It's awfully difficult to maintain a blog. I applaud those who do, because I find that there just aren't enough hours in the day to find the time it takes to express, at length, my many thoughts on whatever horrible thing the right wing is doing or saying. What's more, where should I start? From hour to hour, moment to moment, nanosecond to nanosecond, there is a plethora of horrible things right wing nutjobs are doing and saying, which makes it nearly impossible to nail just one awful thing down. Frankly, there are way too many options.
With all this in mind, I've decided that the best approach to showing just how ugly, hateful, vile, petty and wrong the right wing is, is to rely on its very own words. That is, from now on, this blog will be dedicated to capturing the sentiments expressed by right wing blog visitors, precisely as they were written, and reposting them here.
It should really blow your fucking socks off.
Why this? And why now? Well, because I spend a lot of time reading these right wing sites (Know thine enemy, my friends), and it's pretty amazing to read the sorts of comments these people leave behind when they think they're safely amongst their own. If I ever briefly considered the notion that conservatism could not essentially be summed as a set of priniciples I find wholly despicable (e.g., being so selfish that you'd keep even the sickest, poorest children from receiving free health care if it meant a single dollar might be taken from your own pocket; believing that you and all real Americans are under seige by Mexicans, blacks, feminists, gays and abortionists; solidly holding onto the idea that war is a far superior choice to, say, looking like a sissy; being convinced that the life of anyone living anywhere else in the world is far less important than an American life; wishing that we could travel back to a time when white men weren't taken for such granted), those days are long gone. Reading right wing blogs has etched in my brain the fact that, yes, they really are that bad. And worse.
So, let's get right to it, shall we? Today's selection is from Michelle Malkin (http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/18/newsflash-obama-says-god-bless-america-plus-the-philly-speech/#comments), from what might be called an "article" (if it had any jounalistic merit) on Obama's "A More Perfect Union" speech. I won't editorialize here. The comments speak for themselves:
On March 18th, 2008 at 10:15 am, tgusa said:
This is ridiculous. Do Americans even have enough sense to recognize and admit that some people hate them and always will? They want racial change so bad they desire to be liked so much they are willing to pretend that this was no big deal. This cult leaders words are embraced by I would say 80 percent of blacks according to different radio callers that were black yesterday. The cult leader has preached that if God don’t hate whites too they don’t need him. The media including fox news and some talk radio are clueless fools who have no problem playing it down trying to pull more wool over our eyes. Whites are murdered by blacks lay the responsibility at the feet that is where it belongs. Congratulations white media rats not only do they hate you but so do I you are lucky you have each other at least temporarily.
Wake up white Americans these people have no desire to improve race relations all of the lies we have been told are finally coming home to roost. Don’t let them fool you these people are despicable they are all guilty of crimes against whites before and after the fact. One thing is for sure, I believed the rhetoric too but BHO’s campaign of change has changed my mind. I refuse to be a sacrificial lamb on the alter of pcbs racism I care about my family my friends my countrymen and no white hating devil will ever change that. Cult leader wright wants a piece of us don’t talk about it as usual come and get it we were waiting the last time (LA riots) but although they threatened us they never followed through with I, what a surprise. Frankly this cult leader sounds a lot like a radical imam at the least they have a lot in common, another big surprise.
On March 18th, 2008 at 10:23 am, geminicontender said:
I have to agree with tgusa. There is more hate out there then we realize and the hate is coming from the blacks. It comes down to welfare primarily. They have done nothing to help themselves. They expect handouts. Black fathers disappear because the government takes care of their offspring. Katrina started this I believe. All the crap regarding the 9th ward and lack of instant help……of course Nagin and Blanco are truly responsible for that.
On March 18th, 2008 at 10:48 am, txvet2 said:
The more I see of this “church”, and the more I read the views of its leader, the more it resembles a black Muslim congregation, and the less it resembles any sort of Christianity. Obama says Wright “led him to embrace Christianity”. But I thought he claims to have been raised a Christian, with his time spent in the Muslim schools just a happenstance of his family’s moving around. A basic tenet of Islam is that you don’t leave the religion, under any circumstances. I don’t believe Obama has. And he still doesn’t honor the flag or swear allegiance to this country, unless he just started that in the last few days, also.
On March 18th, 2008 at 10:56 am, gayle said:
He has just RUINED himself completely.
Slaves? COME ON!
On March 18th, 2008 at 11:08 am, greysheepdog said:
If he becomes President will he finally do away with welfare?
On March 18th, 2008 at 11:11 am, gayle said:
I am dizzy from his rambling.
We don’t need a speech about his trials and tribulations.
Don’t want to hear about blacks either.
On March 18th, 2008 at 11:30 am, tgusa said:
No we don’t want America becoming like Mexico or Zimbabwe…Tell me, where are the harmonious colored countries that are welcoming whites? Oh that’s right they are stealing white farmers land (the primary suppliers) and then whining about the fact that they have no food. If you continue to do stupid things blame yourself not whites or any other colors. And one thing on the illegal issue, last Sunday the day of rest when my whole neighborhood is quiet and relaxed I was awaked by an extremely loud chainsaw. That’s right, I know if you are working on Sunday speaking Spanish you are a tax evading work stealing person who cares nothing about us. I for one am tried of having them give us the finger and I will report any neighbor that assists in the invasion. That’s what it is an invasion from south of the border, no shots fired, a cold invasion, not unlike the cold war. You want to play head in the sand keep it to yourself or perhaps move, to one of those countries you can’t list.
On March 18th, 2008 at 11:39 am, jim c said:
So much for hope and change. The only thing I heard from BHO was class warfare and racial demagoguery.
Jim C
On March 18th, 2008 at 11:52 am, almeehan said:
I’m a white male “Irish-American” if we must use these terms, and I have health insurance and still have to wait in line in hospital ERs. Means they are crowded, often by illegals who because of liberals like Obama past laws that make me pay for their indiscretions of invading our imperfect union.Why didn’t he say God Bless America this time–too many folks listening in? It’s not what he said that scares me, it what he hasn’t said in this speech and there is plenty of that. I’m not sure I got his point about Ashley.
On March 18th, 2008 at 11:55 am, almeehan said:
Just prior to the speech CNN had their black news commentator who seemed orgasmic about this will allow Obama to carry on with his messianic campaign. He had a black professor & another black lady commentators who were very liberal. Unfair and unbalance=CNN all the way.
On March 18th, 2008 at 12:08 pm, mytake said:
Where is O.J. when we need him? If he gets away with this speech another black got away with murder. Another thing, doesn’t this rant remind everyone that he is a socialist? Where does it leave the individual in his line of thinking?
On March 18th, 2008 at 12:11 pm, geminicontender said:
Maybe Obama was trying to tell us that his Grandmother feared him everytime he walked by. He can blame his white grandmother for all his and all blacks ills.
Showing posts with label michelle malkin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label michelle malkin. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Thursday, September 20, 2007
Michelle Malkin Gets F'ed Up, Yells at Sally Field on TV
Reading crackhead Michelle Malkin’s column yesterday (http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/19/silly-sally-field-doesnt-speak-for-me) was like having a one-on-one conversation with Crazy. Malkin must've gotten her hands on some really good rock (we don’t indulge, so we wouldn’t be able to gauge the quality of crack ourselves, but we’re guessing), smoked that “shiznit” (we hear that’s what she calls it), gotten high as hell, watched the Emmys, and decided the people inside the TV were speaking directly to her. The drugged up aspiring journalist went batshit after watching Sally Field’s acceptance speech, in which she said:
“Surely this [award] belongs to all the mothers of the world. Especially…the mothers who stand with an open heart and wait. Wait for their children to come home from danger, from harm’s way and from war. I am proud to be one of those women. If mothers ruled the…world, there would be no goddamned wars in the first place."
As drug-free readers, we understand that Field was recognizing the mothers of U.S. troops and the devastating sacrifice they potentially face; that she is a mother who is fiercely protective of her children – as mothers are wont to be – and empathizes with those mothers who cannot protect their children from war; and that most mothers in Iraq and America and elsewhere place a premium on life that supersedes war profiteering, oil reserves and political power struggles.
Malkin, however, hopped up on crack and angel dust – and probably drooling – must’ve heard Field talking in Judas Priest lyrics spoken backwards. In a drug induced haze (again, we’re guessing) she writes:
"Sally Field is the mom who looks the other way when the brat on the elementary school slide pushes your son to the ground or throws dirt in your daughter’s face."
We’re unsure how Field’s words, which clearly indicate her motherly instinct to shield her children from every attack, could give rise to this kind of misinterpretation. The only thing we are sure of after reading this is that Malkin will beat up little children if they get out of line or play rough. Or simply if given the chance. Or, you know…if no one is looking.
Malkin then kicks the bonkers up a notch:
"She's the mom who holds her tongue at the mall when thugs spew profanities and make crude gestures in front of her brood."
Um…where does Malkin shop? At malls near crackhouses, apparently, for convenience. Where bands of foulmouthed ne’er-do-wells rove from Lane Bryant to Cinnabon to Rave, looking for passerby toward whom they can thrust their groins, wag their tongues and spit dirty words. And yet, oddly, she always chooses to bring her kids along.
Malkin’s nonsensical ramblings include references to “sheep mothers” and “lion mothers” and she accuses Field of thinking “with [her] womb.” She ends by suggesting Field “speak for [her] bleepin’ self.” The message is clear: Malkin is perfectly willing to send her children off to battle, even in a war that lacks clear justification. What passes for good mothering – and morality – in Malkin’s world is unquestioning compliance with the policies of her country, not the overriding desire to keep every mother’s children safe. In the meantime, we imagine her raising hawkish children who are learning to react violently to perceived indignities on the playground and have their moral systems informed, above all, by their government’s decisions.
It’s sad, really, but we believe – we hope – it’s the drugs (all of them, from the crack to the PCP to the Spanish fly to the Burmese street slug embryonic fluid and back again) talking. And we sincerely want Malkin to get help before she writes again.
Or punches some little kid in the face.
“Surely this [award] belongs to all the mothers of the world. Especially…the mothers who stand with an open heart and wait. Wait for their children to come home from danger, from harm’s way and from war. I am proud to be one of those women. If mothers ruled the…world, there would be no goddamned wars in the first place."
As drug-free readers, we understand that Field was recognizing the mothers of U.S. troops and the devastating sacrifice they potentially face; that she is a mother who is fiercely protective of her children – as mothers are wont to be – and empathizes with those mothers who cannot protect their children from war; and that most mothers in Iraq and America and elsewhere place a premium on life that supersedes war profiteering, oil reserves and political power struggles.
Malkin, however, hopped up on crack and angel dust – and probably drooling – must’ve heard Field talking in Judas Priest lyrics spoken backwards. In a drug induced haze (again, we’re guessing) she writes:
"Sally Field is the mom who looks the other way when the brat on the elementary school slide pushes your son to the ground or throws dirt in your daughter’s face."
We’re unsure how Field’s words, which clearly indicate her motherly instinct to shield her children from every attack, could give rise to this kind of misinterpretation. The only thing we are sure of after reading this is that Malkin will beat up little children if they get out of line or play rough. Or simply if given the chance. Or, you know…if no one is looking.
Malkin then kicks the bonkers up a notch:
"She's the mom who holds her tongue at the mall when thugs spew profanities and make crude gestures in front of her brood."
Um…where does Malkin shop? At malls near crackhouses, apparently, for convenience. Where bands of foulmouthed ne’er-do-wells rove from Lane Bryant to Cinnabon to Rave, looking for passerby toward whom they can thrust their groins, wag their tongues and spit dirty words. And yet, oddly, she always chooses to bring her kids along.
Malkin’s nonsensical ramblings include references to “sheep mothers” and “lion mothers” and she accuses Field of thinking “with [her] womb.” She ends by suggesting Field “speak for [her] bleepin’ self.” The message is clear: Malkin is perfectly willing to send her children off to battle, even in a war that lacks clear justification. What passes for good mothering – and morality – in Malkin’s world is unquestioning compliance with the policies of her country, not the overriding desire to keep every mother’s children safe. In the meantime, we imagine her raising hawkish children who are learning to react violently to perceived indignities on the playground and have their moral systems informed, above all, by their government’s decisions.
It’s sad, really, but we believe – we hope – it’s the drugs (all of them, from the crack to the PCP to the Spanish fly to the Burmese street slug embryonic fluid and back again) talking. And we sincerely want Malkin to get help before she writes again.
Or punches some little kid in the face.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)