Who, in this society, represents the grotesque?
Is it the personality, or is it the people who holds power and has knowledge?
Mary Shelley wrote in Frankenstein...
"My (The creature) sufferings were augmented also by the oppressive sense of injustice and ingratitude of their infliction. My daily vows rose for revenge, a deep and deadly revenge, such as would alone compensate for the outrages and anguish I had endured."
"You accuse me of murder and yet you would, with a satisfied conscience, destroy your own creature [...] I was benevolent; my soul glowed with love and humanity, but now I am alone. You, my creator, abhor me."
...Frankenstein, in his quest for knowledge, created a creation that has human-like form. To him, it is "abortive creation". The creature, hideous and ugly, was rejected by society, and more so detested by its own creator. Abandoned, it seeked revenge by murdering the loved ones dearest to its creator, and vowed to end its life in the end. Are we to judge the creature that it is entirely at fault?
That said, in today's world, when children make mistakes in school, are we to say that teachers are entirely at fault? What about the supposedly guidance and education at home? The absolute necessity of education starts from young, and at home, and I am not referring to the education such as learning to read and write.
养不教,父之过
教不严,师之惰
子不学,非所宜
幼不学 , 老何为
yang bu jiao, fu zhi guo
jiao bu yan, shi zhi duo
zi bu xue, fei suo yi
you bu xue, lao he wei