[71]
Therefore in other
disputes and trials, when the question at issue is, whether a thing has been done or not,
whether what is alleged be true or false; and when false witnesses are sometimes suborned, and
false documents foisted in; it is possible that sometimes a virtuous judge may be led into
error by a seemingly honourable and probable pretence; or that an opportunity may be given to
a dishonest judge, of appearing to be guided by the witnesses, or by the documents produced,
though in reality he has knowingly given a wrong decision. For questions of law there is
nothing of this sort, O judges: there are no forged documents, no dishonest witnesses; even
that overgrown power, which has sway in this state, is dormant with respect to cases of this
sort; it has no means of attacking the judge, or of moving a finger. For this can be said to a
judge by some man who is not so scrupulous as he is influential; “Decide, I pray
you, that this has been done or planned; give credit to this witness; establish the
genuineness of these documents;”—
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.