Named Entity Results
The Daily Dispatch: January 30, 1864., [Electronic resource]

Correspondence between Generals Longstreet and Foster. We copied yesterday, from Northern papers, a correspondence between Lieut. Gen. Longstreet and Major General Foster, commanding the Yankee forces in East Tennessee. Designedly, no doubt, the most important letter of this correspondence was omitted in the journal from which we copied the letters which have already appeared. As the letter speaks for itself, and terminates the correspondence, we submit without comment: Headq'rs Dep't East Tennessee, January 11, 1864. Sir --I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 7th of January, with its enclosures, &c. The disingenuous manner in which you have misconstrued my letter of the 3d has disappointed me. The suggestion you claim to have adopted was in words as follows viz: "I presume, however, that the great object and end in view was to hasten the day of peace. I respectfully suggest for your consideration the propriety of communicat

le terms on which deserters will be received. --Step by step you have gone on in violation of the laws of honorable warfare. Our farms have been destroyed, our women and children have been robbed, and our houses have been pillaged and burnt. You have laid your plans and worked diligently to produce wholesale murder by servile insurrection. And now, the most ignoble of all, you propose to degrade the human race by inducing soldiers to dishonor and forswear themselves. Soldiers who have met your own on so many honorable fields, who have breasted the storm or battle in defence of their honor, their families and their homes, for three long years, have a right to expect more of honor, even in their adversaries. I beg leave to return the copies of the proclamation and your order. I have the honor to renew to you the assurances of great respect, your obedient servant, J. Longstreet, Lieutenant-General Commanding. Maj. Gen. J. G. Poster, Commanding Department of Ohio.

Correspondence between Generals Longstreet and Foster. We copied yesterday, from Northern papers, a correspondence between Lieut. Gen. Longstreet and Major General Foster, commanding the Yankee forces in East Tennessee. Designedly, no doubt, the most important letter of this correspondence was omitted in the journal from whiLieut. Gen. Longstreet and Major General Foster, commanding the Yankee forces in East Tennessee. Designedly, no doubt, the most important letter of this correspondence was omitted in the journal from which we copied the letters which have already appeared. As the letter speaks for itself, and terminates the correspondence, we submit without comment: Headq'rs Dep't East Tennessee, January 11, 1864. Sir --I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 7th of January, with its enclosures, &c. Thght to expect more of honor, even in their adversaries. I beg leave to return the copies of the proclamation and your order. I have the honor to renew to you the assurances of great respect, your obedient servant, J. Longstreet, Lieutenant-General Commanding. Maj. Gen. J. G. Poster, Commanding Department of Ohio.

Correspondence between Generals Longstreet and Foster. We copied yesterday, from Northern papers, a correspondence between Lieut. Gen. Longstreet and Major General Foster, commanding the Yankee forces in East Tennessee. Designedly, no doubt, the most important letter of this correspondence was omitted in the journal from which we copied the letters which have already appeared. As the letter speaks for itself, and terminates the correspondence, we submit without comment: Headq'rs Dep'Major General Foster, commanding the Yankee forces in East Tennessee. Designedly, no doubt, the most important letter of this correspondence was omitted in the journal from which we copied the letters which have already appeared. As the letter speaks for itself, and terminates the correspondence, we submit without comment: Headq'rs Dep't East Tennessee, January 11, 1864. Sir --I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 7th of January, with its enclosures, &c. The disingenuous manner in which you have misconstrued my letter of the 3d has disappointed me. The suggestion you claim to have adopted was in words as follows viz: "I presume, however, that the great object and end in view was to hasten the day of peace. I respectfully suggest for your consideration the propriety of communicat

ween Lieut. Gen. Longstreet and Major General Foster, commanding the Yankee forces in East Tennessee. Designedly, no doubt, the most important letter of this correspondence was omitted in the journal from which we copied the letters which have already appeared. As the letter speaks for itself, and terminates the correspondence, we submit without comment: Headq'rs Dep't East Tennessee, January 11, 1864. Sir --I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 7th of January, with its enclosures, &c. The disingenuous manner in which you have misconstrued my letter of the 3d has disappointed me. The suggestion you claim to have adopted was in words as follows viz: "I presume, however, that the great object and end in view was to hasten the day of peace. I respectfully suggest for your consideration the propriety of communicating any views that your Government may have on that subject through me, rather than by handbills circulated amongst our sold

erals Longstreet and Foster. We copied yesterday, from Northern papers, a correspondence between Lieut. Gen. Longstreet and Major General Foster, commanding the Yankee forces in East Tennessee. Designedly, no doubt, the most important letter of this correspondence was omitted in the journal from which we copied the letters which have already appeared. As the letter speaks for itself, and terminates the correspondence, we submit without comment: Headq'rs Dep't East Tennessee, January 11, 1864. Sir --I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 7th of January, with its enclosures, &c. The disingenuous manner in which you have misconstrued my letter of the 3d has disappointed me. The suggestion you claim to have adopted was in words as follows viz: "I presume, however, that the great object and end in view was to hasten the day of peace. I respectfully suggest for your consideration the propriety of communicating any views that your Gove