There were so many wonderful things going on at WIFYR. Ann
Cannon’s workshop certainly ranked high for those of us in attendance.
The morning workshops are the heart of WIFYR. Carol Williams
pulls in ten superb faculty members who run morning sessions. Each manages
their groups differently, but the major focus is critique of participants’
work. Not only does this help improve your own story, learning to critique
makes you a better writer.
Our group was particularly amazing. Time together, four
hours a day, five mornings a week, creates a special bond. Ann guided our crew
by encouraging honest yet positive critique. Each of us shared twenty pages and
was afforded an hour or more of attention solely to our own stories. We first
had to mention authors or books that inspired us, or whose style we want to
imitate. Ann let workshop members share their thoughts first, and then finished
with comments of her own. The opinions and open discussion of several writers
gives the author a variety of options for improving their story.
I liked the routine Ann established for us. We began the day
with a free write. She would put a noun, such as bicycle or dog and we wrote
about it. Next came a recap of the day prior. We shared thoughts that struck us
from the afternoon sessions of Martine Leavitt, J Scott Savage, or the agents
and others.
Before we moved onto critiques, Ann shared some of her craft
secrets. The WIFYR word was to torture your characters and Ann agreed. She
suggested brainstorming obstacles for them to overcome and told us to make the
situation helpless for them. Keep the characters grounded in the space/time
continuum so that the reader knows when and where the action occurs. I like what
she does once she’s finished the first draft. Ann prints the whole thing out,
puts it in a 3-ring binder, and celebrates that she has a book. You may choose
to put it away for a few weeks so that you return to it with fresh eyes. When
she’s ready to revise, she rereads the whole thing, several times, armed with
sticky notes. She reads it looking to insure her characters are grounded, that
it makes sense. She notes on a different colored sticky when she reads for
plot, and then again for character, and language clarity. Then she takes the
stickies and writes herself an editorial letter, the same kind an agent would
send pointing out the flaws in the manuscript. She prints it and puts it in the
front of the 3-ring binder and checks the things off as she addresses them.
Perhaps the most trivial, yet notable thing she suggested
was a daily affirmation of ourselves as writers. This evoked memories of Stuart
Smalley’s “I’m good enough; I’m smart enough; and doggone it, people like me”
from Saturday Night Live. But the idea is good. The mantra for the week she
gave us: “We’re writing a book that someone will want to read.”
Thanks, Ann. We learned a lot.