From: Gumbart, JC (gumbart_at_physics.gatech.edu)
Date: Wed Dec 09 2020 - 14:56:23 CST
For reference, for a 1.45-million atom system with NAMD3, I get 9 ns/day on a V100 with 4-fs time steps and HMR. I recall P100s being ~1/2 the speed, so you’re not too far off my expectation.
I haven’t tried over multiple GPUs or nodes, but I find it’s usually easier to just run multiple copies, one GPU each. Shorter runs but better statistics.
Best,
JC
On Dec 9, 2020, at 11:21 AM, Bennion, Brian <Bennion1_at_llnl.gov<mailto:Bennion1_at_llnl.gov>> wrote:
Hello Kelly,
I am not well versed on the workload distribution in namd3 so if there is anyone out there willing to correct me, I will say that you need 10 more nodes of the exact setup you are currently using to see the same throughput.
For AMBER, cross node GPU communication is not recommended, at least for amber18.
brian
________________________________
From: McGuire, Kelly <mcg05004_at_byui.edu<mailto:mcg05004_at_byui.edu>>
Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2020 11:14 PM
To: Bennion, Brian <bennion1_at_llnl.gov<mailto:bennion1_at_llnl.gov>>; namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu<mailto:namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu> <namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu<mailto:namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu>>
Subject: Re: CPU vs GPU Question
Brian, follow up question. Did you mean at least 10 more nodes of CPUs only, or can I use multiple nodes of CPUs and GPUs? Is it true that GPUs don't work great across nodes?
Dr. Kelly L. McGuire
PhD Biophysics
Department of Physiology and Developmental Biology
Brigham Young University
LSB 3050
Provo, UT 84602
________________________________
From: Bennion, Brian <bennion1_at_llnl.gov<mailto:bennion1_at_llnl.gov>>
Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2020 4:05 PM
To: namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu<mailto:namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu> <namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu<mailto:namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu>>; McGuire, Kelly <mcg05004_at_byui.edu<mailto:mcg05004_at_byui.edu>>
Subject: Re: CPU vs GPU Question
Hello,
You will be needing to use at least 10 more nodes to approach the throughput you are accustomed to seeing. That is where MPI or Ifiniban will be playing the key role in the calculations.
Your sysadmin will be able to tell you if/what mpi exists on the cluster.
Brian
________________________________
From: owner-namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu<mailto:owner-namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu> <owner-namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu<mailto:owner-namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu>> on behalf of McGuire, Kelly <mcg05004_at_byui.edu<mailto:mcg05004_at_byui.edu>>
Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2020 2:51 PM
To: namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu<mailto:namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu> <namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu<mailto:namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu>>
Subject: namd-l: CPU vs GPU Question
In all of my simulations so far, I have used one node with 4xP100 GPUs and 24 CPU cores. I usually get ~40 ns/day with a system between 75,000 and 150,000 atoms. I am now trying to do a simulation that is 1.4 million atoms. Currently getting ~4 ns/day.
What is a better approach to speed up this simulation as atom number scales? More GPUs on one node or more CPUs and use multiple nodes? Where does MPI come into play here?
Dr. Kelly L. McGuire
PhD Biophysics
Department of Physiology and Developmental Biology
Brigham Young University
LSB 3050
Provo, UT 84602
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Fri Dec 31 2021 - 23:17:10 CST