Thank you all SOOOOO much for all of the ideas for while I'm gone. I've done a combination of all of them, basically. Now, I need to spend some time actually preparing for the work I'm supposed to go do in the field... oof.
On a separate front...
Last week, we had a tenured faculty meeting in my dept to review the case of a guy who is up for tenure. The great thing about it was that he's a superstar and it is a slam dunk case.
The bad thing? I think that just about every single one of us felt bad after seeing his file.
11 papers per year on average during the tenure review period
5 major grants from federal granting agencies
400+ manuscripts peer-reviewed
12 graduate students, or more, each year in his lab, plus 1-3 postdocs
outstanding teacher awards out the wazoo
is that really, humanly possible?
Here's the math applied to my style:
I spend about 6-8 hours reviewing a paper. That would mean, for me, over a solid year of reviewing one paper a day and nothing else.
I spend about 1-2 hours a week interacting with each graduate student in my lab. That would mean that I'd be spending 20 hours a week on the care and feeding of graduate students.
Now add on all the paper writing, the class prep, the proposal writing and logistics. (I averaged about 3.5 peer-reviewed, solid papers (i.e., not counting book reviews or non-peer-reviewed stuff) published a year in my tenure review period, and I felt like I worked my ass off.)
How the hell does someone do this? AND, may I add, he's got a 4 year old. Granted, his wife is not of the academic sort but she does work almost full time.
And to top it off, he's a really nice guy. I want to hate him. I want to think that maybe there is some dubious thing going on here. But in reality, even if you consider that virtually all of those reviews were through his role as an associate editor for a journal, or that he was the lead PI on just two of those grants, it is still a fuck of a lot of work he's done.
Me is envious. And baffled. You ever seen such a thing?
On a separate front...
Last week, we had a tenured faculty meeting in my dept to review the case of a guy who is up for tenure. The great thing about it was that he's a superstar and it is a slam dunk case.
The bad thing? I think that just about every single one of us felt bad after seeing his file.
11 papers per year on average during the tenure review period
5 major grants from federal granting agencies
400+ manuscripts peer-reviewed
12 graduate students, or more, each year in his lab, plus 1-3 postdocs
outstanding teacher awards out the wazoo
is that really, humanly possible?
Here's the math applied to my style:
I spend about 6-8 hours reviewing a paper. That would mean, for me, over a solid year of reviewing one paper a day and nothing else.
I spend about 1-2 hours a week interacting with each graduate student in my lab. That would mean that I'd be spending 20 hours a week on the care and feeding of graduate students.
Now add on all the paper writing, the class prep, the proposal writing and logistics. (I averaged about 3.5 peer-reviewed, solid papers (i.e., not counting book reviews or non-peer-reviewed stuff) published a year in my tenure review period, and I felt like I worked my ass off.)
How the hell does someone do this? AND, may I add, he's got a 4 year old. Granted, his wife is not of the academic sort but she does work almost full time.
And to top it off, he's a really nice guy. I want to hate him. I want to think that maybe there is some dubious thing going on here. But in reality, even if you consider that virtually all of those reviews were through his role as an associate editor for a journal, or that he was the lead PI on just two of those grants, it is still a fuck of a lot of work he's done.
Me is envious. And baffled. You ever seen such a thing?