hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 2. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.) 191 19 Browse Search
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 4. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.) 126 8 Browse Search
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 3. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.) 98 12 Browse Search
Edward Porter Alexander, Military memoirs of a Confederate: a critical narrative 85 1 Browse Search
William A. Crafts, Life of Ulysses S. Grant: His Boyhood, Campaigns, and Services, Military and Civil. 67 13 Browse Search
Oliver Otis Howard, Autobiography of Oliver Otis Howard, major general , United States army : volume 1 63 5 Browse Search
John Harrison Wilson, The life of Charles Henry Dana 51 13 Browse Search
An English Combatant, Lieutenant of Artillery of the Field Staff., Battlefields of the South from Bull Run to Fredericksburgh; with sketches of Confederate commanders, and gossip of the camps. 42 12 Browse Search
Owen Wister, Ulysses S. Grant 40 2 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 37. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 36 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 3. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.). You can also browse the collection for Halleck or search for Halleck in all documents.

Your search returned 55 results in 4 document sections:

Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 3. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.), Book I:—the war on the Rapidan. (search)
he had criticised his superior officers caused Mr. Lincoln to fear that he might not be able to secure that passive obedience from his new subordinates which is so essential to success, and of which he had himself failed to set an example. General Halleck, whom he had never spared, was secretly hostile to him. But at that time he appeared to be the only man capable of shouldering Burnside's heavy legacy; and, after giving him some good advice, See the Appendix to this volume. Note A. the : out of eighty-two thousand soldiers and nearly three thousand officers who were not present for duty, more than one half of them had obtained leave of absence through irregular methods; Report of Hooker to Kelton, Asst. Adjutant-General to Halleck, dated Feb. 15, 1803.—Ed. the service of the outposts was neglected; the bonds of discipline were being loosened; gloom, home-sickness, and a disposition to criticise were becoming daily more and more prevalent among that large body of troops ly
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 3. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.), Book II:—--the Mississippi. (search)
the troops in the field. This situation, analogous to that which Halleck had occupied the previous year in the Federal armies of the West, ps whose camps ran the risk of being submerged. At the request of Halleck, he had sent back these ships in ballast, as they were wanted in tr to save the second. In this instance he followed the example of Halleck, who, by persisting in preserving certain posts of an entirely relelsewhere. Grant, who knew the precise and methodical mind of General Halleck, with Mr. Stanton's ignorance of matters appertaining to the aompanied the army. On this very day, just as Grant was writing to Halleck, telling him that he should not be able to communicate with him agand his military advisers were frightened at Grant's rashness, and Halleck sent him at once a despatch in which he was directed to retrace hining of January. The Union general, despite the urgent request of Halleck, does not think it time as yet to attack his adversary, and the la
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 3. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.), Book III:—Pennsylvania. (search)
f Hooker and under the immediate direction of Halleck; the commander-in-chief of the Army of the Pe knowledge of which had reached Washington. Halleck, without daring to request Hooker's removal, erate capital. This permission was refused. Halleck tried to prove to him that it would be betterceed in convincingeither the President or General Halleck. He was told in reply not to mind Richmo it; and if Hooker had followed the advice of Halleck and Lincoln, recommending him to try to cut terations more or less plausible. Inasmuch as Halleck immediately granted to Hooker's successor whato perform the arduous task imposed upon him. Halleck's mistrust of Hooker was indeed no secret. Tompromise the fate of the army, on receipt of Halleck's reply—which he found at Frederick on his restake: if its object was to avoid displeasing Halleck, it was taken in vain, for the evacuation of valry in check. The communications between Halleck and Meade, frequently interrupted by Stuart, [19 more...]
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 3. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.), Book IV:—Third winter. (search)
term, others refused; and Meade finally asked Halleck not to send him any troops having less than te reinforcements time to join the army, while Halleck, far from hurrying him, advises him to wait fe announced the result of the council of war, Halleck replied to him frankly, directing him to summonfederates to Virginia on the 15th of July, Halleck has ordered General Kelley to cross the rapidoffensive, even without asking the consent of Halleck. But his forces are scattered, and must be cof Chickamauga become known than, on the 23d, Halleck was ordering Meade to detach from his army anssistance of the Federal armies of the West. Halleck's order was received by Meade just at the momganized arrive in haste from New York. To do Halleck justice, it must be said that he does not shalexandria Railroad for the Aquia Creek line. Halleck forbids Meade to execute it, urging, as it ap operations to the lower Rappahannock, since Halleck forbids it. He resolves to cross the Rapidan [7 more...]