John the OFM | 12 Jun 2012 10:12 a.m. PST |
I would. Buying Pershings that first saw action in April 1945 seems to me a waste. Now, I KNOW that I can do it myself, but a RSWS supplement would result in more cool models being produced, so I am for it. |
firstvarty1979 | 12 Jun 2012 10:44 a.m. PST |
Why not Korea? Not hypothetical that way, and all they would need to do is some North Korean and Chinese infantry since the vast majority of the equipment would be Late WWII Soviet and American vintage. |
Historicalgamer | 12 Jun 2012 10:46 a.m. PST |
|
kallman | 12 Jun 2012 10:56 a.m. PST |
Yes I been wanting to do Operation Unthinkable for some time now. |
indierockclimber | 12 Jun 2012 11:19 a.m. PST |
Why not? I played the heck out of Patton in Flames. |
Garand | 12 Jun 2012 11:24 a.m. PST |
No. But a Korea expansion wouldn't be out of order. You could even include more "advanced" tanks for "what if" scenarios too (like if the Chinese decided to use JS-2s in-theater)
Damon. |
richarDISNEY | 12 Jun 2012 11:33 a.m. PST |
Nope.
|
Only Warlock | 12 Jun 2012 11:54 a.m. PST |
Hell, i want a T-28 in 15mm, so I will buy anything! link
|
elsyrsyn | 12 Jun 2012 11:56 a.m. PST |
Now THAT's a mantlet! Doug |
Rrobbyrobot | 12 Jun 2012 12:10 p.m. PST |
I'm not a fan of FoW. But gaming what if games set in this period could be fun. As OFM said, a good excuse for some cool new stuff. |
Mako11 | 12 Jun 2012 12:27 p.m. PST |
"Now THAT's a mantlet"! AND a Tank!!! I'm not into the FoW rules, so no. I would buy some T-28's though. |
Chef Lackey Rich | 12 Jun 2012 12:44 p.m. PST |
Would I buy the rules? No. Woud I buy minis that they'd need to make for the rules, including early post-war stuff and Korean era designs? Hell, yes. I don't see why they couldn't do both RSWS and Korea. |
McKinstry | 12 Jun 2012 12:51 p.m. PST |
Yes. Tied to a Korea supplement would be best. |
cbaxter | 12 Jun 2012 1:55 p.m. PST |
i am all for modern FoW expansions one day. But I agree why not do Korea instead. |
jameshammyhamilton | 12 Jun 2012 3:24 p.m. PST |
|
Wyatt the Odd | 12 Jun 2012 5:43 p.m. PST |
It would be a small rule book. They already wrote the entire campaign when they released the "Pacific War Rules". You just need a 1/144 B-29
"30 Seconds Over Moscow" Seriously, though. Why would they need a rule book when you've already got the ability to game it out as is. What you're really asking for is the release of "Late War Monsters" minis. Wyatt |
PSADennis | 12 Jun 2012 6:01 p.m. PST |
|
Jakar Nilson | 12 Jun 2012 7:24 p.m. PST |
Yes. Anyone else sick of having nothing but Shermans? |
VonBurge | 12 Jun 2012 7:49 p.m. PST |
I'm sworn to buy anything BF prints for FoW. It will be a great read with some lovely pictures I'm sure. I don't game with 75% of the rules stuff I buy anyway
so sure!!! |
Jovian1 | 12 Jun 2012 7:53 p.m. PST |
I'd prefer to see a "late war monsters" book – showing off the T-28, as well as other strangeness from the late war and hypothetical vehicles which were in development. Korea would be a cool new venue as well. Heck, they did the Vietnam supplement, so why not a Korea supplement. |
Wyatt the Odd | 12 Jun 2012 9:55 p.m. PST |
Jovian - While it would make perfect sense for them to have gone with Korea, I think the Vietnam scenario allowed them to test the market and only required something like 10-12 sets of vehicles and figures to complete a game. Wyatt |
Guthroth | 13 Jun 2012 4:43 a.m. PST |
Korea ? yes, Yes YEs YES !!! Not so keen on RSWS though. |
Patrick Sexton | 13 Jun 2012 6:13 a.m. PST |
|
Waco Joe | 13 Jun 2012 7:24 a.m. PST |
Probably, depends on how much new equipment they can throw in. |
Lion in the Stars | 13 Jun 2012 12:11 p.m. PST |
What you're really asking for is the release of "Late War Monsters" minis. "Late-War Leviathans" if you want to keep the alliteration. And yes, I would totally buy either a Korea or RSWS book. Or both. |
lcannard | 14 Jun 2012 3:53 a.m. PST |
I would possibly, depending on how much German stuff is in it. |
X7 Knight | 15 Jun 2012 9:14 a.m. PST |
Yes. and even more quickly if it was for Korea. You bet! |