VMD-L Mailing List
From: Bahaa Mostafa (bmostafa_at_sci.cu.edu.eg)
Date: Wed Dec 24 2014 - 23:42:56 CST
- Next message: sunyeping: "答复: non-bonded interactions"
- Previous message: Ashar Malik: "Re: non-bonded interactions"
- In reply to: Ashar Malik: "Re: non-bonded interactions"
- Next in thread: Ashar Malik: "Re: non-bonded interactions"
- Reply: Ashar Malik: "Re: non-bonded interactions"
- Reply: Josh Vermaas: "Re: non-bonded interactions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
thank you ashar for interest,
but i don't use NAMD, i can't install it on my PC (windows) at all, i have
VMD installed correctly, but i don't know if it calculates energy with
charmm force field,
so i have to do calculations myself, i think all terms are going well, till
now but the nonbonding terms, i think some missing information about them
cause my calculations not accurate, hope you can answer my question or
recommend me a source to answer it,
my question again :
some atoms have 1-4 LJ parameters , but others don't have,
what does it mean ?
does it mean these atoms have no vdW interaction?,
or does it mean i should use the not 1-4 LJ parameters instead of these
missing parts ?
best wishes,
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Ashar Malik <asharjm_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> how can i calculate 1-4 vdW interaction energies for those atoms don't
>> have 1-4 LJ parameters,
>>
>
> Three things:
>
> 1) You need to do some reading about what the force field terms are and
> what do they actually mean?
>
> 2) What 1 - 4 means?
>
> 3) When you run a simulation/minimization energy terms are printed out to
> the log file. vdW is a form of NONBONDED energy and has its own column. If
> you want to do the calculation not on the entire system but a small
> selection of atoms - look at ATOMSELECT to make the selection and use
> NAMDENERGY to calculate the energy of your system.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
>
> --
> Best,
> /A
>
-- *Disclaimer:* This E-mail represents the views of its author only and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of Faculty of Science (*SCI <http://www.science.cu.edu.eg>*). We do not assume responsibility for any loss, damage (including direct, indirect, punitive, special, or consequential loss or damage), which you may directly or indirectly suffer from this email or its contents or through the ways of handling this email which includes sending, receiving, replying, forwarding, deleting, saving or changing and adjusting its content in any way. The existence of *SCI* <http://www.science.cu.edu.eg>logo on any material you receive means that it has been uploaded on the network servers, and does not necessarily mean that *SCI* <http://www.science.cu.edu.eg>owns these materials either partially or fully. In addition, any service that is provided by and/or through *ITU(SCI) <http://itu.sci.cu.edu.eg>*, without exception, does not take any responsibility for any illegal use through them either by negligence, misconduct, misuse and/or abuse. And even though our network checks and scans all e-mails to make sure it is safe and does not contain any viruses,Trojans or Spywares , it is also the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that the e-mails and attachments therein are free of any danger, and *SCI <http://www.science.cu.edu.eg>*will take no responsibility for any damages or losses that may arise as a result from the misuse or the presence of viruses or spyware sent through messages or web services.
- Next message: sunyeping: "答复: non-bonded interactions"
- Previous message: Ashar Malik: "Re: non-bonded interactions"
- In reply to: Ashar Malik: "Re: non-bonded interactions"
- Next in thread: Ashar Malik: "Re: non-bonded interactions"
- Reply: Ashar Malik: "Re: non-bonded interactions"
- Reply: Josh Vermaas: "Re: non-bonded interactions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]