Browsing named entities in Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 4. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.). You can also browse the collection for U. S. Grant or search for U. S. Grant in all documents.

Your search returned 200 results in 5 document sections:

Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 4. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.), Book I:—eastern Tennessee. (search)
ry Hill and Johnston had succeeded in breaking Grant's lines. In the preceding volume we did not regular army if he would win a victory before Grant and Hooker—a humiliating offer which he rejectd near Jackson, Mississippi, in consequence of Grant's movements. In fine, desertions were thinnin resume the offensive. A considerable part of Grant's army, having no longer any enemy confrontingld corps, the Ninth, sent to the assistance of Grant in the first days of June; but this body, detaon the sickly banks of the lower Mississippi. Grant's army also was wholly in like circumstances. Lee to dispense with a part of his army; that Grant could not detain Johnston, whose traces he hadlow Rosecrans to follow up the enemy, and that Grant should take his troops by railway to meet Bragof this Vol. IV.-7 plan. Once at Tuscumbia, Grant would at last have been enabled to give Rosecr, which covers Chattanooga, as the opponent of Grant had abandoned Haynes' Bluff. We have alluded [5 more...]
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 4. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.), Book II:—the siege of Chattanooga. (search)
he 24th it is ascending the river. However, Grant has readily understood that in thus detaching ion that the enemy had not seriously damaged. Grant asked only one week from the evening of the 28ed beyond the mouth of the South Chickamauga. Grant had easily perceived it, and conceived the proiver, and constructing long platforms, so that Grant was going to have in a few days a train of a huld have sufficed to reveal them to the enemy, Grant might have apprehended something worse, becaushortly thereafter, toward half-past 3 o'clock, Grant, who has followed up all the engagement from tsterhaus, was thus detained on the left shore: Grant, with a view to avoid fresh delays, had ordereof the whole Federal army, cannot have escaped Grant's attention. He is aware of the difficulties East Tennessee. Thomas has likewise received Grant's orders. He is to remain at Chattanooga, wheto resume his march on Cleburne's tracks. But Grant, hastening up at the prolonged roar of the can[117 more...]
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 4. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.), Book III:—the Third winter. (search)
rting this movement and employing his cavalry, Grant instructs General Elliott to quit Alexandria whe 24th. The first has thus been cognizant of Grant's demonstration on Indian Hill. The abrupt si made an effort to repair the delay with which Grant has so sharply reproached him. Having started he time had come to raise the siege. Besides, Grant, believing that the capitulation of Knoxville o which Sherman's prolonged absence may expose Grant. He imagines, very wrongly, that Bragg will aing with him only two of the divisions sent by Grant to his assistance. After having joined Ransomere Sherman has established his headquarters. Grant has resolved to scatter his armies during the atly discouraged. Desertion increases so that Grant is obliged to take special steps to return to f a new campaign. Banks shares his views, and Grant has therefore hastened to send him, in the ears composed of the old Logan brigade, which General Grant sent with a regiment of cavalry to explore[13 more...]
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 4. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.), Book IV:—the war in the South-West. (search)
ct New Orleans. It was painful, however, to Grant and Sherman to confine to a simply defensive pich General W. Sooy Smith, chief of cavalry of Grant's army, and who was to take the field at the s. Behind this line, thus strongly occupied by Grant's soldiers, extends the vast region conquered error he had already committed by dismembering Grant's powerful army the day after the victory. A serve under the command of Sherman or Steele. Grant, on the contrary, considering, with good reasoxandria, on the 27th of March, a despatch from Grant containing positive instructions for him to seook so little account of his obligation and of Grant's and Sherman's advice that he did not start ers of the Thirteenth corps, whom an order from Grant had recalled from the coast of Texas, so that hall find again, under the immediate orders of Grant in Virginia, some of the troops which figured his defeat, his troops were left in Florida. Grant had to be invested with the supreme command be[23 more...]
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 4. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.), Addenda by the Editor. (search)
ieut.-col. R. M. Martin. 1st Louisiana. 2d Tennessee. 5th Tennessee. 12th Tennessee Battalion. 16th Tennessee BattalionCapt. J. Q. Arnold. Louisiana Battery (one section). Organization of the United States forces commanded by Major-General U. S. Grant, engaged in the Chattanooga-Rossville Cam-paign, November 23-27, 1863. Army of the Cumberland. Maj.-gen. George H. Thomas. General headquarters. 1st Ohio Sharpshooters, Capt. G. M. Barber. 10th Ohio Infantry, Lieut.-col. Wi. Dean. Artillery. Capt. Henry Dillon. Cogswell's Illinois BatteryCapt. William Cogswell. 6th Wisconsin BatteryLieut. Samuel F. Clark. 12th Wisconsin BatteryCapt. William Zickerick. Casualties in the Union forces under Major-General U. S. Grant, engaged in the Chattanooga-Rossville campaign, November 23-27, 1863. includes skirmishes at Orchard knob (or Indian Hill) and Bushy knob (23d); engagement at Lookout Mountain and skirmish in front of Missionary Ridge (24th); battle