Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: July 17, 1863., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for Farr or search for Farr in all documents.

Your search returned 10 results in 1 document section:

The Daily Dispatch: July 17, 1863., [Electronic resource], No cause for Despondency. (search)
rgan's explanation of the whole matter is this; Farr and himself were blockade runners, having made e conceived it a duty to save what he could for Farr, supposing that Farr would do as much for him. Farr would do as much for him. After Farr's vessel was captured in Washington, and not knowing where F. was, the prisoner started tFarr's vessel was captured in Washington, and not knowing where F. was, the prisoner started to run the blockade. Learning that Farr's letter bag had been stolen by Capt. Dickinson, Morgan procFarr's letter bag had been stolen by Capt. Dickinson, Morgan proceeded to recover it, when he took that and another filled with Farr's goods, and started to VirginiaFarr's goods, and started to Virginia. On arriving in Richmond Morgan had Farr's goods sold in the owner's name, and held the money subjFarr's goods sold in the owner's name, and held the money subject to his order. He also attempted to have the notes collected for Farr. leaving the funds in theFarr. leaving the funds in the hands of his banker till Farr arrived. Blockade runners, it is said, feel it a duty to save for eaFarr arrived. Blockade runners, it is said, feel it a duty to save for each other all they can, and to benefit Farr and not himself, Morgan says, was the cause of his bringiFarr and not himself, Morgan says, was the cause of his bringing over the bags. After hearing the evidence the Mayor dismissed the warrant, and Morgan was discha