hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Matching Documents
The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.
Document | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
View all matching documents... |
Your search returned 691 results in 258 document sections:
The Daily Dispatch: February 6, 1862., [Electronic resource], The "Times" and our Commissioners. (search)
To the voters of the Richmond Congressional District.
--Vote for James Lyons, the able lawyer, the polished gentleman, the sound and sagacious statesman, the true Southern man, as shown by all his past political course.
Vote for James Lyons, because of his superior qualifications to represent you in the Confederate Congress.James Lyons, because of his superior qualifications to represent you in the Confederate Congress.
Vote for him, because of his early and able advocacy of the rights and interests of the slave holding States.
Vote for him because of his able and earnest advocacy of immediate secession upon the election of a Black Republican President, which would have enabled us to take and hold Fortress Monroe, one of the strongest forts in n we could elect.
Fellow citizens, forget party and the prejudices engendered during times of high party excitement, forget Whig, forget Democrat, and vote for James Lyons, who has more qualifications for the office, and claims to your support, than any other man in this district.
I have known him since I was a boy. I know, and y
The Daily Dispatch: February 7, 1862., [Electronic resource], Late Northern news. (search)
Commonwealth vs. John Hagan.
--The examination of John Hagan, before a called Court of Hustings, for alleged extortion in obtaining $40 from James Evans, begun on Thursday, and was concluded on yesterday, the Court determining to send Mr. Hagan on to be tried before Judge Lyons. Messrs. Caskie and Lyons made eloquent appeals in behalf of their client.
Mr. Hagan gave ball for his appearance.
Commonwealth vs. John Hagan.
--The examination of John Hagan, before a called Court of Hustings, for alleged extortion in obtaining $40 from James Evans, begun on Thursday, and was concluded on yesterday, the Court determining to send Mr. Hagan on to be tried before Judge Lyons. Messrs. Caskie and Lyons made eloquent appeals in behalf of their client.
Mr. Hagan gave ball for his appearance.
The issue.
--James Lyons and Wm. H. Macfarland are the competing candidates for Congress.
The one of the other will be certainly elected.
There are other candidates, but the issue had been made up before they announced themselves.
You may prefer some one of them, but to vote for either is to evade a choice between Lyons and Macfarland.
Which of these two will you choose?
That is practically the only question you have to determine now.
The recent course of Mr. Macfarland in the Cill do it again.
Yet he may he elected in spite of your opposition by division of the vote among several competitors.
Mr. Lyons is known to sympathize fully with the sentiment of the district, and would have been elected over Mr. Macfarland at the.
Rally, men, around him. It is no time to indulge your friends in the cold compliment of uneffactual votes.
James Lyons desires your support.
He is and has always been bound to the core, and will faithfully and worthily represent the fee
The Daily Dispatch: February 10, 1862., [Electronic resource], Election day. (search)
Election day.
--An election will be held to day to supply the vacancy in the Congressional representation from this district, caused by the death of Hon. John Tyler. Messrs. James Lyons, John Robertson, Robt. Saunders, Wm. H. McFarland, John B. Young, George W. Randolph, and Martin Meredith Lipscomb, are the candidates.
Polls open at sunrise.
The Daily Dispatch: February 11, 1862., [Electronic resource], Re-enlistment of volunteers.--no Coorcien. (search)
Supreme Court of Appeals.
--Present; John J. Allen, Wm. Daniel, R. C. L. Moncure, Wm. J. Robertson.
The following decisions were announced yesterday:
Payne vs. Payne and others.
Argued by Arthur A. Morson for the appellants and Wm. Green for the appellees, on an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of Culpeper county.
Decree reversed, and bill dismissed with costs.
Taylor vs. Robinson's adm'r, &c. Argued by Henry L. Brooke and John Randolph Tucker for the appellant, and James Lyons for the appellees, upon an appeal from decree, pronounced by the Circuit Court of Hanover county.
Decree reversed, injunction reinstated, and cause remanded to said circuit court for further proceedings to be had.
The Daily Dispatch: February 12, 1862., [Electronic resource], War Matters. (search)