Browsing named entities in Alfred Roman, The military operations of General Beauregard in the war between the states, 1861 to 1865. You can also browse the collection for Badeau or search for Badeau in all documents.

Your search returned 5 results in 3 document sections:

Alfred Roman, The military operations of General Beauregard in the war between the states, 1861 to 1865, Chapter 20: (search)
Wallace, a portion of which was still held by the remainder of that division, with some of McClernand's regiments, and fragments of Sherman's, on their right. In rear of Webster's guns was also Hurlbut's division, General Hurlbut's Report, Record of the Rebellion, vol. IV. p. 401. with Veatch's brigade now reattached, and two of Stuart's regiments, all of these reinforced by numbers rallied from the broken commands. General Grant having arrived on the field at one o'clock P. M., General Badeau says, eight o'clock A. M. or about that time, had been busy at this work since three o'clock. The line of bluffs masked all view of the river; but, in fact, General Buell's Army of the Ohio was also now arriving from Savannah, on the opposite bank, below Pittsburg Landing, and Ammen's brigade, of Nelson's advance division, had been thrown across and placed in support of Webster's battery, at five o'clock. Generals Buell and Nelson were both present on the field. General Nelson's Repor
Alfred Roman, The military operations of General Beauregard in the war between the states, 1861 to 1865, Chapter 22: (search)
ed by us, nor does it, in any way, impair the force of what is said in Van Horne's History of the Army of the Cumberland. The discussion of this point has made it clear that not only Sherman's division, but the entire Federal army, was taken by surprise. That General Sherman should deny it to-day, with such bitterness of feeling towards those who prefer the testimony of facts to his unsubstantiated assertions, seems the result of an after-thought, which involves him in inconsistency. In Badeau's Military History of U. S. Grant we read as follows: Vol. i. pp. 71, 72. . . . On the 4th (April) the enemy felt Sherman's front in force, but nothing serious came of it, and the opinion of that commander was decided that no probability of an immediate engagement existed. Grant rode out on the day after (the 5th) to Sherman's lines, and concurred with him in this judgment. They were both mistaken, for the skirmish was the reconnoissance of the enemy, preliminary to the battle of
Alfred Roman, The military operations of General Beauregard in the war between the states, 1861 to 1865, Chapter 24: (search)
llowing remarks: The prisoners taken were few, and Pope was censured for making a statement of fact which he neither made nor authorized. Ibid. p. 191. General Badeau, after speaking of the evacuation of Corinth and the ineffectual pursuit by the Federal army, terminating, on the 10th of June, by the withdrawal of General Bis command: There is every indication that the enemy will attack our left this morning, as troops have been moving in that direction for some time. And, says General Badeau, the largest army ever assembled west of the Alleghanies was drawn out in line of battle, awaiting an assault. Military History of U. S. Grant, vol. i. p. 1ousand, General Beauregard says forty-five thousand effective, exclusive of cavalry. invested by an army of fully one hundred and twenty-five thousand, General Badeau puts the number at one hundred and twenty thousand bayonets, and refers to the field returns of General Halleck's forces at Corinth. disappeared from the fron