hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Matching Documents
The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.
Document | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
View all matching documents... |
Your search returned 36 results in 33 document sections:
Samuel Ball Platner, Thomas Ashby, A Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome,
CONCORDIA, AEDES, TEMPLUM
(search)
Samuel Ball Platner, Thomas Ashby, A Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome,
M. FULVIUS FLACCUS, DOMUS
(search)
M. FULVIUS FLACCUS, DOMUS
near the north corner of the Palatine, destroyed
after the murder of its owner in 121 B.C. The house of Catulus was
erected on its site (Cic. de domo 102, 114 ; Val. Max. vi. 3. I c).
Samuel Ball Platner, Thomas Ashby, A Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome,
FORNIX FABIANUS
(search)
FORNIX FABIANUS
FORNIX FABIORUM
an honorary arch erected on or over the
Sacra via at the east end of the forum by Q. Fabius Allobrogicus in
121 B.C. to commemorate his victory over the Allobroges (fornix: Cic. pro
Plane. 17; de or. ii. 267; in Verr. i. 19; Schol. pp. 133, 393, 396;
Orell.; arcus: Sen. dial. ii. I. 3; Schol. Pers. iv. 49; vit. Salonini I).
This was the first arch of the kind in or near the forum, and was restored
by the grandson of the builder in 56 B.C. (CIL i². 762=vi. 1303). Among
the fragments discovered in 1540-46 (LS ii. 196), in 1882 (NS 1882, 222-6),
and later, are the nine travertine voussoirs and the archivolt, which
have hitherto been attributed to it. These really belong to the portico of the DOMUS AUREA (p. 168).
It was therefore believed that the
arch was single, 3.945 metres in diameter, and built of tufa and peperino
with travertine facings (PAS ii. 28). Three inscriptions were also found
(CIL i². p. 198 and p. 542, No. 763 =vi. 1304ab ; DE i. 649)
Samuel Ball Platner, Thomas Ashby, A Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome,
FORUM (ROMANUM S. MAGNUM)
(search)
Samuel Ball Platner, Thomas Ashby, A Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome,
LUCUS FURRINAE
(search)
Samuel Ball Platner, Thomas Ashby, A Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome, Chronological Index to Dateable Monuments (search)
Be'stia
1. L. Calpurnius Bestia, tribune of the plebs, B. C. 121, obtained in his tribuneship the recall of P. Popillius Laenas, who had been banished through the efforts of C. Gracchus in 123. (Cic. Brut. 34; comp. Veil. Pat. 2.7; Plut. C. Gracch. 4.)
This made him popular with the aristocratical party, who then had the chief power in the state; and it was through their influence doubtless that he obtained the consulship in 111.
The war against Jugurtha was assigned to him.
He prosecuted it at first with the greatest vigour; but when Jugurtha offered him and his legate, M. Scaurus, large sums of money, he concluded a peace with the Numidian without consulting the senate, and returned to Rome to hold the comitia. His conduct excited the greatest indignation at Rome, and the aristocracy was obliged to yield to the wishes of the people, and allow an investigation into the whole matter.
A bill was introduced for the purpose by C. Mamilius Limetanus, and three commissioners or judges (qu
Bitui'tus
or as the name is found in in scriptions, BETULTUS, a king of the Arverni in Gaul. When the proconsul Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus undertook the war in B. C. 121 against the Allobroges, who were joined by the Arverni under Bituitus, these Gallic tribes were defeated near the town of Vindalium.
After this first disaster the Allobroges and Arverni made immense preparations to renew the contest with the Romans, and Bituitus again took the field with a very numerous army.
At the point where the Isara empties itself into the Rhodanus, the consul Q. Fabius Maximus, the grandson of Paullus, met the Gauls in the autumn of B. C. 121. Although the Romans were far inferior in numbers, yet they gained such a complete victory, that, according to the lowest estimate, 120,000 men of the army of Bituitus fell in the battle.
After this irreparable loss, Bituitus, who had been taken prisoner in an insidious manner by Cn. Domitius, was sent to Rome.
The senate, though disapproving of the conduc