Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: March 2, 1861., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for Fauquier (Virginia, United States) or search for Fauquier (Virginia, United States) in all documents.

Your search returned 2 results in 2 document sections:

The Daily Dispatch: March 2, 1861., [Electronic resource], The National Crisis. (search)
y, Va. 37. Henry C. Reamey, Henry, Va. 38. Wm. P. Campbell, Monroe, Va. 39. Thos. A. Bohanon, Madison, Va. 40. Henry E. Jennings, Halifax, Va. 41. R. Heber Goods, Bedford, Va. 42. J. McCabe Horner, Chesterfield. Va. 43. Cyrus Doggett. Jr., Gloucester, Va. 44. John B. Brumback, Page, Va. 45. H. H. Miller, Rockingham, Va. 46. J. Wilmer Tompkins, Albemarle, Va. 47. John W. Bruffy, Augusta, Va. 48. William M. Thomas, Tazewell, Va. 49. Virgil Weaver, Fauquier, Va. 50. Rev. J. W. Miller. Richmond city. 51. Thos. L. Ingram, Lunenburg, Va. 52. Wm. Z. Heggle, Rockingham, N. C. 53. B. F. Raines, Sussex, Va. 54. Mason G. Ellzey, Loudoun, Va. 55. Jos. H. Wade, Henry, Va. 56. Clayton G. Coleman, Jr., Louisa, Va. 57. James C. Balley, Pearson co., N. C. 58. Wm. C. Jones, Highland, Va. 59. Thos. J. Reid, Dallas co., Ark. Prof. McCaw then announced the names of the fortunate competitors for the Warren Prize, which had been
The Daily Dispatch: March 2, 1861., [Electronic resource], Father vs. Son. (search)
Supreme Court of Appeals. --Present, Judges Allen, Daniel, Moncure, Robertson. The following decisions have been rendered since our last report: Want vs. Jennings and others. Argued by C. G. Griswold for the appellant, and Arthur A. Morson, and Tucker & Patton for appellees. Decree of the Circuit Court of Fauquier county affirmed. Smith vs. Smith's administrator and others. Argued by R. T. Daniel and John B. Young for the appellant, and James Lyons for the appellees. Decree of the Circuit Court of Henrico county reversed. Spratley's executor and others vs. Spratley and others. Argued by Jas. Alfred Jones and Conway Robinson for the appellants. No counsel for appellees. Decree of the Circuit Court of Surry county reversed. Pemberton against the Justices of the Hustings Court of the city of Richmond on an appeal from a decision of the Circuit Court of the city of Richmond refusing a rule to the said Pemberton to be directed to the Court of Hustings to show c