hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
The Daily Dispatch: may 30, 1861., [Electronic resource] 21 1 Browse Search
The Daily Dispatch: October 11, 1862., [Electronic resource] 1 1 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Your search returned 22 results in 4 document sections:

The Daily Dispatch: may 30, 1861., [Electronic resource], article 8 (search)
confiscation. Under this head, the N. Y. Herald says: "Under the caption of 'Confiscation — Past and Present,' Greeley comes out in an elaborate article in favor of confiscation for political causes — that old relic of barbarism abolished on," which every one knows is an unparliamentary phrase in the North. If Bennett is less ferocious than the open robber Greeley, it is only because he is not lost to all sense of shame. He has still some faint idea, or pretends to have, that robbeea, or pretends to have, that robbery and plunder are not essential features of military operations, whilst Greeley cries aloud for every shade and degree of crime, and Greeley, we believe, is the real exponent of the policy of the Administration. ea, or pretends to have, that robbery and plunder are not essential features of military operations, whilst Greeley cries aloud for every shade and degree of crime, and Greeley, we believe, is the real exponent of the policy of the Administratio
The Daily Dispatch: may 30, 1861., [Electronic resource], Murdering commenced. (search)
The two Northern factions. The grand political scamps, Bennett and Greeley, are once more by the ears. We make the following extracts from the Herald for two objects: to show the peace and harmony of these loving brethren, who know each other so well that neither can possibly be mistaken in the character of the other, and to place before the Southern public the fact, evident from these and other manifestations, that there are in the North two factions, having distinct and antagonistic obtructions, publish in their last daily issue an elaborate historical account of "Denmark Vesey's Insurrection in South Carolina," from that venomous abolition periodical, the Boston Atlantic Monthly; and thus our old white-coated philanthropist, Greeley, gloats over it:-- "The system of slavery — ever accursed — has not improved in these forty years. The hand of the taskmaster has not grown lighter, nor are the bonds worn with greater ease. The nature of the slave changes not, nor does t
The Daily Dispatch: may 30, 1861., [Electronic resource], By the ears. (search)
ightful state of harmony in the New York editorial camp: Massa Greeley in a Rage.--The Hon. Massa Greeley, though a small beer philanthropist, is a monstrous big liar when the truth is against him. We say big liar, because the qualification of this charge in dainty phraseology with Greeley would be like "casting pearls before swine." In holding up before the world the identity of his views are philosophers who, even in this position, would stick to the truth. Not so with Philosopher Greeley. He flies into a rage, against the Herald, the Herald editor and the Herald office, he hangs acivil war shall be punished — such abolition and disunion agitators of the last twenty years as Greeley, Garrison, and Giddings will be among the list of traitors hung up like herrings to dry in the ings will be among the list of traitors hung up like herrings to dry in the sun. Greeley, particularly, has been a great sinner, and withal a very dirty one. Let him be washed, or let him retire.
The Daily Dispatch: October 11, 1862., [Electronic resource], My uncle's cashier. (search)
Lydia Maria Child on amalgamation. --Lydia Maria Child, who begged the favor of Gov. Wise to go to Charlestown, Va., and attend upon old John Brown, favors the Hon. Massa Greeley, of the New York Tribune, with a letter, from which we extract the following endorsement of, and encouragement for, amalgamation. Such a beastly proposition deserves no comment. Whether amalgamation would take place legally, as it now does illegally, if the slaves were freed, is not a question susceptible of proof. It must, of course, remain a matter of opinion till experience furnishes evidence. But it seems to me quite superfluous to trouble ourselves about it. If there is an instinctive antipathy between the races it will take care of itself, as natural antipathies and attractions are always sure to do. If there is not any natural antipathy, then the horror of amalgamation has no rational foundation. My own opinion is, that there is not a natural antipathy between white and colored people. My