Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: February 14, 1862., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for Tom Crittenden or search for Tom Crittenden in all documents.

Your search returned 9 results in 2 document sections:

The Daily Dispatch: February 14, 1862., [Electronic resource], From Kentucky. (search)
That the right wing of the Army of Kentucky has been damaged by the late ill-advised battle, is not to be denied. Crittenden, through a miscalculation of the strength of the enemy, and, it is believed, contrary to express instructions from Gen.lled the renewal of hope. Various were the reasons assigned for our defeat. Many of them were not complimentary to Gen. Crittenden. But when the facts came to be sifted, his conduct continued to appear in a better light, until now there is no whisper against his character. The whole course of criticism is tersely summed up in four words — Crittenden erred in judgment. The loss of General Zollicoffer is a public calamity. To a love of the South, which permeated every fibre of his natuRussellville. Here Floyd and Buckner are posted with a certain number of men, and are anxious to measure swords with Tom Crittenden. It was a little amusing to see the antics which this "bright son of an aged parent" cut before our troops came to
The Daily Dispatch: February 14, 1862., [Electronic resource], Address from a South Carolina (?) lady at Albany in Denunciation of the South. (search)
Justice to Gen. Crittenden. We had an interview yesterday with Capt. Henry Ewing, Acting Assistant Adjutant-General, and Ald to Gen. Zollicoffer in the late battle at Fishing Creek. It will beoses; and we now have Capt. Ewing's assurance that the account, so far as it reflected upon Gen. Crittenden, is a sheer fabrication of the writer. His testimony, as well as that of other officers wiould be improbable even in the absence of his own denial, but justice to him, as well as to Gen. Crittenden, demands that we should disabuse the public mind of any impression that might have been created by a perusal of the letter in question. With regard to the earlier career of Gen. Crittenden, which has recently been a theme of discussion it may be proper to add here, that soon after theefused to recognize a vacancy; so he was retained in his position.--It has been stated that Gen. Crittenden was dismissed from the old service; but the above is the only occasion on which he was befo