hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
C. L. Vallandigham 47 1 Browse Search
Abraham Lincoln 20 0 Browse Search
City Point (Virginia, United States) 8 0 Browse Search
James Brooks 8 2 Browse Search
Samuel Lee 6 0 Browse Search
John Smith 6 0 Browse Search
Napoleon 6 0 Browse Search
Belle Isle, Va. (Virginia, United States) 6 0 Browse Search
James H. Taylor 6 0 Browse Search
Dorn 6 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: May 27, 1863., [Electronic resource].

Found 373 total hits in 194 results.

1 2 3 4 5 6 ...
Abraham Lincoln (search for this): article 1
Vallandingham — what will Lincoln do? The sympathizers in New York have made a direct appeal to the Washington Dictator to let Vallandigham loose, reminding his committed the grave mistake. In either event it is within the power of President Lincoln to reverse these proceedings, and to turn over the accused to the civil a law in the loyal States, or there will be civil war in the North." Will Lincoln "quash" them and "prevent civil war," according to the Herald? or, if he will If we could reason about a Yankee as we can about other men, we would say that Lincoln would be compelled to "quash" the sentence, or to go on with his arrests, and that immunity to seditious declaimers which his failure to arrest them gives. Lincoln has most assuredly now a difficult road to travel. Hesitation is dangerous. han any yet adopted by Northern meetings. They increase the embarrassments of Lincoln and press more decidedly upon him the necessity of carrying out his policy of
Seymour (search for this): article 1
ere freely uttered — sentiments, indeed, more violent and offensive to the Federal Executive than those uttered by Vallandigham, for which he has been sent to Fort Warren. Letters addressed to the officers of the meeting, especially that of Governor Seymour's, assert that if the proceedings in Vallandigham's case remain as the judgement and final decision by the Government, that they have beyond question already established at the North a complete military despotism. The New York Herald, whichas we can about other men, we would say that Lincoln would be compelled to "quash" the sentence, or to go on with his arrests, and to put in his bastilles not only the small men who made the excited speeches in New York city on the 19th, but Governor Seymour and Washington Hunt and their brother sympathizers generally. If sedition is to be put down by arbitrary arrests, then those arrests must go on. If he abandons that policy, then he must let loose Vallandigham. To keep him in prison and arr
Burnside (search for this): article 1
The following expression thereon, from the Herald of the 20th, may be taken as indicative of the popular view of this matter at least in New York: "If General Burnside on his own responsibility initiated these late military proceedings against Mr. Vallandigham, he has foolishly dashed himself against a stone wall much more gravated its fault. If it had a right to commute a punishment it had a right to inflict it, which is the point in dispute. The tyrannical privileges assumed by Burnside are reaffirmed by a variation of the sentence, which violates just as glaringly the constitutional rights of the citizen. This is an aggravation instead of a pa his policy of military arrests for sedition, or of abandoning them altogether. He can neither quiet clamor by exiling Vallandigham nor intimidate sedition by simply refusing to liberate him. He must go ahead or back out. Each day is increasing the number of prominent men incurring the penalties of such an order as Burnside's.
19th (search for this): article 1
he vitality of the civil law in the loyal States, or there will be civil war in the North." Will Lincoln "quash" them and "prevent civil war," according to the Herald? or, if he will not "quash" them, will "civil war" ensue? If we could reason about a Yankee as we can about other men, we would say that Lincoln would be compelled to "quash" the sentence, or to go on with his arrests, and to put in his bastilles not only the small men who made the excited speeches in New York city on the 19th, but Governor Seymour and Washington Hunt and their brother sympathizers generally. If sedition is to be put down by arbitrary arrests, then those arrests must go on. If he abandons that policy, then he must let loose Vallandigham. To keep him in prison and arrest no more men, would be but showing his own hesitation and fear of the consequences. To refuse to liberate him will only continue the cause of the excitement and that immunity to seditious declaimers which his failure to arrest the
Washington (search for this): article 1
, declared their opinions decidedly in opposition to it. The following expression thereon, from the Herald of the 20th, may be taken as indicative of the popular view of this matter at least in New York: "If General Burnside on his own responsibility initiated these late military proceedings against Mr. Vallandigham, he has foolishly dashed himself against a stone wall much more difficult to carry than that along the heights of Fredericksburg. If he has acted under instructions from Washington, the Administration has committed the grave mistake. In either event it is within the power of President Lincoln to reverse these proceedings, and to turn over the accused to the civil authorities. The Northern elections of last autumn involved a serious warning from the loyal States against these arbitrary arrests — a warning which, it was hoped, had put an end to them. Under this conviction the people of the several States concerned in our spring elections rose up to sustain the Admin
Vallandingham (search for this): article 1
Vallandingham — what will Lincoln do? The sympathizers in New York have made a direct appeal to the Washington Dictator to let Vallandigham loose, reminding him that they look upon the arrest and trial of the Ohio statesman as a violation of the Constitution and laws of the United States. The resolutions in which this conclusion is asserted were the formally adopted opinions of immense meetings, at which sentiments stronger than those in the resolutions themselves were freely uttered — sentiments, indeed, more violent and offensive to the Federal Executive than those uttered by Vallandigham, for which he has been sent to Fort Warren. Letters addressed to the officers of the meeting, especially that of Governor Seymour's, assert that if the proceedings in Vallandigham's case remain as the judgement and final decision by the Government, that they have beyond question already established at the North a complete military despotism. The New York Herald, which has been playing fast
C. L. Vallandigham (search for this): article 1
the Federal Executive than those uttered by Vallandigham, for which he has been sent to Fort Warren.eymour's, assert that if the proceedings in Vallandigham's case remain as the judgement and final def the course of the Government in regard to Vallandigham. It is, no doubt, forced to this by populathey were most signally defeated.--But this Vallandigham affair furnishes the very capital to these st quash these military proceedings against Vallandigham, and recognize the vitality of the civil labandons that policy, then he must let loose Vallandigham. To keep him in prison and arrest no more travel. Hesitation is dangerous. To keep Vallandigham in prison and arrest no more men, will onlyral Dictator has commuted the sentence of Mr. Vallandigham to transportation through the lines of hi the modification of the penalty imposed on Vallandigham makes the crime of his arrest and trial "a er. He can neither quiet clamor by exiling Vallandigham nor intimidate sedition by simply refusing [2 more...]
Washington Hunt (search for this): article 1
oyal States, or there will be civil war in the North." Will Lincoln "quash" them and "prevent civil war," according to the Herald? or, if he will not "quash" them, will "civil war" ensue? If we could reason about a Yankee as we can about other men, we would say that Lincoln would be compelled to "quash" the sentence, or to go on with his arrests, and to put in his bastilles not only the small men who made the excited speeches in New York city on the 19th, but Governor Seymour and Washington Hunt and their brother sympathizers generally. If sedition is to be put down by arbitrary arrests, then those arrests must go on. If he abandons that policy, then he must let loose Vallandigham. To keep him in prison and arrest no more men, would be but showing his own hesitation and fear of the consequences. To refuse to liberate him will only continue the cause of the excitement and that immunity to seditious declaimers which his failure to arrest them gives. Lincoln has most assuredly
Connecticut (Connecticut, United States) (search for this): article 1
within the power of President Lincoln to reverse these proceedings, and to turn over the accused to the civil authorities. The Northern elections of last autumn involved a serious warning from the loyal States against these arbitrary arrests — a warning which, it was hoped, had put an end to them. Under this conviction the people of the several States concerned in our spring elections rose up to sustain the Administration and the war against all the peace clamors of the Copperheads. In Connecticut, where those agitators were the most numerous and violent, they were most signally defeated.--But this Vallandigham affair furnishes the very capital to these Democratic radicals which they have so much desired, and puts them in a constitutional position from which they cannot be displaced. The public sentiment of New York, and of all the loyal States, on this point is with them, and the Administration must quash these military proceedings against Vallandigham, and recognize the vitality
United States (United States) (search for this): article 1
Vallandingham — what will Lincoln do? The sympathizers in New York have made a direct appeal to the Washington Dictator to let Vallandigham loose, reminding him that they look upon the arrest and trial of the Ohio statesman as a violation of the Constitution and laws of the United States. The resolutions in which this conclusion is asserted were the formally adopted opinions of immense meetings, at which sentiments stronger than those in the resolutions themselves were freely uttered — sentiments, indeed, more violent and offensive to the Federal Executive than those uttered by Vallandigham, for which he has been sent to Fort Warren. Letters addressed to the officers of the meeting, especially that of Governor Seymour's, assert that if the proceedings in Vallandigham's case remain as the judgement and final decision by the Government, that they have beyond question already established at the North a complete military despotism. The New York Herald, which has been playing fast
1 2 3 4 5 6 ...