hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Sorting
You can sort these results in two ways:
- By entity
- Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
- By position (current method)
- As the entities appear in the document.
You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.
hide
Most Frequent Entities
The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.
Entity | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
United States (United States) | 42 | 0 | Browse | Search |
G. N. Lincoln | 29 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Maryland (Maryland, United States) | 28 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Fort Pickens (Florida, United States) | 20 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Georgia (Georgia, United States) | 16 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Abraham Lincoln | 14 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) | 12 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Annapolis (Maryland, United States) | 12 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Richmond (Virginia, United States) | 12 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Virginia (Virginia, United States) | 12 | 0 | Browse | Search |
View all entities in this document... |
Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: may 7, 1861., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.
Found 8 total hits in 4 results.
France (France) (search for this): article 3
France and the Confederacy.
--The Washington Chronicle, of Saturday, confirms the letter of the N. Y. Times in relation to a conversation between the French Minister of Foreign Affairs and Mr. Faulkner, and says:
"The Secretary of State, in a recent letter to Mr. Dayton, our new French Minister, clearly but firmly instructs him in relation to this subject, and wishes him to directly and unequivocally inform the French Government that our own will, in no event, in any way, sanction or permit the separation of the Union--a Union which has not only in the past, but will in the future, confer its benign blessings on the citizens of the United States.--Such, we verbally learn, is but a faint outline of the important correspondence."
United States (United States) (search for this): article 3
France and the Confederacy.
--The Washington Chronicle, of Saturday, confirms the letter of the N. Y. Times in relation to a conversation between the French Minister of Foreign Affairs and Mr. Faulkner, and says:
"The Secretary of State, in a recent letter to Mr. Dayton, our new French Minister, clearly but firmly instructs him in relation to this subject, and wishes him to directly and unequivocally inform the French Government that our own will, in no event, in any way, sanction or permit the separation of the Union--a Union which has not only in the past, but will in the future, confer its benign blessings on the citizens of the United States.--Such, we verbally learn, is but a faint outline of the important correspondence."
Faulkner (search for this): article 3
France and the Confederacy.
--The Washington Chronicle, of Saturday, confirms the letter of the N. Y. Times in relation to a conversation between the French Minister of Foreign Affairs and Mr. Faulkner, and says:
"The Secretary of State, in a recent letter to Mr. Dayton, our new French Minister, clearly but firmly instructs him in relation to this subject, and wishes him to directly and unequivocally inform the French Government that our own will, in no event, in any way, sanction or permit the separation of the Union--a Union which has not only in the past, but will in the future, confer its benign blessings on the citizens of the United States.--Such, we verbally learn, is but a faint outline of the important correspondence."
Dayton (search for this): article 3
France and the Confederacy.
--The Washington Chronicle, of Saturday, confirms the letter of the N. Y. Times in relation to a conversation between the French Minister of Foreign Affairs and Mr. Faulkner, and says:
"The Secretary of State, in a recent letter to Mr. Dayton, our new French Minister, clearly but firmly instructs him in relation to this subject, and wishes him to directly and unequivocally inform the French Government that our own will, in no event, in any way, sanction or permit the separation of the Union--a Union which has not only in the past, but will in the future, confer its benign blessings on the citizens of the United States.--Such, we verbally learn, is but a faint outline of the important correspondence."