There will be a gathering in front of Amnesty International offices in Lonodn at 2:30 pm in solidarity with Ahmad Batebi and other prisoners of conscience in Iran.
I am currently working in Amsterdam so I won't be able to make the gathering in London. My best wishes for all those who will turn up tomorrow.
This weblog was created to act as a platform for the voice of secular pro-democracy activists in and outside Iran who are struggling against the religious dictatorship of the Islamic clerics in Iran. Follow me on https://gettr.com/user/potkazar or My Telegram Channel https://t.me/SledgeHammerNews My favourite quote: "Evil only prevails when the good stay silent"
Tuesday, February 27, 2007
Monday, February 19, 2007
Ahmad Batebi in Hospital
Ahmad Batebi, the Iranian student who was sentenced to 15 years imprisonment during Khatami's presidency, for having raised a bloody T-shirt of a student colleague at a peaceful student protest, was taken to hospital on Friday after going into a coma.
After Khatami was given an honorary doctorate at St. Andrew's university, the Islamic regime felt more emboldened to further ill treat Batebi. He was denied prison visits and leave, and was under constant threat to be transferred to section 8 of the Evin prison alongside dangerous criminals and drug addicts. On Friday, the prison authorities attempted to remove his personal belongings from him. This was like a last straw for Batebi's already frail nerves. He reacted angrily and then suffered convulsions and was unconscious for several hours. Prison authorities transferred him to the prison hospital at first. On Sunday Batebi suffered more convulsions and was taken to Tajrish Martyrs hospital along with six armed guards, while his feet were chained together.
I am still convinced that had the NUS in St. Andrews university insisted on Batebi's release as a pre-condition for Khatami's poxy honorary doctorate, Batebi would now be free and healthy.
I consider the lack of solidarity action by the St.Andrews university NUS, and in particular the cowardliness of the president of the Student Association, Tom D'Ardenne, partly responsible for the present demise of Ahmad Batebi. I hope the St. Andrews student association bear the guilt of what has happened, but then again cowards do not usually have a conscience.
More pictures of Tom D'Ardenne:
Picture 1
Picture 2
After Khatami was given an honorary doctorate at St. Andrew's university, the Islamic regime felt more emboldened to further ill treat Batebi. He was denied prison visits and leave, and was under constant threat to be transferred to section 8 of the Evin prison alongside dangerous criminals and drug addicts. On Friday, the prison authorities attempted to remove his personal belongings from him. This was like a last straw for Batebi's already frail nerves. He reacted angrily and then suffered convulsions and was unconscious for several hours. Prison authorities transferred him to the prison hospital at first. On Sunday Batebi suffered more convulsions and was taken to Tajrish Martyrs hospital along with six armed guards, while his feet were chained together.
I am still convinced that had the NUS in St. Andrews university insisted on Batebi's release as a pre-condition for Khatami's poxy honorary doctorate, Batebi would now be free and healthy.
I consider the lack of solidarity action by the St.Andrews university NUS, and in particular the cowardliness of the president of the Student Association, Tom D'Ardenne, partly responsible for the present demise of Ahmad Batebi. I hope the St. Andrews student association bear the guilt of what has happened, but then again cowards do not usually have a conscience.
More pictures of Tom D'Ardenne:
Picture 1
Picture 2
Wednesday, February 14, 2007
Gathering Outside Islamic Assembly to Stop the Sivand Dam
This morning several hundred Iranians, mainly young, have gathered peacefully outside the Islamic Consultative Assembly (Majlis), under heavy rain in Tehran, to demand the closure of Sivand dam.
More than 20 NGOs including a group of seminary students from Qom, called for the gathering, to try and stop any possible damage to our national heritage in the Bolaghi by-pass and in particular to the tomb of the founder of our country, Cyrus the Great.
More than 20 NGOs including a group of seminary students from Qom, called for the gathering, to try and stop any possible damage to our national heritage in the Bolaghi by-pass and in particular to the tomb of the founder of our country, Cyrus the Great.
Monday, February 12, 2007
IRI uses British Universities as Propaganda Platform
"Note that propaganda is on the top of our agenda. Today's world rotates around propaganda. Note that the highest action that can bear fruits for our revolution here and help its export outside Iran is propaganda. Increasing and widening propaganda outside Iran should be at the top of our programmes". These are quotes from Ayatollah Khomeini on the importance of propaganda.
Whatever one thinks of Ayatollah Khomeini, it would be unfair not to admire his enormous talents in the art of revolution. He knew what levers to pull, and recognised so well the importance of the propaganda lever.
It seems those who carry Ayatollah Khomeini's legacy and represent the interests of the Islamic Republic in UK, have rightly seen the importance of the Western universities, as a useful propaganda platform for strengthening and export of the 1979 revolution. Universities after all will produce the future diplomats, think tank units, journalists, politicians, managers etc.
It is ironic that while secular academics are expelled and forced into early retirement in the Islamic Republic, student activists are imprisoned, and banned from furthering their education, and while actions like "gender rationing" in favour of more university places for male students instead of female students are being considered by the Islamic Republic, secular Western universities rather than restricting the Islamic Republic's political agenda on their campuses, knowingly or unknowingly, provide more and more opportunities for the Islamic Republic to give a rosey picture of a theocratic state.
Take a look at what happened at SOAS last week:
A request was made by an Iranian student at SOAS for a "symposium" about Iranian cinema. Later on an organisation named "Council for the Promotion of Persian Language and Literature" took over the organisation of the event and the "Iranian Cinema Symposium" actually became a pretext for an official celebration of the Islamic Revolution in a British university, organized and sponsored by the Iranian embassy in London.
The "Council for the Promotion of Persian Language and Literature" is actually a front for "Organisation for Islamic Propaganda and Communication" in Iran which amongst its long list of previous activities, printed literature in support and justification of Ayatollah Khomeini's fatwa for the assassination of the British writer, Salman Rushdie.
The official advertising poster for the event did not show the English translation of the Persian text. The English text was kept neutral, but the Persian text was aall about the glorification of the Islamic revolution in 1979.
On the first day of the event, a diplomat from the Iranian embassy in London, acted as the master of ceremony and the event was opened by recitals from the Koran and posters glorifying the Islamic revolution in 1979 were exhibited along with bookstalls disseminating Islamic Republic official literature.
Pictures of this event can be seen here on the Islamic Republic embassy related website:
http://london.icro.ir/?c=newsShow&NewsId=290259&t=4
University officials say that they had not realised the political content of the event, and have expressed their displeasure at such tactics used by the Islamic Republic embassy and have notified the Foreign Office.
Wednesday, February 07, 2007
New Dress Code Restrictions for Female Students
Amir-Kabir University news website reports about new dress code restrictions for female students. A big sign at the gates warns women students that they can only attend the classes if they strictly observe the Islamic dress code.
The website reports the new restrictions were initiated by a young cleric who was recently promoted from deputy representative of the Supreme Leader in the University of Arts to the position of chief representative. During his time as the deputy representative, he had impressed his superiors and secured his promotion by his relentless efforts in encouraging male students to take on female student colleagues as temporary concubine wives - Sigheh.
The website reports the new restrictions were initiated by a young cleric who was recently promoted from deputy representative of the Supreme Leader in the University of Arts to the position of chief representative. During his time as the deputy representative, he had impressed his superiors and secured his promotion by his relentless efforts in encouraging male students to take on female student colleagues as temporary concubine wives - Sigheh.
Friday, February 02, 2007
Iranian Female MP Supports the Bill to Reduce Female Student Numbers
Prior to the 1979 revolution, many religious families in Iran withheld their daughters from further education, fearing the secular universities, where boys and girls were mixed in the same lecture room. After the Islamic revolution however, the universities and other institutes were deemed Islamic and the number of Iranian female students entering higher education saw a steady increase.
The percentage of female to male students for the university entrance exam is now 60/40 in favour of girls. This demographic change is now being blamed by the mullahs for much of the country's social catastrophes, to the extent that a bill is being passed in the parliament to make sure the number of female students does not exceed the number of male students.
Fatemeh Ajorloo, one of the few female MPs, is one of the supporters of the bill. "If we allocate the university places according to the nature of the course and the physical ability required, then it is better for society as a whole. We should not refer to this bill as gender allocation, but gender limitation. We should give consideration to the sanctity of gender in educational courses" Ajorloo stated in an interview with ILNA.
Avaz Heydarpour, another MP who also supports the bill said "If women want to go after science and knowledge they should seek courses that will be useful for them at home"
The percentage of female to male students for the university entrance exam is now 60/40 in favour of girls. This demographic change is now being blamed by the mullahs for much of the country's social catastrophes, to the extent that a bill is being passed in the parliament to make sure the number of female students does not exceed the number of male students.
Fatemeh Ajorloo, one of the few female MPs, is one of the supporters of the bill. "If we allocate the university places according to the nature of the course and the physical ability required, then it is better for society as a whole. We should not refer to this bill as gender allocation, but gender limitation. We should give consideration to the sanctity of gender in educational courses" Ajorloo stated in an interview with ILNA.
Avaz Heydarpour, another MP who also supports the bill said "If women want to go after science and knowledge they should seek courses that will be useful for them at home"
Thursday, February 01, 2007
Human Kindness Transcends Artificial Barriers
What a heart warming story this is. Israel awarding an Arab Muslim for saving Jewish lives:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6318201.stm
Whenever human kindness transcends artificial barriers of race, religion, cast etc. it is a triumph for humanity. At a time when there is so much mindless sectarian violence, it is good to know about the likes of Khaled Abdulwahab.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6318201.stm
Whenever human kindness transcends artificial barriers of race, religion, cast etc. it is a triumph for humanity. At a time when there is so much mindless sectarian violence, it is good to know about the likes of Khaled Abdulwahab.
Tuesday, January 30, 2007
Sadeh Celebrations
Today, the day of Sadeh Celebration, should be the third most important celebration in the Iranian calendar after Nowrooz and Mehregan. In the Book of Kings, according to Iranian mythology, it is the day man discovered how to create fire at will and control it for the benefit of mankind.
Traditional celebration of Sadeh involves lighting a big fire outdoors. The ceremony is followed by singing and dancing around the fire by the people gathered for the festivity. Everyone is expected to participate in the festival by bringing wood for the fire.
By contributing to feed the flames of fire collectively together, we symbolically provide light and illumination to our mind, and hence the Zoroastrian tenets of Good Thoughts, Good Words and Good Deeds. By contributing to feed the flames of fire collectively, we remember the visible symbol of the Invisible Divine Light to fight evil.
But there will be no large fires in the birth place of Zarathustra today. There will be no singing and dancing around the fire. Today coincides with the Shiite ceremony of Ashura on the lunar Arab calendar. A day in which a battle between Arabs in Karbala is commemorated. A day in which heads were decapitated and raised aloft on spears as trophies, and little babies killed by arrows through their throats. A day in which water was denied to thirsty children, stranded in the desert.
Instead of singing and dancing in the land of Cyrus, men will beat their bare chests, and whip their backs with chains, men and children will draw blood by striking their heads with large daggers and Shiite priests will perform sermons in mosques with the sole intention of making the faithful weep.
Today in the land of Zarathustra, martyrdom, blood, death, lamentation and self flagellation have displaced the singing, dancing and the zest for life and pursuit of happiness.
Traditional celebration of Sadeh involves lighting a big fire outdoors. The ceremony is followed by singing and dancing around the fire by the people gathered for the festivity. Everyone is expected to participate in the festival by bringing wood for the fire.
By contributing to feed the flames of fire collectively together, we symbolically provide light and illumination to our mind, and hence the Zoroastrian tenets of Good Thoughts, Good Words and Good Deeds. By contributing to feed the flames of fire collectively, we remember the visible symbol of the Invisible Divine Light to fight evil.
But there will be no large fires in the birth place of Zarathustra today. There will be no singing and dancing around the fire. Today coincides with the Shiite ceremony of Ashura on the lunar Arab calendar. A day in which a battle between Arabs in Karbala is commemorated. A day in which heads were decapitated and raised aloft on spears as trophies, and little babies killed by arrows through their throats. A day in which water was denied to thirsty children, stranded in the desert.
Instead of singing and dancing in the land of Cyrus, men will beat their bare chests, and whip their backs with chains, men and children will draw blood by striking their heads with large daggers and Shiite priests will perform sermons in mosques with the sole intention of making the faithful weep.
Today in the land of Zarathustra, martyrdom, blood, death, lamentation and self flagellation have displaced the singing, dancing and the zest for life and pursuit of happiness.
Sunday, January 28, 2007
Iranian Women Rights Activists Arrested at the Airport
The following three Iranian women’s rights activists were arrested yesterday in Tehran's Imam Khomeini airport as they tried to attend a journalism workshop in New Delhi, India. They are held in the section 209 Evin Prison in Tehran.
The three are Talat Taghinia, Mansoureh Shojaee and Farnaz Seifi.
After the three were arrested at the airport, the security agents escorted them to their homes, searched their houses, and seized their personal belongings such as their computers, books and writings.
This is an opportunity for the Liberals, the Left and the women's rights activists in the West to show the Iranian people where they stand on fundamental issues of freedom and human rights.
Do they back Iranian people's legitimate struggle for human rights and democracy, do they back Iranian women's just cause for equal rights? Or do they only come out of their closets for a bit of US bashing?
Imagine what a boost it would be for other Iranian women's rights activists, if suddenly the international community displayed a massive show of solidarity for them. Imagine if the international community, instead of debating whether they should give in to the rulers of the Islamic Republic or preparing for a military attack, or begging the Iranian officials for talks, decided in a show of solidarity to expel ex-President Khatami and his delegation from Davos, Switzerland!
Dialogue amongst civilisations, is not just for Mr. Khatami to go to a conference and rattle on about it. Dialogue amongst civilisations means exchange programs and visits, where people and professions get to meet each other and to talk to each other, not just for a selected few government officials with the sole purpose of staying in power.
We are often asked "what do you want the international community to do?" Here is something you can do, expell all the Islamic Republic officials from all current international conferences and demand the release of these women!
The three are Talat Taghinia, Mansoureh Shojaee and Farnaz Seifi.
After the three were arrested at the airport, the security agents escorted them to their homes, searched their houses, and seized their personal belongings such as their computers, books and writings.
This is an opportunity for the Liberals, the Left and the women's rights activists in the West to show the Iranian people where they stand on fundamental issues of freedom and human rights.
Do they back Iranian people's legitimate struggle for human rights and democracy, do they back Iranian women's just cause for equal rights? Or do they only come out of their closets for a bit of US bashing?
Imagine what a boost it would be for other Iranian women's rights activists, if suddenly the international community displayed a massive show of solidarity for them. Imagine if the international community, instead of debating whether they should give in to the rulers of the Islamic Republic or preparing for a military attack, or begging the Iranian officials for talks, decided in a show of solidarity to expel ex-President Khatami and his delegation from Davos, Switzerland!
Dialogue amongst civilisations, is not just for Mr. Khatami to go to a conference and rattle on about it. Dialogue amongst civilisations means exchange programs and visits, where people and professions get to meet each other and to talk to each other, not just for a selected few government officials with the sole purpose of staying in power.
We are often asked "what do you want the international community to do?" Here is something you can do, expell all the Islamic Republic officials from all current international conferences and demand the release of these women!
Saturday, January 27, 2007
Thursday, January 25, 2007
Mehra Maleki on VOA
Really enjoyed watching Mehra Maleki on VOA tonight. She is so knowledgable about contemporary Iranian history and so confident when she speaks. Another remarkable point about Mehra is how well and fluent she speaks Persian. For someone who left Iran at the age of 13 to speak Persian so fluently, is truly remarkable and puts a lot of other Iranian ex-pats, who left Iran at a much later age and have forgotten their mother tongue, to shame.
I also like it when she has a go at the Iranian pseudo-intellectuals who helped mullahs come to power in 1979, and as she rightly says for having made such a huge misjudgement, they should by right simply retire but they don't seem to let go of the arena and continue with their nonsense claptrap.
Hope Mehra is invited as a guest on the program more often and wouldn't it be great if she starts a blog of her own.
I also like it when she has a go at the Iranian pseudo-intellectuals who helped mullahs come to power in 1979, and as she rightly says for having made such a huge misjudgement, they should by right simply retire but they don't seem to let go of the arena and continue with their nonsense claptrap.
Hope Mehra is invited as a guest on the program more often and wouldn't it be great if she starts a blog of her own.
Strange Bedfellows
I thought the title of the leader's comment in yesterday's Telegraph, "strange bedfellows", was a very suitable choice.
If you read any of the memoires by Iranian ex-political prisoners who were imprisoned by the Islamic regime for their Marxist sympathies, or speak to them in person, they will tell you that the regime's abhorrence for the Marxist prisoners was so profound that the prison guards were told not to have any skin contact with the untouchable - najes - atheists. When the Marxist prisoners were taken to interrogation, the guards would tell the prisoners to hold the end of a rolled up newspaper or a stick, so that the pious Muslim guard would not become polluted by having skin contact with the infidel.
After the massacre of Iranian political prisoners in 1988, the bodies of the victims were dumped in mass graves next to a Bahaii cemetery. The public became alerted of the mass graves only when they noticed large gathering of over enthusiastic stray dogs, scavenging for bones.
I remember the speech by Fakhreddin Hejazi, broadcast from Islamic state radio, at the beginning of the "cultural revolution". He was livid at having seen posters of Marx and Lenin in Iranian universities and was threatening and rebuking the infidel students for having put up posters of such atheists after the Islamic revolution.
So how is it that now, the North Koreans, Castro, Ortega, Putin's ex-KGB Mafia, are all best friends of the Islamic Republic? Indeed they all make strange bedfellows. Who knows, may be straight after their meetings, the Islamic Republic officials perform ablution rites. For now however, it is their common interest of survival in power that keeps them close together.
If you read any of the memoires by Iranian ex-political prisoners who were imprisoned by the Islamic regime for their Marxist sympathies, or speak to them in person, they will tell you that the regime's abhorrence for the Marxist prisoners was so profound that the prison guards were told not to have any skin contact with the untouchable - najes - atheists. When the Marxist prisoners were taken to interrogation, the guards would tell the prisoners to hold the end of a rolled up newspaper or a stick, so that the pious Muslim guard would not become polluted by having skin contact with the infidel.
After the massacre of Iranian political prisoners in 1988, the bodies of the victims were dumped in mass graves next to a Bahaii cemetery. The public became alerted of the mass graves only when they noticed large gathering of over enthusiastic stray dogs, scavenging for bones.
I remember the speech by Fakhreddin Hejazi, broadcast from Islamic state radio, at the beginning of the "cultural revolution". He was livid at having seen posters of Marx and Lenin in Iranian universities and was threatening and rebuking the infidel students for having put up posters of such atheists after the Islamic revolution.
So how is it that now, the North Koreans, Castro, Ortega, Putin's ex-KGB Mafia, are all best friends of the Islamic Republic? Indeed they all make strange bedfellows. Who knows, may be straight after their meetings, the Islamic Republic officials perform ablution rites. For now however, it is their common interest of survival in power that keeps them close together.
Monday, January 22, 2007
Anecdotes Instead of Research
A friend forwarded me an article by Ali G. Scotten, a PHD student in anthropology at the University of Chicago and a former Fulbright scholar, published in the Christian Science Monitor, for my perusal. For some reason I am just not keen on most academics of non-scientific subjects and the mega tonnes of "research" they produce. Perhaps its because of my engineering background, I like building things and changing things, not just writing essays about things. Right or wrong, I also seem to have a different view of what research is.
So this was my reply once I read the above article:
"The unfortunate thing is, these guys (think tanks/academics) call a few anecdotes and interviews with Iranian people, research. One thing they all misunderstand is that Iranians will not talk about their true feelings and spill out whats truly in their hearts in front of someone they dont know well enough. Talking the truth and whats really in your heart has consequences in Iran.
I kept telling this to the American officials and think tanks we saw when we were in US.
At the end of the day, I can say for 100% that his conclusion of talking to the regime is just wishful academic windup. What Iranian people need is confidence. If they think they have a good chance of overthrowing the regime, the critical mass in the protests against the regime will be reached. Look at what Iranian refugees risk. They risk their dignity, their life savings, their life and limb to leave Iran and come to the West, but most of them are not political and won't take part in the anti-government protests, so why do they take the risks to flee Iran? Because they think there is a 10% chance of a better life at the end of the tunnel. But sadly most of them feel there is 0% chance of overthrowing the regime.
Some people may be impressed by this guy's academic credentials but when he quotes an opium dealer who says he will lay down his life to save Iran from foreign invaders, I just then think the Chicago PHD student, Ali G. is not familiar with Iranian khalibandi :) - empty gestures and boasting.
"
Those with a scientific background will understand that one experiment that disproves a theory will then make the theory totally redundant. The proposition of dialogue with IRI leaders has been exercised by the EU countries for 27 years now, why go down a path that has failed again?
Instead I tend to believe the confidential report prepared by Iran's foreign affairs and defence ministry obtained by Le Monde.
PHD students on a single trip to Iran, still have to learn a lot about Iranian psychology and proper research.
So this was my reply once I read the above article:
"The unfortunate thing is, these guys (think tanks/academics) call a few anecdotes and interviews with Iranian people, research. One thing they all misunderstand is that Iranians will not talk about their true feelings and spill out whats truly in their hearts in front of someone they dont know well enough. Talking the truth and whats really in your heart has consequences in Iran.
I kept telling this to the American officials and think tanks we saw when we were in US.
At the end of the day, I can say for 100% that his conclusion of talking to the regime is just wishful academic windup. What Iranian people need is confidence. If they think they have a good chance of overthrowing the regime, the critical mass in the protests against the regime will be reached. Look at what Iranian refugees risk. They risk their dignity, their life savings, their life and limb to leave Iran and come to the West, but most of them are not political and won't take part in the anti-government protests, so why do they take the risks to flee Iran? Because they think there is a 10% chance of a better life at the end of the tunnel. But sadly most of them feel there is 0% chance of overthrowing the regime.
Some people may be impressed by this guy's academic credentials but when he quotes an opium dealer who says he will lay down his life to save Iran from foreign invaders, I just then think the Chicago PHD student, Ali G. is not familiar with Iranian khalibandi :) - empty gestures and boasting.
"
Those with a scientific background will understand that one experiment that disproves a theory will then make the theory totally redundant. The proposition of dialogue with IRI leaders has been exercised by the EU countries for 27 years now, why go down a path that has failed again?
Instead I tend to believe the confidential report prepared by Iran's foreign affairs and defence ministry obtained by Le Monde.
PHD students on a single trip to Iran, still have to learn a lot about Iranian psychology and proper research.
Tuesday, January 16, 2007
"Hossein Hossein Saved Iran not the Ey Iran Anthem"!
I had many reasons to start this blog, but the predominant reason was to present the real news about Iran. Not the news that got censored because foreign correspondents in Iran dared not cross the red lines in fear of getting deported, and not the news presented by those whose income depends on sounding intellectual to the anti-Bush niche market. I wanted the people in the world, including the young Muslims, to see the Islamic Republic of Iran for what it really is. Not the window dressing that the likes of Khatami so expertly do but also not the unnecessarily exaggerated version put out by the old dinosaurs of the old generation Iranian "opposition", which ultimately leads to losing us credibility.
Yet I think I am going to struggle in translating this piece of news which was printed in an Islamic Republic news site, Raja News. Only an Iranian will understand and feel the depth of tragedy behind the news. It shows how un-Iranian these present day rulers are. It echoes the real message behind Khomeini's famous reply of "Nothing", when on his flight from 15 years of exile to Iran, he was asked the question "How do you feel about returning to Iran after all these years?".
For these clerics ruling Iran now, feel "Nothing" about our homeland. Our joyous culture, our values, our pride in our heritage and in the achievements of our forefathers, means "Nothing" to these foreign usurpers of our land.
When Ayatollah Amoli is quoted in Raja News, that it was the cry of "Hossein, Hossein" and not the patriotic anthems of "Ey Iran.." that saved the country and therefore it is Hossein, the grandson of prophet Mohammad who along with his family members was savagely killed in the battle of Karbala outnumbered by other rival Arab armies, who owns the title deeds to this land, I struggle as to where to start and how to explain to a non-Iranian what this statement means.
I wish somehow I had a chance to stand up in front of the likes of Amoli and tell their brainless zealot audiences, that before the patriotic anthem of "Ey Iran.." was replaced by the chants of "Hossein, Hossein", the enemy aggressor was dealt with swiftly and appropriately. Everytime Saddam Hossein's adventurism flourished, he was punished and pushed back by the able Iranian soldiers whose hearts were stirred by the "Ey Iran" anthem.
The women of Khorramshahr did not have to suffer at the hands of ba'athist soldiers and Iranians did not have to suffer the agonising excruciating pain of chemical attacks and over a million Iranians did not have to die and be maimed, when the patriotic "Ey Iran" anthem stirred our hearts. Before the chants of "Hossein, Hossein" replaced the "Ey Iran" anthems, Saddam Hossein, was forced to sign a treaty under our terms. It was when you lot replaced the "Ey Iran" anthem with your "Hossein, Hossein" chants and destroyed our powerful army, that guarded our borders so dilligently, that Saddam Hossein dared tip his toes inside our Marze Por Gohar. Yet even after 8 years of sacrifice by Iranians to repel Saddam Hossein's henchmen, your lot could not bring about an honourable treaty and claim a rightful compensation for our people. This was the result of replacing Ey Iran anthem by the chants of Hossein Hossein!
تفو بر تو ای چرخ گردون، تفو!
Yet I think I am going to struggle in translating this piece of news which was printed in an Islamic Republic news site, Raja News. Only an Iranian will understand and feel the depth of tragedy behind the news. It shows how un-Iranian these present day rulers are. It echoes the real message behind Khomeini's famous reply of "Nothing", when on his flight from 15 years of exile to Iran, he was asked the question "How do you feel about returning to Iran after all these years?".
For these clerics ruling Iran now, feel "Nothing" about our homeland. Our joyous culture, our values, our pride in our heritage and in the achievements of our forefathers, means "Nothing" to these foreign usurpers of our land.
When Ayatollah Amoli is quoted in Raja News, that it was the cry of "Hossein, Hossein" and not the patriotic anthems of "Ey Iran.." that saved the country and therefore it is Hossein, the grandson of prophet Mohammad who along with his family members was savagely killed in the battle of Karbala outnumbered by other rival Arab armies, who owns the title deeds to this land, I struggle as to where to start and how to explain to a non-Iranian what this statement means.
I wish somehow I had a chance to stand up in front of the likes of Amoli and tell their brainless zealot audiences, that before the patriotic anthem of "Ey Iran.." was replaced by the chants of "Hossein, Hossein", the enemy aggressor was dealt with swiftly and appropriately. Everytime Saddam Hossein's adventurism flourished, he was punished and pushed back by the able Iranian soldiers whose hearts were stirred by the "Ey Iran" anthem.
The women of Khorramshahr did not have to suffer at the hands of ba'athist soldiers and Iranians did not have to suffer the agonising excruciating pain of chemical attacks and over a million Iranians did not have to die and be maimed, when the patriotic "Ey Iran" anthem stirred our hearts. Before the chants of "Hossein, Hossein" replaced the "Ey Iran" anthems, Saddam Hossein, was forced to sign a treaty under our terms. It was when you lot replaced the "Ey Iran" anthem with your "Hossein, Hossein" chants and destroyed our powerful army, that guarded our borders so dilligently, that Saddam Hossein dared tip his toes inside our Marze Por Gohar. Yet even after 8 years of sacrifice by Iranians to repel Saddam Hossein's henchmen, your lot could not bring about an honourable treaty and claim a rightful compensation for our people. This was the result of replacing Ey Iran anthem by the chants of Hossein Hossein!
تفو بر تو ای چرخ گردون، تفو!
Wednesday, January 10, 2007
In Broad Day Light in Islamic Republic
This is what happens in the Islamic Republic in broad day light. This is "Dialogue Amongst Civilisations", this is "Inter Faith Dialogue", this is "Civil Society" and all those other deceiving phrases used by the likes of Khatamis to woo the yoyos outside Iran.
A Peugeot stops the passengers in a Paykan. Plain clothes and armed persons from Peugeot, drag the passenger out of his Paykan car.
As the passers by look on in disbelief, the Paykan passenger is shoved into the trunk of the Peugeot car.
One passer by is seen confronting the kidnappers while the rest can only look on.
While the fate of the Paykan passenger is unknown, the car is towed away by municipal vehicle removal van.
Tuesday, January 09, 2007
Nazanin's Last Day
I post this email exactly as it reached my inbox:
Thank you to all the wonderful people who have been signing the petition at http://www.helpnazanin.com/ and have been spreading the word about the injustice that Nazanin Fatehi is facing in Iran.
Many of you are asking what you can do further?
1. Learn about the case and watch a 30 min documentary called "The Tale of Two Nazanins" at http://www.bodog.tv/
2. Sign the Petition at http://www.helpnazanin.com/
3. Fax or Email a personal message to the Iranian heads of state and Head of the Judiciary pleading with them to release Nazanin. (try to be diplomatic and do not use any profane language) For an idea of what to say you can watch my plea at : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYOA9l5rPPc.
Send your messages to:
AYATOLLAH KHAMENEISupreme Leader of the Islamic RepublicEmail: http://us.f515.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=info@leader.irEmail: http://us.f515.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=istiftaa@wilayah.orgFax: 00 98 251 7 774 2228
************************************
PRESIDENT AHMADNEJADPresident of Islamic RepublicEmail: http://us.f515.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=dr-ahmadinejad@president.irEmail through website: www.president.ir/emailPhone: 00 98 21 6 649 5880
************************************
4. Call your local Iranian Embassy To locate it go to www.irantravelingcenter.com/embassy.htm.
Iranian Embassy - United Kingdomhttp://us.f515.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=info@iran-embassy.org.ukIranian Embassy - Canadahttp://us.f515.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=ambassador@iranembassy.org
5. Tell your local media (Newspapers, TV, radio stations, magazines, on-line news)
6. Tell everyone you know (family, friends, schools, blogs, websites) and direct them to http://www.helpnazanin.com/
WE MUST HURRY THERE IS ONLY 1 DAY LEFT!!!!
Peace and love,
Nazanin Afshin-Jam
Thank you to all the wonderful people who have been signing the petition at http://www.helpnazanin.com/ and have been spreading the word about the injustice that Nazanin Fatehi is facing in Iran.
Many of you are asking what you can do further?
1. Learn about the case and watch a 30 min documentary called "The Tale of Two Nazanins" at http://www.bodog.tv/
2. Sign the Petition at http://www.helpnazanin.com/
3. Fax or Email a personal message to the Iranian heads of state and Head of the Judiciary pleading with them to release Nazanin. (try to be diplomatic and do not use any profane language) For an idea of what to say you can watch my plea at : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYOA9l5rPPc.
Send your messages to:
AYATOLLAH KHAMENEISupreme Leader of the Islamic RepublicEmail: http://us.f515.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=info@leader.irEmail: http://us.f515.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=istiftaa@wilayah.orgFax: 00 98 251 7 774 2228
************************************
PRESIDENT AHMADNEJADPresident of Islamic RepublicEmail: http://us.f515.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=dr-ahmadinejad@president.irEmail through website: www.president.ir/emailPhone: 00 98 21 6 649 5880
************************************
4. Call your local Iranian Embassy To locate it go to www.irantravelingcenter.com/embassy.htm.
Iranian Embassy - United Kingdomhttp://us.f515.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=info@iran-embassy.org.ukIranian Embassy - Canadahttp://us.f515.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=ambassador@iranembassy.org
5. Tell your local media (Newspapers, TV, radio stations, magazines, on-line news)
6. Tell everyone you know (family, friends, schools, blogs, websites) and direct them to http://www.helpnazanin.com/
WE MUST HURRY THERE IS ONLY 1 DAY LEFT!!!!
Peace and love,
Nazanin Afshin-Jam
Monday, January 08, 2007
Shirin Ebadi on VOA
As I have said before, it is always very hard for me to criticise those who are socially and politically active inside Iran. It would be very inappropriate for the likes of me to do that.
Likewise, I am not against Shirin Ebadi, I want her to be successful in defending those who have suffered human rights abuses inside Iran. However I just can not digest and understand one of her replies to the VOA presenter last night.
When the VOA presenter, Bijan Farhoody, asked Shirin Ebadi about her Nobel Prize lecture in Oslo, and why she spent so much time on non-Iran related issues in her lecture, Ebadi replied "Everything has its time and its place, where 90% of the audience are non-Iranians, then I should talk more about international issues, but when talking to an Iranian audience I will talk about Iran related issues"
But Shirin Ebadi did not talk more about the international issues and less about Iran related issues in her Nobel lecture. She did not say ANYTHING about Iran related issues in her Noble Prize lecture! and what sort of a logic is it that says in front of foreigners we should talk less about Iran? What is the point of talking about things we already know amongst ourselves?? Yes we Iranians know the Islamic Republic laws are discriminatory against women, children, religious minorities, personal and political freedoms, etc. The point is to tell the outside world about these human rights abuses who do not know these things!
I asked Ebadi similar question when she spoke in Imperial College in London, during Ganji's hunger strike, but she chose not to answer the question.
I think Ebadi shows a lack of judgement by the way she decides what to say in front of what audience.
What I do admire about Shirin Ebadi however, is her constant defiance of Islamic Republic "elections". Unlike other Iranian pseudo-intellectuals outside Iran, who seem to be yearning to find a way to go back to Iran, like Massoud Behnood and Ibrahim Nabavi who keep encouraging Iranians to go to the "ballot boxes" and choose between the bad and the worse, Ebadi has always consistently mocked the Islamic Republic "elections".
"One can not call these a free election, when opposition is not allowed to have a campaign platform and the candidates are vetted by the Guardian Council, therefore I will not take part in such elections" Ebadi has frequently said in her lectures to Iranian audiences.
Likewise, I am not against Shirin Ebadi, I want her to be successful in defending those who have suffered human rights abuses inside Iran. However I just can not digest and understand one of her replies to the VOA presenter last night.
When the VOA presenter, Bijan Farhoody, asked Shirin Ebadi about her Nobel Prize lecture in Oslo, and why she spent so much time on non-Iran related issues in her lecture, Ebadi replied "Everything has its time and its place, where 90% of the audience are non-Iranians, then I should talk more about international issues, but when talking to an Iranian audience I will talk about Iran related issues"
But Shirin Ebadi did not talk more about the international issues and less about Iran related issues in her Nobel lecture. She did not say ANYTHING about Iran related issues in her Noble Prize lecture! and what sort of a logic is it that says in front of foreigners we should talk less about Iran? What is the point of talking about things we already know amongst ourselves?? Yes we Iranians know the Islamic Republic laws are discriminatory against women, children, religious minorities, personal and political freedoms, etc. The point is to tell the outside world about these human rights abuses who do not know these things!
I asked Ebadi similar question when she spoke in Imperial College in London, during Ganji's hunger strike, but she chose not to answer the question.
I think Ebadi shows a lack of judgement by the way she decides what to say in front of what audience.
What I do admire about Shirin Ebadi however, is her constant defiance of Islamic Republic "elections". Unlike other Iranian pseudo-intellectuals outside Iran, who seem to be yearning to find a way to go back to Iran, like Massoud Behnood and Ibrahim Nabavi who keep encouraging Iranians to go to the "ballot boxes" and choose between the bad and the worse, Ebadi has always consistently mocked the Islamic Republic "elections".
"One can not call these a free election, when opposition is not allowed to have a campaign platform and the candidates are vetted by the Guardian Council, therefore I will not take part in such elections" Ebadi has frequently said in her lectures to Iranian audiences.
Sunday, January 07, 2007
Meeting with Siroos
I have been friends with Siroos Malakooty for several years now. Siroos is one of those people who I refer to as "having inherited Left wing genes" :) He will always have a Left wing accent and a Leftist view of the world. A good thing too, for it would be a boring, bland and monotonous world if we all looked the same, talked the same and thought the same.
Conversations with him are always interesting and challenging and I always learn from him. Despite our differences, we also always find a lot of common ground.
I had a chance to meet him in Paris yesterday after several months. Siroos is a classical guitar soloist and founder of Artists Without Frontiers. A stroke few years ago, resulted in Siroos not being able to raise his left arm above his shoulder, which has stopped him from playing classical guitar.
Siroos presents a program on Tishk TV, which is run and funded by the Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan. I was glad to find him in his usual high spirit. I wish him luck in his endeavours and hope he will contribute towards our common goal which is the well being and prosperity of human beings everywhere.
Conversations with him are always interesting and challenging and I always learn from him. Despite our differences, we also always find a lot of common ground.
I had a chance to meet him in Paris yesterday after several months. Siroos is a classical guitar soloist and founder of Artists Without Frontiers. A stroke few years ago, resulted in Siroos not being able to raise his left arm above his shoulder, which has stopped him from playing classical guitar.
Siroos presents a program on Tishk TV, which is run and funded by the Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan. I was glad to find him in his usual high spirit. I wish him luck in his endeavours and hope he will contribute towards our common goal which is the well being and prosperity of human beings everywhere.
Thursday, January 04, 2007
So Where are the Peaceniks?
Before the US-UK led attack to remove Saddam, I had lots of heated debates with peaceniks in the streets of London. Their central argument was that they don't want to see innocent people killed. Of course no one in their right mind wants to see innocent people killed, but my argument at the time was that innocent people were being killed while Saddam was in power, and it was he who was the cause of their deaths. One Left-wing revolutionary outside the tube station in Hammersmith was actually lost for words, when I put this argument to him "You advocate a violent revolution for the working classes to come to power, don't you?"
"We believe the bourgeoisie will never surrender power peacefully to the proletariat, so yes we do advocate a violent struggle by the masses as the only way to bring about a workers state" was his standard text book reply.
"But innocent people will be killed in your violent struggle too, won't they?" was the question that he could not answer.
Or when I once asked an SWP member selling his Socialist Worker outside a tube station, "Who should have removed Saddam or the Taliban?"
"It should be the people of Iraq and the people of Afghanistan" was his confident reply.
"But sometimes dictatorships are so brutal that people need outside help. Look at Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, the people of Cambodia had no chance against the Khmer Rouge. If it wasn't because of the Vietnamese, the killings by the Khmer Rouge would have continued. Yes lots of innocent people did die in the invasion of Cambodia by Vietnam. Yes it took many years for peace and stability to come back to the country, but overall it was better to remove Pol Pot."
I waited for his answer but after a moment of silence, embarrassingly all he could say was
"That was before I was born, I don't know enough about that."
Today the killing of innocent people in Iraq is not because of the US or UK troops. Innocent people are dying in Iraq because of the ruthless militias and their infiltration into the Iraqi security forces. According to the Economist, "The Mahdi Army, in particular, is thought to be responsible for most of the killing around Baghdad, which in turn—according to American officers—accounts for some 90% of the violence nationwide".
The Iraqi prime minister, Nuri al-Maliki, is obviously in cahoots with the brutal Mahdi Army leaders. He is holding back the troops from taking on the Mahdi Army, and he has made the US troops set free captured Mahdi Army leaders. Peaceniks please note that the Mahdi Army drills holes into innocent people. Ordinary people are so frightened of the dentist's drill even after an injection, now imagine the terror caused by a real masonry drill without any injection, into the bones of your body! Thats what the Mahdi Army do!
But the violence and the killing of the innocent people is not just limited to the Mahdi army, there are other groups too. There is one regional power however that pulls the strings and supports ALL of these militia groups. The objective of this regional power is to prevent democracy and stability in Iraq. Why? Because a prosperous democratic neighbour will motivate the Iranian people too.
I always detest hypocrisy, so while objecting to the killing of innocent people is always a noble cause, it should not matter who is doing it. If peaceniks march and demonstrate against those who are funding the brutal sectarian militias in Iraq, I will join them. But will we ever see the likes of Brian Haw have a protest outside the Iranian embassy in London? I doubt it very much. As usual these protesters are not even handed when it comes for caring for the lives of the innocent people.
"We believe the bourgeoisie will never surrender power peacefully to the proletariat, so yes we do advocate a violent struggle by the masses as the only way to bring about a workers state" was his standard text book reply.
"But innocent people will be killed in your violent struggle too, won't they?" was the question that he could not answer.
Or when I once asked an SWP member selling his Socialist Worker outside a tube station, "Who should have removed Saddam or the Taliban?"
"It should be the people of Iraq and the people of Afghanistan" was his confident reply.
"But sometimes dictatorships are so brutal that people need outside help. Look at Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, the people of Cambodia had no chance against the Khmer Rouge. If it wasn't because of the Vietnamese, the killings by the Khmer Rouge would have continued. Yes lots of innocent people did die in the invasion of Cambodia by Vietnam. Yes it took many years for peace and stability to come back to the country, but overall it was better to remove Pol Pot."
I waited for his answer but after a moment of silence, embarrassingly all he could say was
"That was before I was born, I don't know enough about that."
Today the killing of innocent people in Iraq is not because of the US or UK troops. Innocent people are dying in Iraq because of the ruthless militias and their infiltration into the Iraqi security forces. According to the Economist, "The Mahdi Army, in particular, is thought to be responsible for most of the killing around Baghdad, which in turn—according to American officers—accounts for some 90% of the violence nationwide".
The Iraqi prime minister, Nuri al-Maliki, is obviously in cahoots with the brutal Mahdi Army leaders. He is holding back the troops from taking on the Mahdi Army, and he has made the US troops set free captured Mahdi Army leaders. Peaceniks please note that the Mahdi Army drills holes into innocent people. Ordinary people are so frightened of the dentist's drill even after an injection, now imagine the terror caused by a real masonry drill without any injection, into the bones of your body! Thats what the Mahdi Army do!
But the violence and the killing of the innocent people is not just limited to the Mahdi army, there are other groups too. There is one regional power however that pulls the strings and supports ALL of these militia groups. The objective of this regional power is to prevent democracy and stability in Iraq. Why? Because a prosperous democratic neighbour will motivate the Iranian people too.
I always detest hypocrisy, so while objecting to the killing of innocent people is always a noble cause, it should not matter who is doing it. If peaceniks march and demonstrate against those who are funding the brutal sectarian militias in Iraq, I will join them. But will we ever see the likes of Brian Haw have a protest outside the Iranian embassy in London? I doubt it very much. As usual these protesters are not even handed when it comes for caring for the lives of the innocent people.
Wednesday, January 03, 2007
Change of Photo
Ever since I started my blog, friends and well wishers have been complaining about the photo I used in my blog. Especially the unshaved stubbles which prompted comments like "you look like one of those baseejis in Iran" :))
The truth is I dont have that many photos on my own. Most of the photos I have, are when I am amongst friends, family, colleagues or others and it would be unfair to include them on such a blog. Attempts to edit such pictures normally ends up in an ear getting cut or part of a chin missing etc.
Another criticism was the clothes I was wearing in the photo. "Why do you always dress in black?" Again the simple answer is being colour blind, wearing black is just a safe bet :) nothing more to it.
But finally, I listened to all these criticisms and changed the photo.
The truth is I dont have that many photos on my own. Most of the photos I have, are when I am amongst friends, family, colleagues or others and it would be unfair to include them on such a blog. Attempts to edit such pictures normally ends up in an ear getting cut or part of a chin missing etc.
Another criticism was the clothes I was wearing in the photo. "Why do you always dress in black?" Again the simple answer is being colour blind, wearing black is just a safe bet :) nothing more to it.
But finally, I listened to all these criticisms and changed the photo.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)