'ZDNET Recommends': What exactly does it mean?
ZDNET's recommendations are based on many hours of testing, research, and comparison shopping. We gather data from the best available sources, including vendor and retailer listings as well as other relevant and independent reviews sites. And we pore over customer reviews to find out what matters to real people who already own and use the products and services we’re assessing.
When you click through from our site to a retailer and buy a product or service, we may earn affiliate commissions. This helps support our work, but does not affect what we cover or how, and it does not affect the price you pay. Neither ZDNET nor the author are compensated for these independent reviews. Indeed, we follow strict guidelines that ensure our editorial content is never influenced by advertisers.
ZDNET's editorial team writes on behalf of you, our reader. Our goal is to deliver the most accurate information and the most knowledgeable advice possible in order to help you make smarter buying decisions on tech gear and a wide array of products and services. Our editors thoroughly review and fact-check every article to ensure that our content meets the highest standards. If we have made an error or published misleading information, we will correct or clarify the article. If you see inaccuracies in our content, please report the mistake via this form.
One of the cheapest foldable phones I've tested is not a Samsung or OnePlus
ZDNET's key takeaways
- The Motorola Razr (2024) is available now for $699.
- It's a refreshed version of the entry-level foldable Moto released last year, with an even bigger cover display, better performance, and all-day battery life.
- The camera remains the weakest point of the device, and you'll only get three major Android upgrades.
So, you're in the market for a folding phone. Whether it's your first one or your second or third -- if you refuse to go back to "normal" non-folding phones and are looking to save some money, there's no better foldable on the market today than the Motorola Razr.
Also: The best flip phones of 2024: Expert tested and reviewed
The latest version of Motorola's flip phone gets all sorts of upgrades from last year's model: a bigger external display, faster performance, better water resistance, and higher brightness, all for the same $699 price. Are there some downsides? Sure, but anyone looking for a mid-range foldable should look no further.
View at AmazonIt starts with the cover screen, which has significantly improved over the previous generation. The display has grown from 1.5 inches to 3.6 inches -- the same size as the outer screen on the 2023 Razr Plus. This means that you can run apps, play games, and use well-detailed widgets for quick glances at important information.
Also: I replaced my Pixel 9 Pro with Google's $1,800 foldable for a week - and can't go back
For context, none of these features were available on the old Razr. Sure, you had some widgets and panels to look at on its tiny 1.5-inch display, but there's no denying that it got cramped pretty quickly. The new Razr gracefully avoids that issue with a far larger screen, and it's the upgrade I've appreciated the most.
Speaking of which, the main display also looks great. It shares many of the same specs as the old Razr's display, such as the size, the P-OLED panel, and the Full HD+ resolution. The refresh rate is slightly lower at 120Hz versus 144Hz, but the difference is negligible. What matters most is the increased brightness; the new Razr can go all the way up to 3,000 nits, making the screen way easier to see in direct sunlight, especially through sunglasses.
Of course, the crease is still there, but Motorola has reduced it compared to the previous Razr. It doesn't feel as pronounced in person, but you can definitely still see it. The hinge itself has also been upgraded with increased strength, which is important for long-term use.
Also: The best Android phones you can buy: Expert tested
Motorola also had the Razr and Razr Plus IPX8 certified, which means you can dunk either of them in a meter and a half of water for up to 30 minutes. You might be wondering why there's an "X" where you'd usually find a "5" or "6" in that rating, and that's because Moto didn't test for dirt and dust protection. The company did, however, tell me that there is a level of protection for small debris, so there's that.
The design also includes some premium materials on the exterior. The Koala Gray version I have comes with a vegan suede material, while the Beach Sand and Spritz Orange (a.k.a. the best color) have vegan leather. The suede on the gray model feels both smooth and grippy, and I haven't noticed any excess dirt collection. Of course, over time, it's unclear how well the material will hold up, but it seems to be doing well in my early testing.
Also: I tested Motorola's new Razr Plus (2024) and it made the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip feel outdated
New in Motorola's Hello UX experience are a few AI upgrades, including a whole new Moto Assistant that can reference images, remember what someone said, and manage your notifications. Unfortunately, it's not here yet. Instead, the only "new" AI feature I could test was Google Gemini, which is integrated into both the folding and cover displays. You can completely replace the Google Assistant with Gemini and use the same "Hey Google" command to ask questions or prompts.
I also really liked the battery life of the Razr. Motorola equipped it with a 4,200mAh cell, and it can deliver all-day battery life with 20-25 percent left in the tank after a full 16-hour day. It recharges at 30W which, admittedly, is slow by today's standards, but it's fine for an overnight juice-up. You also get 15W wireless charging, which is a nice convenience, but there's no reverse wireless charging.
The biggest downside to the new Razr, however, is the camera. The 50MP f/1.7 main camera is severely underwhelming. Photos come out decent in broad daylight, but they fall apart quickly in most other situations.
A sample from the 50MP main camera on the Motorola Razr (2024)
The 13MP ultra-wide camera is simply unreliable as is. Quality dips tremendously between the two sensors, with the ultra-wide failing to capture the same amount of light and detail as the main. Video quality from both looks choppy and overprocessed, and the portrait mode is passable. I do appreciate the fact you can use the outer screen as a viewfinder for your subject, but with cameras this disappointing, it's nothing more than a nice-to-have the few times you'll be snapping shots.
Also: Motorola's $399 Razr is the cheapest foldable phone deal right now
Video quality is also disappointing, as are selfies taken with the 32MP front-facing camera. Overall, unless you tend to apply a ton of filters to your photos anyway, you'll be disappointed.
I'm also not a fan of the software support Motorola has promised. It only guarantees three years of major Android upgrades and four years of security patches, whereas other manufacturers offer five to seven years of updates. Maybe you have used your phone for longer than three years, or maybe you haven't, but it'd be nice if Motorola gave you the option to use the phone longer than three years with updates.
One more side note: the Razr tends to get pretty hot under normal usage. Maybe it's just the extra heat from the summer or the fact that I was taking more pictures than I usually would outside of a review period, but I noticed that it heats up pretty often and doesn't cool down as quickly as other phones. My guess? It's a physics thing involving the specs, battery, and the fact that this thing is on the thin side.
ZDNET's buying advice
The Motorola Razr (2024) is a great entry-level phone for those who are curious about the flip-style form factor. While the camera isn't the best, the rest of the Razr is incredibly solid, especially for the $699 asking price. Sure, you'll find more high-end foldables out there, but if you want to save some money (or perhaps pick it up as a secondary phone), this is the one to get.
How we test phones
ZDNET's review team spends upwards of a year testing the ins and outs of every major phone release, evaluating the day-to-day performance, camera quality, battery life and endurance, and special features. Here's a breakdown of every factor we consider before we make recommendations:
- Design and ergonomics: How good a phone looks and feels plays a big role in many users' buying journeys, so we consider these aspects heavily when testing.
- Performance: Several factors affect a phone's performance, including LTE/5G signal, battery life, and background tasks. Therefore, we typically begin our evaluations with a fully charged handset, with all background tasks closed, and with as stable of a mobile connection as possible.
- Camera quality: ZDNET tests phone cameras by capturing hundreds of photos and videos of various subjects and in various lighting conditions. We also compare the output to that of older models.
- Battery life and charging: It's also important for us to evaluate how long phones last under light, moderate, and heavy usage, how long they take to recharge, and how they do it (wired, wireless, or both).
- Special features: These features distinguish tested devices from a bustling smartphone market and hopefully bring added value to users, not the opposite.
- Pricing and availability: Beyond budget considerations, we also note if a phone is available in the US or only internationally.
For a more extensive breakdown, check out our comprehensive phone testing methodology page.
This article was originally published on July 8, 2024, and was updated on September 17, 2024.