Abstract
While educational technologies provide increasing opportunities for interactive exploration in a learning environment, crucial questions remain: Will learners be able to exercise control and effectively regulate their own learning in flexible learning systems? Will they be motivated enough really to explore? Theory and research suggest that learners can and will, if the instructional systems are well-designed and if the learners are adequately prepared. In this paper, the components of learner control, self-regulated learning, and continuing motivation are examined as possible requirements and benefits of effective interactive instruction. A theoretical framework is advanced which illustrates the interdependence and mutual importance of these three components. Educational research in each of these three areas is analyzed, inconsistencies are discussed, and further support is developed for consideration of these components within an instructional situation. Finally, recommendations are offered for future research, to develop further what we know about what makes instruction effective and learners successful.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Ames, C. (1987). The enhancement of student motivation. In M. L. Maehr and D. A. Kleiber (Eds.),Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 5. Enhancing motivation. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Arlin, M., & Whitley, T. W. (1978). Perceptions of self-managed learning opportunities and academic locus of control: A causal interpretation.Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 988–992.
Armstrong, A. M. (1989). The development of self-regulation skills through the modeling and structuring of computer programming.Educational Technology Research & Development, 37(2), 69–76.
Atkinson, R. C. (1972). Optimizing the learning of a second-language vocabulary.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 96, 124–129.
Baird, J. R., & White, R. T. (1982). Promoting self-control of learning.Instructional Science, 11, 227–247.
Bandura, A. (1982). The self and mechanisms of agency. In J. Suls (Ed.),Psychological perspectives on the self. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bobrow, S. A., & Bower, G. H. (1969). Comprehension and recall of sentences.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 455–461.
Brophy, J. (1983). Conceptualizing student motivation.Educational Psychologist, 18, 200–215.
Bruner, J. S. (1966).Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Campanizzi, J. (1978). The effects of locus-of-control and provision of overviews upon response latency and achievement in a computer-assisted instructional sequence.Dissertation Abstracts International, 39(2-A) 830A. (University Microfilms No. 78-12, 325)
Campbell, V. N. (1964). Self-direction and programmed instruction for five different types of learning objectives.Psychology in the Schools, 1, 348–359.
Campbell, V. N., & Chapman, M. A. (1967). Learner control vs. program control of instruction.Psychology in the Schools, 4, 121–130.
Carrier, C. A. (1984). Do learners make good choices?Instructional Innovator, 29(2), 15–17, 48.
Carrier, C. A., & Williams, M. D. (1988). A test of one learner-control strategy with students of differing levels of task persistence.American Educational Research Journal, 25, 285–306.
Carrier, C. A., Davidson, G. V., Williams, M. D., & Kalweit, C. M. (1986). Instructional options and encouragement effects in a microcomputer-delivered concept lesson.Journal of Educational Research, 79, 222–229.
Clark, R. (1984). Research on student thought processes during computer-based instruction.Journal of Instructional Development, 7(3), 2–5.
Condry, J., & Chambers, J. (1978). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning. In M. R. Lepper and D. Greene (Eds.),The hidden costs of reward: New perspectives on the psychology of human motivation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation.Educational Psychologist, 18, 88–108.
Crandall, V. J., Katkovsky, W., & Preston, A. (1962). Motivational and ability determinants of young children's intellectual achievement behaviors.Child Development, 33, 643–661.
deCharms, R. (1968).Personal causation. New York: Academic Press.
Deci, E. L. (1975).Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum.
Fiderio, J. (1988). A grand vision.BYTE, 13(10), 237–244.
Findley, M. J., & Cooper, H. M. (1983). Locus of control and academic achievement: A literature review.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 419–427.
Fisher, M. D., Blackwell, L. R., Garcia, A. B., & Greene, J. C. (1975). Effects of student control and choice on engagement in aCai arithmetic task in a low-income school.Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 776–783.
Gay, G. (1986). Interaction of learner control and prior understanding in computer-assisted video instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 225–227.
Gray, S. H. (1987). The effect of sequence control on computer assisted learning.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 14, 54–56.
Greiner, J. M., & Karoly, P. (1976). Effects of self-control training on study activity and academic performance: An analysis of self-monitoring, self-reward, and systematic-planning components.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 23, 495–502.
Hansen, J. B. (1974). Effects of feedback, learner control, and cognitive abilities on state anxiety and performance in a computer-assisted instruction task.Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 247–254.
Harter, S., & Connell, J. P. (1984). A model of children's achievement and related self-perceptions of competence, control, and motivational orientation. In J. Nicholls and M. Maehr (Eds.),Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 3. The development of achievement motivation. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Herndon, J. N. (1987). Learner interests, achievement, and continuing motivation in instruction.Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 11–14.
Hurlock, R. E., Lahey, G. F., & McCann, P. H. (1974, April).Student controlled versus program controlled Cai. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 089 681).
Jacobsen, E., & Thompson, M. (1975, April).Self-managed learning using Cai. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 104 362).
Kehoe, J. F. (1979). Choice time and aspects of choice alternatives. In L. C. Perlmuter and R. A. Monty (Eds.),Choice and perceived control (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design and instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 383–434). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kinzie, M. B., & Sullivan, H. J. (1989b). ContinuingMotivational and achievement effects of learner control of computer-assisted instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Kinzie, M. B., & Sullivan, H. J. (1989b) Continuing motivation, learner control, and CAI.Educational Technology Research & Development, 37(2), 5–14.
Kinzie, M. B., Sullivan, H. J., & Berdel, R. L. (1988). Learner control and achievement in science computer-assisted instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 299–303.
Langer, E. J., & Rodin, J. (1976). The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: A field experiment in an institutional setting.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 191–198.
Lepper, M. R. (1985). Microcomputers in education: Motivational and social issues.American Psychologist, 40(1), 1–18.
Lepper, M. R., & Chabay, R. W. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and instruction: Conflicting views on the role of the motivational processes in computer-based education.Educational Psychologist, 20, 217–231.
Maehr, M. L. (1976). Continuing motivation: An analysis of a seldom considered educational outcome.Review of Educational Research, 46, 443–462.
Mager, R. F. (1964). Learner-controlled instruction—1958–1964.Programmed Instruction, 4(2), 1, 8, 10–12.
Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction.Cognitive Science, 4, 333–369.
McCombs, B. L. (1982–3). Learner satisfaction, motivation, and performance: Capitalizing on strategies for positive self-control.Performance and Instruction, 21(4), 3–6.
McCombs, B. L. (1984). Processes and skills underlying continuing intrinsic motivation to learn: Toward a definition of motivational skills training interventions.Educational Psychologist, 19, 199–218.
Merrill, M. D. (1975). Learner control: Beyond aptitude-treatment interactions.AV Communications Review, 23, 217–226.
Merrill, M. D. (1980). Learner control in computer based learning.Computers & Education, 4, 77–95.
Milheim, W. D., & Azbell, J. W. (1988, January).How past research on learner control can aid in the design of interactive video materials. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, New Orleans.
Newman, S. E. (1957). Student vs. instructor design of study method.Journal of Educational Psychology, 48, 328–333.
Pascal, C. E. (1971). Instructional options, option preference, and course outcomes.The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 17(1), 1–11.
Perlmuter, L. C., & Monty, R. A. (1977). The importance of perceived control: Fact or fantasy?American Scientist, 65, 759–765.
Piaget, J. (1952).The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.
Resnick, L. B. (1972). Open education: Some tasks for technology.Educational Technology, 12(1), 70–76.
Rodin, J., & Langer, E. (1977). Long-term effects of a control-relevant intervention with the institutionalized aged.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 897–902.
Rodin, J., Solomon, S. K., & Metcalf, J. (1978). Role of control in mediating perceptions of density.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 988–999.
Ross, S. M., & Rakow, E. A. (1980). Adaptive design strategies for the teacher-managed course.Journal of Instructional Psychology, 7(1), 13–19.
Ross, S. M., McCormick, D., & Krisak, N. (1986). Adapting the thematic context of mathematical problems to student interests: Individual versus group-based strategies.Journal of Educational Research, 79, 245–252.
Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G. R. (1989). In search of a happy medium in instructional technology research: Issues concerning external validity, media replications, and learner control.Educational Technology Research & Development, 37, 19–33.
Ross, S. M., Morrison, G. R., & O'Dell, J. K. (1988). Obtaining more out of less text inCbi: Effects of varied text density levels as a function of learner characteristics and control strategy.Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 36, 131–142.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.Psychological Monographs, 80 (Whole No. 69), 1–28.
Salomon, G., & Garner, H. (1986). The computer as educator: Lessons from television research.Educational Researcher, 15(1), 13–19.
Schulz, R. (1976). Effects of control and predictability on the physical and psychological well-being of the institutionalized aged.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 563–573.
Schulz, R., & Hanusa, B. H. (1978). Long-term effects of control and predictability-enhancing interventions: Findings and ethical issues.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1,194–1,201.
Schunk, D. H., & Rice, J. M. (1987). Enhancing comprehension skill and self-efficacy with strategy value information.Journal of Reading Behavior, 19, 285–302.
Sherrod, D. R., Hage, J. N., Halpern, P. L., & Moore, B. S. (1977). Effects of personal causation and perceived control on responses to an aversive environment: The more control, the better.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 14–27.
Snow, R. E. (1980). Aptitude, learner control, and adaptive instruction.Educational Psychologist, 15, 151–158.
Steinberg, E. R., Baskin, A. B., & Hofer, E. (1986). Organizational/memory tools: A technique for improving problem solving skills.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2, 169–187.
Stipek, D. J., & Weisz, J. R. (1981). Perceived control and academic achievement.Review of Educational Research, 51, 101–137.
Stotland, E., & Blumenthal, A. L. (1964). The reduction of anxiety as a result of the expectation of making a choice.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 18, 139–145.
Tennyson, R. D. (1980). Instructional control strategies and content structure as design variables in concept acquisition using computer-based instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 525–532.
Tennyson, R. D. (1981). Use of adaptive information for advisement in learning concepts and rules using computer-assisted instruction.American Educational Research Journal, 18, 425–428.
Tennyson, R. D., & Buttrey, T. (1980). Advisement and management strategies as design variables in computer-assisted instruction.Educational Communication & Technology Journal, 28, 169–176.
Tennyson, R. D., & Rothen, W. (1979). Management of computer-based instruction: Design of an adaptive control strategy.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 5, 63–71.
Wang, M. C. (1983). Development and consequences of students' sense of personal control. In J. M. Levine and M. C. Wang (Eds.),Teacher and student perceptions: Implications for learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wang, M. C., & Stiles, B. (1976). An investigation of children's concept of self-responsibility for their school learning.American Educational Research Journal, 13, 159–179.
White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence.Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author wishes to thank Richard Berdel, Craig Locatis, and theETR&D reviewers for their comments on a draft of this article.
Editor's Note: This article is the award-winning manuscript for the 1990ETR&D Young Scholar Award, sponsored by the ECT Foundation. Dr. Kinzie was selected as the winner based on reviews and ratings by theETR&D Research Board from the manuscripts submitted for the award competition.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kinzie, M.B. Requirements and benefits of effective interactive instruction: Learner control, self-regulation, and continuing motivation. ETR&D 38, 5–21 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298244
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298244