Browsing named entities in Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 23. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones). You can also browse the collection for November 10th or search for November 10th in all documents.

Your search returned 2 results in 2 document sections:

Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 23. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), Historical sketch of the Rockbridge artillery, C. S. Army, by a member of the famous battery. (search)
ld be found was cofiscated and destroyed, but enough had been stowed away past finding, to keep them drunk all day. Whilst we were delayed in crossing the Shenandoah at the ferry, the belligerent stage of drunkenness was reached, and there was a free fight in which one good soldier had his leg broken, and had to be left there till he recovered the use of it. He rejoined the battery soon, and lost his life the next year in battle. We encamped that night at Berryville, and next day, Sunday, November 10th, reached the neighborhood of Winchester, and camped near Kernstown. After a few days spent there, we were moved nearer to Winchester, and went into camp about half a mile west of it near the Romney road, at a place known as Billy Wood's Thicket, a pleasant camp, well-sheltered by cedars, and at a convenient distance from town. Here the whole battery remained till Wednesday, January 1, 1862, excepting two guns, which were called out along with the infantry to assist in destroying Da
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 23. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), The Evacuation of Richmond, April 3, 1865, and the disastrous Conflagration incident Thereon. (search)
de you a statement, which was published, as to the origin of the Richmond fire of the 3d of April, 1865, based upon judicial records in the great insurance litigation which ensued. I observed in your last Friday's issue an affidavit of the late Mr. James A. Scott, filed in Vial's Executor vs. The Mutual Assurance Society of Virginia, a part of that litigation, in which interesting facts were given respecting the occurrences of the memorable occasion. [This appeared in the Dispatch of November 10th, and was in response to a query as stated in an issue of the paper November 3d. It is subjoined—Ed.] To-day, in looking over some old papers in my office for another purpose, I came across several letters that were written to me at the time I was making investigations, as counsel of the insured, for reliable information upon the subject, and which were intended to be used, if necessary, in the litigation (unless depositions should be required), but which I had no need to use. Since e