Let me take you back to yesteryear. It was a time of innocence, of play, of Rhonda pinching kids in the nursery when they had toy she wanted to play with. I watched her. I saw her scanning the room littered with plastic people, toddler paraphernalia, and puzzles. She would hone in on the coveted toy some poor schmo had patiently waited their their turn for and then yoink! A little pinchy-pinch, a little grabby-grab and the toy was all hers. Well, there was this one toy I had waited for two weeks to play with. A Fisher-Price Little People airplane. I had hovered around it waiting for the previous player to abandon it. My patience was rewarded and it was mine! No sooner had I said airplane when in stalked Rhonda. She went for the pinch. But she was thwarted. I was #4 of five children. I had two older brothers. My almost 3-year old self knew a little something something about defending oneself. I pinched back. This time, she cried and I was victorious. that's right, I had saved nursery from the bullying prowess of Rhonda the pincher.
So, here we are. I've aged, but it could be argued whether or not I have matured. But one things for certain, I'm not too fond of bullies. Pinchers and hair pullers are easy to spot. Nowadays, they come in disguise. They like to call themselves "moral relativists". I'm not sure all moral relativists are this way, so I'm not going to make a blanket statement, but it's my blog and I'm kinda going to. I've encountered a few of these moral relativists on Facebook and the Internet. You know who they are. You can spot them a mile away. Always pretending to play the devils advocate, but really, they are looking to glorify their own "superior" intelligence and are almost always bullies.
Here's how it usually plays out:
Someone posts an article or something that is predominately a Moral Law-type issue (homosexuality, pornography, drugs, etc). Responses will be posted with affirmations (that's horrible, I'm sorry, what's this world coming to?, etc). Then in creeps the moral relativist. "I'm just playing devil's advocate", "I'm not saying I agree with this, I just don't see what's wrong with x, y, or z." Most people will either ignore this person. One or two might respond once or twice, but back out when the bullying begins.
I used to do that because, let's face it, you can't reason with unreasonable people. And these people are unreasonable. They don't want to hear that people think what they are doing is bad, immoral, wrong or harmful (no one really does). They want to keep doing it and to feel justified in it, so they play the "I'm a moral relativist" card. And that's okay. I'm a believer in love the sinner, hate the sin. But do you want to know what sin I really hate? Bullying. Although, I like to avoid confrontations, I am just so sick of moral relativists pulling a Rhonda, pinching and pinching and getting away with it because most of the people out there are a little like me and don't want to come across as argumentative or just a plain mean old meanie.
So, lately, I've been pulling the pinch-protector card and I've stopped avoiding the confrontation. You ask for examples, you ask for opinions, you ask for truth or backed-by-science cold hard facts, I'm gonna give it to you. I'm gonna give it to you because I don't want the moral-law believers out there to be bullied anymore.
And it always happens. It never doesn't happen. They get the facts in their hands and they try to find someway to justify it's refutable. This is my favorite. Because they don't even seen how "moral un-relative" they are being. How can you say my truth isn't truth? How can you say that dude's truth over there isn't really truth? How can you say that scientists findings aren't truth? I thought it was all relative to you, man.
They denounce: "Well, you don't have any real experience with overdosing on drugs and dying. You only have a friend who OD'd and died, so you don't have any actual facts, you just 'know people'."
They never offer their own facts: For the record, I'm still waiting to hear about that double-blind study that tracked all those people that OD'd on drugs and had a good experience. Oh, you don't have anything like that? I didn't think so.
They ir-rationalize. "Drugs in moderation aren't bad."
Finally, they name call, belittle and bully: You are racist, conservative, brainwashed by your religion, don't have any of your own opinions, are freaking out over something little, are a hypocrite, not politically correct, etc.
I find this especially ironic since most of the people who I have watched engage in conversation with moral relativists never name call or resort to other such childish tactics. (In fact, these moral-law supporters have claim to not having to be reasonable because at least they chose a side.) Then, when everyone calls fowl on the name calling and bullying, the moral relativist turns tail, choosing to conveniently "opt out" of the conversation since it is obviously too beneath them to comment anymore.
Now, I admit, I am a conservative, I do have a religion. And whether moral relativists like it or not, I believe there is a law irrevocably decreed before the world began. I also believe you have your agency to believe in it or not, but it doesn't mean it's not still there pinching back all over your "what's right for me is right" mentality.
I'm pinching back, moral relativists. I'm pinching back because I'm sick of your bullying. It's just not good human behavior to ridicule, name call, or falsely accuse someone just because they don't fall in line with your personal views or practices. Um, how can I be wrong if it's all relative? I feel bad for true moral relativists out there because there's a bunch of bullies floating around giving them a bad name.