at least until solid-state disks grow more common). High-speed links such as SATA and SCSI also eat power when not in power-saving mode. Gotchas here include opening files, even when in cache, because of the access time update (use the O_NOATIME flag to open() when possible), and looking for files or directories that don't exist (even when using inotify, this always goes to disk).

A special case of this is media playback. The key is avoiding constant spinups of DVDs as well as hard drives by using large buffers — Arjan suggested 20 minutes of video or a minute of audio. Also, decode in large batches so you can be idle longer.

Tools such as powertop and strace are key in tracking down the culprits. Powertop can tell you where to look, and strace can tell you more about what any programs are doing. Near the end, Arjan showed a graph of how tuning and recent fixes dropped a Fedora 7 default installation from a power consumption of 21W down to about 15.5W. That just a few fixes dropped it by so much shows how broken things were, but we're now on the right track. A good goal is to aim for 50 or less wakeups a second, because getting below that level generally doesn't gain you much more.

A man with the job title "Disruptive Innovator" gave a talk with about 550 slides in 45 minutes. Rolf Skyberg of Ebay applied Maslow's hierarchy of needs to technology to try to explain how users behave. The first level is survival, the second is security, and the third is belonging. Computer programs apparently haven't managed to get any higher up on the scale yet. In terms of programs, survival means the program runs without segfaults; security means the program is useful; and belonging means the program is pretty. The more energy users spend finding the basics (help, logging in, etc.), the less they have to spend doing something useful. But one thing worth remembering is that people using a program may have higher needs than you expected. For example, the iPod isn't just useful, it's pretty. And people really care about that prettiness despite the lack of features like an FM transmitter, a recorder, etc. that many other, less popular MP3 players have.

Luke Kanies talked about Puppet, a server automation tool he wrote in Ruby. It's a replacement for earlier popular tools such as cfengine. He really promoted the architecture, because any component in the entire system can be replaced and reused separately. Puppet's made of three main layers: server, networking and client. The server layer contains a compiler, a file server, a certificate authority and a report handler. The networking is XMLRPC over HTTPS. The client layer includes a resource abstraction layer, transactions and a resource server. Each of these individual components can be ripped out and replaced if you don't like it. You could change the configuration language, use a different method of communication, or whatever else your heart desires.

The resource abstraction layer contrasts the most with other tools such as cfengine. It abstracts all the concepts like "install a package," "add a user," "add a group" and so forth so you can run Puppet on any Linux or other Unix-like OS and retain a simple configuration file without OS-specific details. The layer supports about 10 different distributions and other operating systems, and it's not difficult to add more.

Work is underway to create a library of Puppet config files (or recipes) to reduce all the duplication, and that should greatly ease adoption of Puppet. Puppet seems like a well-thought-out and extensible tool, so it will be interesting to watch where it goes.

Clinton Nixon talked about dealing with legacy PHP code, but many of the points are generally applicable to refactoring any code. His three primary suggestions were to separate the controller and the view, even if you don't have a solid MVC architecture; to call methods instead of including code that runs from the include file; and to get rid of global variables.

His rules for view code were that control structures, printing, and display-specific, unnested functions were allowed, but assignment and other function calls were prohibited. He suggested beginning by drawing a line at the top of the code and adding a comment that says "view code below here," then gradually migrating controller code above the line until you can move it to a separate file. For loops, encapsulate the variables in an object. Once you've gotten to this point, you may find duplicated views that you can factor out.

Untangling a web of included files is a process of figuring out the inputs and outputs, wrapping the entire file in a method, then refactoring. The nice part about this style of refactoring is that the code always works. There's never a point where you check in the code and it's broken.

Finally, he recommended two books: Working effectively with legacy code, by Michael Feathers, and Refactoring by Martin Fowler. Although the Fowler book is a classic, he recommended the newer book by Feathers because it's more approachable.

At the close of the sessions Thursday, Dave Jones gave his now-infamous "User Space Sucks" talk. Since most people have gotten the basic idea of this talk, I'm only going to mention the new information. Dave re-ran his tests a week ago on Fedora 7 to look at disk I/O during the bootstrap process, and he found that it had actually gotten even worse since FC6. Counts of stat(), open() and exec() calls had either increased or stayed the same. But the problem has grown harder, because the offenders no longer stand out in the same way as the originals.

OSCON always provides some entertaining and educational talks, provided you've got a way to get into them. But its free content isn't too shabby either. The exhibit hall, all of the BOFs and parties (of which there are many), and the accompanying OSCAMP (like FooCamp, BarCamp, etc.) and FOSCON (mostly about Ruby) are all gratis. It stands nearly alone in the U.S. as a conference that spans across all of the open-source world, although a niche certainly exists for a lower-margin meeting like FOSDEM or LCA on this side of the ocean.

Index entries for this article
GuestArticles	Berkholz, Donnie

---

to post comments