hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 4. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.) 6 0 Browse Search
Robert Underwood Johnson, Clarence Clough Buell, Battles and Leaders of the Civil War. Volume 3. 4 0 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 12. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 3 1 Browse Search
Col. O. M. Roberts, Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 11.1, Texas (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 2 0 Browse Search
The Daily Dispatch: February 22, 1864., [Electronic resource] 1 1 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: February 22, 1864., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for Havis or search for Havis in all documents.

Your search returned 1 result in 1 document section:

The Daily Dispatch: February 22, 1864., [Electronic resource], Debate in the Yankee Congress. (search)
ens of other States are used for national purposes. Mr. Creswell (Md.) favored the amendment, stating that the slaveholders in the State of Maryland have furnished but few if any men for the war. Mr. Farnsworth (Ill.) said he would not put money into the pockets of slaveholders. It was their duty to put their slaves into the army without compensation. We put our sons into the army, and why should they not give their slaves. Mr. Smithers (Del.) would say to the gentleman from Kentucky (Mr. Clay) that the people of his State had no such scruples as the people of Kentucky are represented to have. There would be nothing more welcome to Delaware than to take her slaves from her. Mr. Mallory briefly maintained that according to the Constitution private property, including slaves, cannot be taken for public uses without compensation. Mr. Havis (Md) maintained that slaves do military duty, and therefore we do not owe the slaveholders anything for their services.