hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Edward Porter Alexander, Military memoirs of a Confederate: a critical narrative 999 7 Browse Search
Brigadier-General Ellison Capers, Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 5, South Carolina (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 382 26 Browse Search
William Swinton, Campaigns of the Army of the Potomac 379 15 Browse Search
Edward Alfred Pollard, The lost cause; a new Southern history of the War of the Confederates ... Drawn from official sources and approved by the most distinguished Confederate leaders. 288 22 Browse Search
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 2. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.) 283 1 Browse Search
Horace Greeley, The American Conflict: A History of the Great Rebellion in the United States of America, 1860-65: its Causes, Incidents, and Results: Intended to exhibit especially its moral and political phases with the drift and progress of American opinion respecting human slavery from 1776 to the close of the War for the Union. Volume II. 243 11 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 37. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 233 43 Browse Search
An English Combatant, Lieutenant of Artillery of the Field Staff., Battlefields of the South from Bull Run to Fredericksburgh; with sketches of Confederate commanders, and gossip of the camps. 210 2 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Documents and Narratives, Volume 11. (ed. Frank Moore) 200 12 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Documents and Narratives, Volume 7. (ed. Frank Moore) 186 12 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: October 3, 1863., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for Longstreet or search for Longstreet in all documents.

Your search returned 17 results in 2 document sections:

The Daily Dispatch: October 3, 1863., [Electronic resource], article 1 (search)
began on the 3d June. McLaws's division, of Longstreet's corps, left Fredericksburg for Culpeper C.ogress were not arrested. The forces of Longstreet and Ewell reached Culpeper Court House by th soon as the enemy withdrew from his front. Longstreet moved from Culpeper Court-House on the 15th,isposed to advance upon the position held by Longstreet, the latter was withdrawn to the west side osition at Hancock, and, after the arrival of Longstreet and Hill at Chambersburg, was directed to mas corps having arrived, and two divisions of Longstreet's, our preparations were made accordingly. d Gen. Longstreet the right. In front of Gen. Longstreet the right. In front of Gen. Longstreet tGen. Longstreet the enemy held a position, from which if he could be driven it was thought that our army could be uself to attack. After a severe struggle, Longstreet succeeded in getting possession of and holdiades of Hill's corps were ordered to support Longstreet. The enemy in the meantime had strength[6 more...]
The Daily Dispatch: October 3, 1863., [Electronic resource], Federal account of the battle of Chickamauga. (search)
Federal account of the battle of Chickamauga. --The New York papers of the 30th, received yesterday through the courtesy of Hon. Robt. Ould, Commissioner of Exchange, contain detailed accounts of the battle of Chickamauga, or "Pigeon Mountain," as they call it. The fight of Saturday they regard as only the preliminary to the real battle which came off Sunday. They claim on Sunday to have lost no ground and to have repulsed Longstreet and Buckner, though they admit that "no substantial advantage had been won, and a large portion of the army was badly shattered. " The correspondent continues Saturday: While the struggle of Saturday ended in a drawn battle, that of Sunday resulted in a disastrous defeat. The failure of the first day was partly due to the greater numerical strength of the enemy, and partly to the deficient formation of our line of battle. That of the second is justly ascribed to improper tactics on the battle field, and above all to the absence of command.