hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 1,974 0 Browse Search
Doc 578 0 Browse Search
Abraham Lincoln 485 1 Browse Search
Maryland (Maryland, United States) 430 0 Browse Search
South Carolina (South Carolina, United States) 416 0 Browse Search
England (United Kingdom) 310 0 Browse Search
Kentucky (Kentucky, United States) 304 0 Browse Search
Baltimore, Md. (Maryland, United States) 253 1 Browse Search
Robert Anderson 242 4 Browse Search
Massachusetts (Massachusetts, United States) 192 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Documents and Narratives, Volume 1. (ed. Frank Moore). Search the whole document.

Found 104 total hits in 17 results.

1 2
Europe (search for this): chapter 142
ering a dissolution of this Union to take place in any way whatever. There will be here only one nation and one government, and there will be the same republic and the same constitutional Union that have already survived a dozen national changes and changes of government in almost every other country. These will stand hereafter, as they are now, objects of human wonder and human affection. You have seen, on the eve of your departure, the elasticity of the national spirit, the vigor of the national Government, and the lavish devotion of the national treasures to this great cause. Tell M. Thouvenel, then, with the highest consideration and good feeling, that the thought of a dissolution of this Union, peaceably or by force, has never entered into the mind of any candid statesman here, and it is high time that it be dismissed by statesmen in Europe. I am, sir, respectfully, your obedient servant, Wm. H. Seward. to William L. Dayton, Esq., &c. &c. --N. Y. Evening Post, May 6.
United States (United States) (search for this): chapter 142
ulkner to Mr. Seward. Legation of the United States, Paris, April 15, 1861. Honorable Wm. H. Sembraced the views of the President of the United States upon the difficulties which now disturbed appeal would be made before long by the Confederate States to foreign powers, and among others to tpated might arise upon the demand of the Confederate States for recognition of their independence; t wishes and views of the Government of the United States, and that the only request which I would nrests of France; and the Government of the United States might rest well assured that no hasty or pion of the independence of the so-called Confederate States, is entirely satisfactory, although it wency or plausiblity, has passed away. The United States waited patiently while their authority was open, flagrant, deadly war, to compel the United States to acquiesce in the dismemberment of the Union. The United States have accepted this civil war as an inevitable necessity. The constitution[6 more...]
Department de Ville de Paris (France) (search for this): chapter 142
Doc. 137.-diplomatic correspondence. Mr. Faulkner to Mr. Seward. Legation of the United States, Paris, April 15, 1861. Honorable Wm. H. Seward, Secretary of State: Sir: I called to-day upon M. Thouvenel, at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and was promptly admitted to an interview. Agreeably to your request, I handed to him a copy of the Inaugural Address of President Lincoln, and added that I was instructed by you to say to him, that it embraced the views of the President of thenstructions heretofore transmitted to you, will show you the President's views on the subject Mr. Faulkner has discussed, and these will be your guide, notwithstanding any different opinion your predecessor may have expressed or left on record at Paris. No. 119 bears date of the 15th April last, and contains a report of an official conversation, and also of an unofficial one, held between Mr. Faulkner and M. Thouvenel. In the former conversation, M. Thouvenel asked Mr. Faulkner whether ther
France (France) (search for this): chapter 142
the events going on in the United States might be productive of some possible inconvenience to the people and subjects of France, but he was determined that those inconveniences shall be made as light and transient as possible, and so far as it may rle an appeal would be made before long by the Confederate States to foreign powers, and among others to the Government of France, for the recognition of their independence; that no such appeal having yet been made, it was premature and out of place t in its integrity was to be desired for the benefit of the people of the North and South, as well as for the interests of France; and the Government of the United States might rest well assured that no hasty or precipitate action would be taken on the disturbed condition of affairs at home, but at the same time gives us no information concerning the state of affairs in France. The instructions heretofore transmitted to you, will show you the President's views on the subject Mr. Faulkner has d
New Jersey (New Jersey, United States) (search for this): chapter 142
the fact to be known that whenever any such application shall be made, it will meet with opposition from the minister who shall then represent that Government at this court. I said to him that my mission at this court would soon terminate, and I should have no official connection with the question which it was anticipated might arise upon the demand of the Confederate States for recognition of their independence; that my place would soon be supplied by a distinguished citizen of the State of New Jersey, a gentleman who possessed the confidence of the President, who fully sympathized in his public views, and who would doubtless come fully instructed as to the then wishes and views of the Government of the United States, and that the only request which I would now make, and which would close all I had to say in the interview, was that no proposition recognizing the permanent dismemberment of the American Union shall be considered by the French Government until after the arrival and re
William H. Seward (search for this): chapter 142
Doc. 137.-diplomatic correspondence. Mr. Faulkner to Mr. Seward. Legation of the United States, Paris, April 15, 1861. Honorable Wm. H. Seward, Secretary of State: Sir: I called to-day upon M. Thouvenel, at the Ministry of Foreign AffaiHonorable Wm. H. Seward, Secretary of State: Sir: I called to-day upon M. Thouvenel, at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and was promptly admitted to an interview. Agreeably to your request, I handed to him a copy of the Inaugural Address of President Lincoln, and added that I was instructed by you to say to him, that it embraced the views of the President of theh had already taken action on the subject. I am, very respectfully, your obedient servant, Charles J. Faulkner. Mr. Seward to Mr. Dayton. Department of State, Washington, May 4, 1861. Sir: The despatches of your predecessor, Nos. 117,red into the mind of any candid statesman here, and it is high time that it be dismissed by statesmen in Europe. I am, sir, respectfully, your obedient servant, Wm. H. Seward. to William L. Dayton, Esq., &c. &c. --N. Y. Evening Post, May 6.
Charles J. Faulkner (search for this): chapter 142
Doc. 137.-diplomatic correspondence. Mr. Faulkner to Mr. Seward. Legation of the United States, Paris, April 15, I am, very respectfully, your obedient servant, Charles J. Faulkner. Mr. Seward to Mr. Dayton. Department of Sf 5th of April last. It contains only an exposition of Mr. Faulkner's views of the policy which this Government ought to puyou, will show you the President's views on the subject Mr. Faulkner has discussed, and these will be your guide, notwithstanversation, and also of an unofficial one, held between Mr. Faulkner and M. Thouvenel. In the former conversation, M. Thouvenel asked Mr. Faulkner whether there is not some diversity of opinion in the Cabinet of the President as to the proper modehe relations of the States and the General Government. Mr. Faulkner, in reply, said that he had no information on the subje not now be discussed. In the unofficial conversation, Mr. Faulkner says that he himself expressed the opinion that force w
Tell M. Thouvenel (search for this): chapter 142
ring a dissolution of this Union to take place in any way whatever. There will be here only one nation and one government, and there will be the same republic and the same constitutional Union that have already survived a dozen national changes and changes of government in almost every other country. These will stand hereafter, as they are now, objects of human wonder and human affection. You have seen, on the eve of your departure, the elasticity of the national spirit, the vigor of the national Government, and the lavish devotion of the national treasures to this great cause. Tell M. Thouvenel, then, with the highest consideration and good feeling, that the thought of a dissolution of this Union, peaceably or by force, has never entered into the mind of any candid statesman here, and it is high time that it be dismissed by statesmen in Europe. I am, sir, respectfully, your obedient servant, Wm. H. Seward. to William L. Dayton, Esq., &c. &c. --N. Y. Evening Post, May 6.
Abraham Lincoln (search for this): chapter 142
Doc. 137.-diplomatic correspondence. Mr. Faulkner to Mr. Seward. Legation of the United States, Paris, April 15, 1861. Honorable Wm. H. Seward, Secretary of State: Sir: I called to-day upon M. Thouvenel, at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and was promptly admitted to an interview. Agreeably to your request, I handed to him a copy of the Inaugural Address of President Lincoln, and added that I was instructed by you to say to him, that it embraced the views of the President of the United States upon the difficulties which now disturbed the harmony of the American Union, and also due exposition of the general policy which it was the purpose of the Government to pursue, with a view to the preservation of domestic peace and the maintenance of the federal Union. Here M. Thouvenel asked if there was not some diversity of opinion in the Cabinet of the President as to the proper mode of meeting the difficulties which now disturbed the relations of the States and General Govern
William L. Dayton (search for this): chapter 142
r rupture of the Confederacy by causing the remaining southern States to make common cause with the States which had already taken action on the subject. I am, very respectfully, your obedient servant, Charles J. Faulkner. Mr. Seward to Mr. Dayton. Department of State, Washington, May 4, 1861. Sir: The despatches of your predecessor, Nos. 117, 119 and 120, have been received. Tho latter, acknowledging the receipt of your letter of recall, and announcing his intended return, requonal Government, and the lavish devotion of the national treasures to this great cause. Tell M. Thouvenel, then, with the highest consideration and good feeling, that the thought of a dissolution of this Union, peaceably or by force, has never entered into the mind of any candid statesman here, and it is high time that it be dismissed by statesmen in Europe. I am, sir, respectfully, your obedient servant, Wm. H. Seward. to William L. Dayton, Esq., &c. &c. --N. Y. Evening Post, May 6.
1 2