[Suggestion] Naming schema for different binding types

[SaschaWillems]

With @asuessenbach working hard on unifying the framework I was wondering if we could agree on some naming schema for the different binding types.

Using types aliases already makes things a lot easier to read like this:

// Usings
using BufferAllocationC   = BufferAllocation<vkb::BindingType::C>;
using BufferAllocationCpp = BufferAllocation<vkb::BindingType::Cpp>;

// Usage
vkb::BufferAllocationC do_something();
vkb::BufferAllocationCpp do_something();

Maybe we can improve upon this a little bit by having the C-Binding be the default, and the only suffixing the C++ one?

Like this:

// Usings
using BufferAllocation   = BufferAllocation<vkb::BindingType::C>;
using BufferAllocationCpp = BufferAllocation<vkb::BindingType::Cpp>;

// Usage
vkb::BufferAllocation do_something();
vkb::BufferAllocationCpp do_something();

Just some food for thought and maybe something we can discuss on the next call.

[tomadamatkinson]

Agreed, this would make it more readable

[asuessenbach]

No problem, if the consensus is to use that naming scheme, I can adjust #1085 accordingly.