hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
The Daily Dispatch: January 18, 1865., [Electronic resource] 3 3 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: January 18, 1865., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for Colenso or search for Colenso in all documents.

Your search returned 3 results in 2 document sections:

Literary items. Among the works announced for immediate publication in London are "A Jewish Reply to Bishop Colenso on the Pentateuch," by the Jewish Association for the Diffusion of Religious Knowledge; Mr. Edwards's new book on "Libraries and their Founders;" "Major-General McClellan and the Campaign on the Yorktown Peninsula," by Frederick Milnes Edge, late American correspondent of The Morning Star; a new and revised edition of Rask's Anglo-Saxon Grammar; the fifth volume of Professor Horace Hayman Wilson's works; "Sea Sickness, its Nature and Treatment," by Dr. John Chapman; "Lessons from the World of Matter and the World of Man," by Theodore Parker; "Zulu-Land, or Life among the Zulu-Kafirs of Natal and Zulu-Land," with illustrations, by Lewis Grout; a translation of Comte's "View of Positivism," by Dr. J. H. Bridges; and a new book on India, by Major Evans Bell. The eighth volume of the "History of Modern States," which contains the history of England from the conclu
The case of Bishop Colenso. --The case of Bishop Colenso has come before the Privy Council in England. He does not merely appeal to the Queen in Council against the sentence of deposition pronounced upon him by the Bishop of Cape Town on the 16th of December last, for he also denies the validity of that sentence and the jurisdiction on which it purports to be founded. On this ground he prays the Queen, through the Judicial Committee, to declare that the letters patent under which he holdBishop Colenso has come before the Privy Council in England. He does not merely appeal to the Queen in Council against the sentence of deposition pronounced upon him by the Bishop of Cape Town on the 16th of December last, for he also denies the validity of that sentence and the jurisdiction on which it purports to be founded. On this ground he prays the Queen, through the Judicial Committee, to declare that the letters patent under which he holds his own Episcopal office constitute an indefeasible title until they shall be recalled for some legal cause of forfeiture, and that the letters patent, by virtue, of which the Bishop of Cape Town claims to have acted, were unduly obtained from her Majesty, and cannot, for other reasons, affect his own rights. Should the opinion of the court be adverse to him on this point, he further prays that his petition should be heard by way of appeal from the sentence of which he complains, and thereby