hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Sorting
You can sort these results in two ways:
- By entity
- Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
- By position (current method)
- As the entities appear in the document.
You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.
hide
Most Frequent Entities
The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.
Entity | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
United States (United States) | 36 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Lincoln | 16 | 2 | Browse | Search |
Rosencranz | 16 | 4 | Browse | Search |
North Carolina (North Carolina, United States) | 14 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) | 14 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Tom Taylor | 14 | 2 | Browse | Search |
Maryland (Maryland, United States) | 14 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Fall's Church (Virginia, United States) | 14 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Henry D. Crockett | 13 | 1 | Browse | Search |
J. E. B. Stuart | 10 | 0 | Browse | Search |
View all entities in this document... |
Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: October 3, 1861., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.
Found 13 total hits in 5 results.
North Carolina (North Carolina, United States) (search for this): article 2
Charlotte (North Carolina, United States) (search for this): article 2
Hatteras and the coast defence.
--The Charlotte (N. C.) Democrat, of Monday, says:
A great deal has been said about who is to blame for the loss of Fort Hatteras.
We find in the State Journal the message of Governor Clark, and report of Hon. Warren Winslow, Military Secretary, submitted to the House of Commons on the 6th of September, in response to a resolution of that body calling for information on the subject.
We have been one of those who thought the State authorities at Raleigh were very much to blame for the unprepared condition of the coast, but the message and report, we are bound to say, do not justify such a belier; for, according to those documents, the Governor and Military Secretary did all they could do towards preparing the coast for defensive operations.
If they are to blame for anything, it is for not making known to the people of the State that their requisitions on the Confederate Government were not acceded to.
We learn that Gov. Clark is now d
Warren Winslow (search for this): article 2
Hatteras and the coast defence.
--The Charlotte (N. C.) Democrat, of Monday, says:
A great deal has been said about who is to blame for the loss of Fort Hatteras.
We find in the State Journal the message of Governor Clark, and report of Hon. Warren Winslow, Military Secretary, submitted to the House of Commons on the 6th of September, in response to a resolution of that body calling for information on the subject.
We have been one of those who thought the State authorities at Raleigh were very much to blame for the unprepared condition of the coast, but the message and report, we are bound to say, do not justify such a belier; for, according to those documents, the Governor and Military Secretary did all they could do towards preparing the coast for defensive operations.
If they are to blame for anything, it is for not making known to the people of the State that their requisitions on the Confederate Government were not acceded to.
We learn that Gov. Clark is now d
C. D. Clark (search for this): article 2
Hatteras and the coast defence.
--The Charlotte (N. C.) Democrat, of Monday, says:
A great deal has been said about who is to blame for the loss of Fort Hatteras.
We find in the State Journal the message of Governor Clark, and report of Hon. Warren Winslow, Military Secretary, submitted to the House of Commons on the 6th of September, in response to a resolution of that body calling for information on the subject.
We have been one of those who thought the State authorities at Raleiuld do towards preparing the coast for defensive operations.
If they are to blame for anything, it is for not making known to the people of the State that their requisitions on the Confederate Government were not acceded to.
We learn that Gov. Clark is now doing all he can to defend the coast, and is sending forward companies and regiments as fast as they can be equipped.
He made a request recently of the Secretary of War, that a few well drilled regiments be sent to our coast, promising
June, 9 AD (search for this): article 2
Hatteras and the coast defence.
--The Charlotte (N. C.) Democrat, of Monday, says:
A great deal has been said about who is to blame for the loss of Fort Hatteras.
We find in the State Journal the message of Governor Clark, and report of Hon. Warren Winslow, Military Secretary, submitted to the House of Commons on the 6th of September, in response to a resolution of that body calling for information on the subject.
We have been one of those who thought the State authorities at Raleigh were very much to blame for the unprepared condition of the coast, but the message and report, we are bound to say, do not justify such a belier; for, according to those documents, the Governor and Military Secretary did all they could do towards preparing the coast for defensive operations.
If they are to blame for anything, it is for not making known to the people of the State that their requisitions on the Confederate Government were not acceded to.
We learn that Gov. Clark is now d