hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 74 0 Browse Search
G. T. Beauregard 25 1 Browse Search
James D. Johnston 22 0 Browse Search
Abraham Lincoln 22 0 Browse Search
Missouri (Missouri, United States) 16 0 Browse Search
Thomas J. Armstrong 14 0 Browse Search
Zeno Farrington 13 1 Browse Search
South Carolina (South Carolina, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
France (France) 12 0 Browse Search
Jefferson Davis 10 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: August 16, 1861., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 4 total hits in 4 results.

Carlile (search for this): article 8
Carlile on Moral Obligations. --In the course of a speech delivered in the United States Senate on the 30th ult., the traitor Carlile said: He was free to say if he should be so unfortunate as to be taken prisoner by the enemies of his country, and could only preserve his life by taking the oath, and if he believed it his duty to his country and family to preserve his life, then he should not regard the oath as a binding obligation, morally or legally. If we are correctly informed (says the N. O. Bulletin,) several of the United States Army officers recently captured by Gen. Van Dorn, in Texas, and released on their parole of honor not to serve in the United States Army during the present war, entertained the same idea of the binding obligation of an oath that the dishonorable Mr. Carlile does, and have assumed positions in Lincoln's army.
Dorn (search for this): article 8
Carlile on Moral Obligations. --In the course of a speech delivered in the United States Senate on the 30th ult., the traitor Carlile said: He was free to say if he should be so unfortunate as to be taken prisoner by the enemies of his country, and could only preserve his life by taking the oath, and if he believed it his duty to his country and family to preserve his life, then he should not regard the oath as a binding obligation, morally or legally. If we are correctly informed (says the N. O. Bulletin,) several of the United States Army officers recently captured by Gen. Van Dorn, in Texas, and released on their parole of honor not to serve in the United States Army during the present war, entertained the same idea of the binding obligation of an oath that the dishonorable Mr. Carlile does, and have assumed positions in Lincoln's army.
Abraham Lincoln (search for this): article 8
Carlile on Moral Obligations. --In the course of a speech delivered in the United States Senate on the 30th ult., the traitor Carlile said: He was free to say if he should be so unfortunate as to be taken prisoner by the enemies of his country, and could only preserve his life by taking the oath, and if he believed it his duty to his country and family to preserve his life, then he should not regard the oath as a binding obligation, morally or legally. If we are correctly informed (says the N. O. Bulletin,) several of the United States Army officers recently captured by Gen. Van Dorn, in Texas, and released on their parole of honor not to serve in the United States Army during the present war, entertained the same idea of the binding obligation of an oath that the dishonorable Mr. Carlile does, and have assumed positions in Lincoln's army.
30th (search for this): article 8
Carlile on Moral Obligations. --In the course of a speech delivered in the United States Senate on the 30th ult., the traitor Carlile said: He was free to say if he should be so unfortunate as to be taken prisoner by the enemies of his country, and could only preserve his life by taking the oath, and if he believed it his duty to his country and family to preserve his life, then he should not regard the oath as a binding obligation, morally or legally. If we are correctly informed (says the N. O. Bulletin,) several of the United States Army officers recently captured by Gen. Van Dorn, in Texas, and released on their parole of honor not to serve in the United States Army during the present war, entertained the same idea of the binding obligation of an oath that the dishonorable Mr. Carlile does, and have assumed positions in Lincoln's army.