Your search returned 44 results in 23 document sections:

the officers of the line, Captain Hammond, and Lieutenants George Given and Johnson, company D ; Captain Taylor and Lieutenants McClintic arid Larew, of company E; Captain Coyner and Lieutenants Cabell, Paxton, and Moore, company F; Captain Rowan, Lieutenants Pack and Shanklin, company A; Captain Johnston, Lieutenants Canon and Torbough, company B; Captain Dews, Lieutenants Easly and Darlington, (the latter commanding the infirmary corps,) of company C; Captain Bailey, Lieutenants Hale and Belcher, company H; Captain Gilliam, Lieutenants Wilson, Heslip, and Tucker, company K; Captain Tompkins, (killed,) Lieutenants Ingraham and Kelly, company G; Lieutenant George, commanding company I, aided by Lieutenant Stephenson and Lilly, (the latter killed,) all displayed conspicuous gallantry. I desire to notice, particularly, the good conduct of Lieutenant George, not only throughout the engagements in which the regiment participated, but for past merits while in charge of company I, in fa
ch have been employed have been much modified by the experience in boring the oil-wells of the petroleum region. A great impetus was given to the exercise of ingenuity in this line by the exigencies of this branch of industry; the inventions including boringtools, toolgrabs, tool-jars, derricks, rodcouplings, reamers, welltubes and couplings, tube — packing, seed-bags, ejectors, and engines specifically adapted to sinking the shaft and raising the oil. The boring of the artesian well at Belcher's Sugar Refinery, St. Louis, was effected by a simple wedgeshaped drill, the size of which varied according to the diameter of the bore; this drill was screwed to a wrought-iron bar 30 feet long and about 2 1/2 inches diameter, weighing several hundred pounds. To the bar was screwed a pair of slips, so that the drilling was effected by the weight of the bar alone. To this were fastened the poles, each of which was 30 feet long. These were screwed together, and were made of two pieces of
1. (d.) Stationary Shuttles. 12,015RobertsonNov. 28, 1854. 17,366EllithorpeMay 26, 1857. 19,662ParkerMar. 16, 1858. 1. (d.) Stationary Shuttles. (continued). No.Name.Date. 20,699ComfortJune 29, 1858. 27,279DoppFeb. 28, 1860. 34,988SmithApr. 15, 1862. 56,020DulaneyJuly 3, 1866. 62,986WillsonMar. 19, 1867. 105,631BletcherJuly 26, 1870. 2. By revolving Hooks. (a.) Wheeler & Wilson Pattern. 8,296WilsonAug. 12, 1851. 9,041WilsonJune 15, 1852. 10,878CrosbyMay 9, 1854. 16,710BelcherMar. 3, 1857. 22,961MarchFeb. 15, 1859. 24,455GoodwynJune 21, 1859. 24,881MortonJuly 26, 1859. 24,937HaydenAug. 2, 1859. 25,043PrattAug. 9, 1859. 25,059TapleyAug. 9, 1859. 25,223StoddardAug. 23, 1859. 26,948JohnsonJan. 24, 1860. (Reissue.)913WilsonFeb. 28, 1860. (Reissue.)914WilsonFeb. 28, 1860. 30,615CollinsNov. 13, 1860. 33,341FolgerSept. 24, 1861. 36,591WilkinsSept. 30, 1862. 38,076WilkinsMar. 31, 1863. 40,000Tracy et al.Sept. 15, 1863. 40,589SecorNov. 10, 1863. 4
Thomas Wentworth Higginson, Henry Walcott Boynton, Reader's History of American Literature, Chapter 2: the secular writers (search)
odd moments during the journey. A kinsman rode with her as far as Dedham, where she went, as was apparently the custom in that period, to the minister's house to wait for the stage. She declined to stay there over night, but was escorted by Madam Belcher, the minister's wife, to the tavern to seek for a guide. The tavernkeeper's son offered his services, and she thus proceeds:-- Upon this, to my no small surprise, son John arose [the landlord's son], and gravely demanded what I would giby bestowing what she laid out in house-keeping, upon them. Said her son would be of age the 7th of August. I said it might be inconvenient for her to dwell with her daughter-in-law, who must be mistress of the house. I gave her a piece of Mr. Belcher's cake and ginger-bread wrapped up in a clean sheet of paper: told her of her father's kindness to me when Treasurer, and I Constable. My daughter Judith was gone from me and I was more lonesome — might help to forward one another in our jour
usetts advised concession, lest parliament should interfere; but 1729. the representatives answered, It is better that the liberties of the people should be taken from them, than given up by themselves. Burnet, dying, bequeathed the contest to Belcher, his successor. The assembly 1730. of Massachusetts, it was said in his instructions, for some years last past, have attempted, by unwarrantable practices, to weaken, if not cast off, the obedience they owe to the crown, and the dependence which all colonies ought to have on their mother country; and an appeal to parliament was formally menaced. The general court still persevered in its stubbornness; and, at last, as Belcher obtained leave of the crown to accept the annual grants, the controversy subsided, leaving victory to the strong will of Massachusetts. In 1733, the province of Massachusetts Bay pre- 1733. sented a memorial to the house of commons, praying to be heard by counsel on the subject of grievances, Dalrymple's R
ccupation, were pleaded against claims derived from grants of an English king, led to confusion which the rules of the English law could not remedy. The people of whole counties could not be driven from their homesteads, or imprisoned in jails; Belcher, Belcher to the Board of Trade, Jan., 1749. the temporizing governor, confessed that he could not bring the delegates into measures for suppressing the wicked spirit of rebellion. The proprietors, who had purchased the long dormant claim to Belcher to the Board of Trade, Jan., 1749. the temporizing governor, confessed that he could not bring the delegates into measures for suppressing the wicked spirit of rebellion. The proprietors, who had purchased the long dormant claim to a large part of the province, made common cause with men in office, invoked British interposition, and accused their opponents of throwing off the king's authority and treasonably and boldly denying his title to New Jersey. These appeals were to tally with and accre- chap II. 1748} Dec. dit the representation from New-York. C. Colden to Clinton, 12 January, 1749. Compare too Hamilton's Speech to the Assembly of the Jerseys at Perth Amboy. Such was the aspect in which official records
ixed maxim and principle. Report of Facts agreed on by the Board of Trade 26 July, 1749, in F. J. Paris to James Alexander, 26 July, 1749. Board of Trade to Gov. Belcher, of New Jersey, 28 July, 1749. The English ministry chap. III.} 1749. viewed it as a narrow question, relating to a subordinate branch of executive administraThus had the future colonial policy of England been shadowed forth to statesmen, who were very willing to adopt it. Morris, the chief justice of New Jersey, Gov. Belcher to Partridge, 15 Nov., 1750. interested in lands in that province, and trained by his father to a hatred of popular power, was much listened to; and the indefa Clinton to the Board of Trade. temper of American assemblies, this invitation was not generally accepted, Belcher of New Jersey to Clinton, 18 April, 1751. Belcher's Letter Books, VII. 78, 79, 117. though it forms one important step in the progress of America towards union. While Pennsylvania, in strife with its proprieta
to the Lt. Governor of Pennsylvania. New Jersey, now a royal government, enjoyed, chap. VI.} 1754. with the aged Belcher, comparative tranquillity. The generality of the people he found to be very rustical, and deficient in learning. Gov. Belcher to the Earl of Leven. To the Calvinist governor the Quakers of this province seemed to want orthodoxy in the principles of religion; but he parried for them the oppressive disposition of the Board of Trade, and the rapacity of the great claimants of lands, who held seats in the Council. I have to steer, he would say, between Scylla and Charybdis; to please the king's ministers at home, and a touchy people here; to luff for one, and bear away for another. Belcher to Sir Peter Warren. Sheltered by its position, New Jersey refused to share the expense of Indian alliances, often left its own annual expenses unprovided for, and, instead of showing zeal in assuming the burdens of war, its gentle and most obstinate enthusiasts trusted
ght never occur; so he advised against receiving any of the French inhabitants to take the oath, and for the removal of all of them from the province. Mr. Chief Justice Belcher's Opinion in Council as to the removal of the French Inhabitants in Nova Scotia, 28 July, 1755. That the cruelty might have no palliation, letters ar region south of the Ristigouche; Petition of the French Acadians at Miramichi, presented to De Vaudreuil, the Governor of Canada, in July 1756. Compare Lieut. Gov. Belcher to Lords of Trade, 14 April, 1761. some found rest on the banks of the St. John's and its branches; some found a lair in their native forests; some were cha May, 1760. When Canada surrendered, hatred with its worst venom pursued the fifteen hundred, chap. VIII.} 1755. who remained south of the Ristigouche. Lieut. Gov. Belcher to Lords of Trade, 14 April, 1761. Once those who dwelt in Pennsylvania presented a humble petition to the Earl of Loudoun, then the British commander-in-ch
the previous year, five thousand men. To meet the past expense, the little colony incurred heavy debts, and, learning political economy from native thrift, appointed taxes on property to discharge them. The whole continent was exerting its utmost strength, and eager to prove its loyalty. New Jersey, in which the fencible men in time of peace would have been about fifteen thousand, had already lost one thousand men, and yet voted to raise one thousand more. Gov. Bernard (successor to Belcher) to Secretary W. Pitt, Perth Amboy, 20 March, 1759. Its yearly expenditure for the service of the war was equal to about five dollars for each living being in the province. Such was the aid willingly furnished to an administration which respected colonial liberty. To encounter the preparations of England and America, Canada received scanty supplies of provi- chap. XIV.} 1759. sions from France. The king, wrote the minister to Montcalm, the king relies on your zeal and obstinacy of co