
This year I've made a resolution to seriously study at least one book on the cross, inspired by CJ Mahaney's helpful comments. Part of the fruit of that is reading Leon Morris' 'The Cross in the New Testament' which was given to me by Allan Rees ages ago and I have just finished. Leon Morris was an Australian evangelical theologian who wrote loads of good stuff, recently I've used his superb commentary on Matthew in the Pillar series.
Loads I could say about this book, helpful about the atonement in Luke (cos some people say Luke has nothing to say about Jesus as our substitute but he clearly does). I'd like to quote (in length!) one passage on the cross and the past:
'One great merit of the substitutionary way of viewing the atonement is that it makes a genuine attempt to face the problem of the past. Granted that any religion that claims to be adequate for men's needs must bring present peace of mind and the assurance of a transformed future, yet it is little short of astonishing to see how many writers on the Christian salvation content themselves with giving thought to the present and the future. They write as though good intentions were all-important, and treat the past as of no account....The power of positive thinking means much to modern man. We like the forward look, and phrases like 'morbid preoccupation with past sins' come easily to our lips. We take the injunctions of our psychiatrists and feel ourselves immensely superior to the men of previous generations who brooded and fretted over their misdeeds.
(Yet) The past is important. It cannot be shaken off. It cannot be ignored. It reaches in to the present and affects our status and our actions. Why should we think otherwise when God's judgement is in question? The heart and the conscience of man know that it is not otherwise. Neither here or anywhere else in our experience can the past be ignored. It rises up to haunt us and demands that justice be done to it. The problem of guilt is not solved by pretending it is not there. Sin must be faced and dealt with. Otherwise we will live with a perpetual sense of guilt and helplessness.
We cannot know peace at the deepest level until we have come to see that, though our guilt is real, so is God's forgiveness. Christ has dealt with our past...It is an outstanding merit of the substitutionary view, then, that it does not gloss over the past. It recognises it for the serious ans significant thing that it is. But it affirms that Christ has taken care of our past as He has taken care of every aspect of our need. He has paid the penalty. He has wiped out the sin. He has freed us from the entail of the past"
The Cross in the NT, p412-414
