Lim Guan Eng’s statement belies a deep partisan bias on matters that concern national history, identity and sentiment - KJ
Statement by the Leader of UMNO Youth in response to Lim Guan Eng
As press statements go, Lim Guan Eng’s speedy response to my comments regarding the film “The New Village” speaks volumes to his inherently political and partisan character. For context, I questioned why “The New Village” appears to be given an easier ride by the Film Censorship Board compared to “Tanda Putera” whose screening had been delayed by a year until the new release date of Aug 29. Considering the pain and tragedy attached to the points of history at which both films are situated, it was a question I raised to ensure that the sensitivities of all Malaysians were taken into account, what with the screening of the two films meant to happen in the month of our Independence.
Instead of engaging in the question of what was appropriate and accurate to be screened as history, Lim Guan Eng’s statement belies a deep partisan bias on matters that concern national history, identity and sentiment. This bias comes at great cost to the force of his arguments – he employs a most rudimentary logic to arrive at an indefensible conclusion that Utusan and UMNO Youth are hypocrites. I wish to expose this bias.
Lim Guan Eng’s charge of hypocrisy centers on this most curious of arguments: that if Barisan Nasional makes ties with governments or other political parties with a communist past, then it has no right to complain about films that may glorify our own communist history. He quotes our ties with the likes of China and Cuba as examples – and for effect, he brings up the relationship that BN Youth made with the Communist Youth League of China (CYL).
It doesn’t take very much to know that the situations are incomparable. Our relationships with China, Cuba and Vietnam are diplomatic ties with internationally recognized sovereign governments – relationships borne out of trade, economic and geo-political necessitThat they happen to be ‘communist’ – in the case of China clearly more in name than in nature – does not carry the same significance as the communism Malaysians remember; a communism which this film appears to be glorifying.
But let’s indulge Lim Guan Eng in his lazy analogies for a moment longer. The Communist Party of China has undergone a profound evolution in its character as the world moved away from Cold War sensibilities to 21st century globalisation – in the most important ways, it is unrecognizable from its Marxist-Leninist past to the present day incarnation responsible for turning China into a global superpower. In stark contrast, the Communist Party of Malaya (CPM) never went through anything of the sort as far as the Malaysian collective consciousness is concerned. It was not the party of government, it was not responsible for steering this country’s economic progress. Instead, it remains synonymous with a very dark period in our history, conjuring up painful memories for all Malaysians affected by their reign of terror.
But of course these basic comprehensions are lost on Lim Guan Eng. He would sooner suggest we break off ties with China than acknowledge that perhaps more thought should be given to whether there are serious issues surrounding this "The New Village" film.
In fact, isn’t it telling how reactive and sensitive Lim Guan Eng was to my remarks, when what I called for was a review by the censorship board? Even without having seen the film, it wasn’t too difficult to ascertain from the trailer that Communist insurgents were the protagonists painted as national heroes.
Now, unlike Lim Guan Eng, I am receptive to the nuances of history – I understand there can be different readings of historical accounts depending on which period one looks at, and I understand that people and organisations sometimes take up roles with inadvertent outcomes for others.
But one fact is indisputable – that the CPM terrorized and murdered thousands of Malaysians who did not bow to their wishes – many of whom died in gruesome circumstances, disemboweled and dismembered. It is from this sombre point of origin that my discomfort comes.
Lim Guan Eng accused me of stoking "the fire of racism and lies to further divide the nation with walls of hatred and fear" when I never once mentioned race in my initial remarks. And I didn’t for a good reason – because the pain inflicted by the CPM was not felt by one race, but by all Malaysians. And it is a Malaysian – not a Malay or UMNO or Utusan – outrage that occurs when there is any attempt at either historical revisionism or an unfair portrayal of history regarding the CPM
Instead of indulging in political platitudes – accusing his opponents as divisive, deceptive or hypocritical at every turn – I urge Lim Guan Eng to suspend his partisan judgment when it comes to matters that concern our identity and history as a people. That’s what statesmen do. He should try it sometime.
pada 29-07-2013 04:07 Ditulis Oleh Shawaliah Hadir
Pemimpin DAP macam Lim Guan Eng ada masalah untuk faham konteks. Konteks hubungan dengan parti teras sebuah kerajaan yang penting berbeza dengan konteks penolakan dan menyelar kezaliman Parti Komunis Malaya (PKM) - TF
SHAH ALAM: Setiausaha Agung DAP Lim Guan Eng tidak faham konteks hubungan diplomatik yang diadakan oleh Barisan Nasional (BN) dengan Parti Komunis China, kata Exco Pemuda Umno Tun Faisal Ismail Aziz.
Menurutnya, penubuhan sekretariat di antara Pemuda Barisan Nasional dan Liga Belia Komunis China (CYL) adalah berteraskan hubungan dan kerjasama negara, bukan kerjasama dengan pergerakan komunis Malaya.
Katanya, Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang itu jelas tidak maklum tentang faedah yang diperolehi negara hasil hubungan yang diadakan pada 12 Oktober 2009 dalam pelbagai bidang.
"Pemimpin DAP macam Lim Guan Eng ada masalah untuk faham konteks. Konteks hubungan dengan parti teras sebuah kerajaan yang penting berbeza dengan konteks penolakan dan menyelar kezaliman Parti Komunis Malaya (PKM).
"PKM bunuh rakyat (negara ini) dan lakukan sabotaj sedangkan Parti Komunis Cina tidak bunuh rakyat Malaysia dan merupakan rakan penting Malaysia dalam banyak bidang," katanya kepada Antaraposmenerusi sistem pesanan ringkas (SMS) hari ini.
Justeru kata Tun Faisal, Lim melakukan provokasi dengan bertindak mempertikaikan hubungan berkenaan.
Setiausaha Agung DAP itu dalam kenyataan medianya semalam, mendesak Umno untuk tampil menjelaskan hubungan parti itu dengan Parti Komunis Cina.
Beliau merujuk kenyataan anggota exco Pemuda Umno Lokman Noor Adam yang mempersoalkan bagaimana filem 'The New Village' yang didakwanya mengagungkan fahaman komunisme begitu mudah diluluskan berbanding filem ‘Tanda Putera’ yang berlatar belakangkan rusuhan kaum 13 Mei 1969.
Katanya lagi, Ketua Pemuda Umno pada 12 Oktober 2009 turut mengumumkan sekretariat tetap bagi mengukuhkan hubungan di antara Pemuda BN dengan CYL.
Lim juga membidas Umno yang tidak menentang tindakan kerajaan yang mengadakan hubungan diplomatik dengan negara-negara komunis seperti China, Cuba dan Vietnam.
Mengulas lanjut, Tun Faisal menegaskan kerajaan BN menolak sekeras-kerasnya Parti Komunis Malaya yang melakukan kekejaman kepada rakyat berbeza dengan Parti Komunis China.
Malahan jelasnya, pada era tahun 1970-an Perdana Menteri ketika itu, Tun Abdul Razak Hussin telah mengadakan hubungan diplomatik dengan China untuk menyebarkan penolakan rakyat kepada PKM.
Ini kerana PKM jelas mengancam keselamatan rakyat ketika itu kerana melakukan kezaliman.
"Sebab apa PKM ditolak kerana keganasan, kezaliman dan ideologi dan pendekatan yang tidak sesuai dengan rakyat Malaysia dan tanah Melayu ketika itu.
"Tun Razak buat hubungan diplomatik dengan China pada tahun 70-an, untuk jelaskan pendekatan PKM yang ditolak rakyat Malaysia dan supaya China menyisihkan PKM dan tidak lagi beri dana kepada PKM," tambah beliau.
Polemik timbul apabila Pemuda Umno mahu filem 'The New Village’, yang mengisahkan penempatan semula komuniti Cina sewaktu pencerobohan komunis diharamkan.
Filem itu didakwa secara halus mengangkat PKM sebagai hero dan meletakkan Rejimen Askar Melayu dan polis yang ketika itu berkhidmat dengan British sebagai musuh dan 'orang jahat' yang perlu dihapuskan.
sumber
