Our friends at DvK pointed out a little piece last week by Campell Brown (aka "skinny nose" - I mean no disrespect, but look, she has to have the skinniest nose I have ever seen.) where she asserts how the "exurbs" are the new battleground in the changing electorate of Minnesota. While there is plenty of truth in that assertion, I do not believe it is the full story. I also believe it sells short the a potential larger shift in the electorate.
If you look at the red and blue county map, you'll see Minnesota falling much like the rest of the country. Kerry carried the two cities (Minneapolis and St. Paul), the iron range (including Duluth) and a few other out-state counties. In these areas you find a strong blue collar labor group (Duluth, St. Paul & "the range"), minorities and four of the outstate counties won by Kerry also contained universities (Mankato, St. Peter, Northfield and Winona) where more liberal thoughts tend to prevail.
It is no mistake that the fourth largest city in Minnesota, Rochester, went red. Rochester has always been a Republican stronghold with IBM, Mayo Clinic and other professionals concentrated there.
The net gain for the democrats from 2000 to 2004 was 7 counties (two went Gore to Bush, nine went Bush to Kerry). There were some counties that definitely shifted hard for the democrats, but there is no doubt that some of these counties went blue simply because of Nader numbers went down a full 85% from his 2000 showing. I was always hopeful during the campaign, but I always told my friends that Bush would have a tough go in MN because he would be fighting a lot of Nader supporters who gave up on him in 2004. I think that proved itself true. Beltrami county is a perfect example. It went red in 2000 by a significant 1045 votes (6% margin). In 2004 Kerry won by 355 votes(1.7% margin), but Nader went from 1269 to 131 votes. So in Beltrami two things happened, Nader voters bailed and went Kerry and of the 24% increase in total votes, slightly more went to the Democrats.
I come from rural Minnesota and I think there is a little shift happening there. Some of the rural old DFL, emphasis on the "F" for farmer, are starting to realize that this is not your father's Democratic party. Oh, some are still voting for Humphrey and FDR, but I think more and more are seeing the light. The county of my youth, Brown, went 23% for Bush, up from 21% in 2000.
If you split the counties and set the line at 20,000, then this is how the numbers shake out. Bush carried 47 of the 62 smaller counties, 16 of the 25 counties over 20k people and if you look at the counties with more than 100k people, it is a 3 to 3 tie. The last number is deceiving though, because in these big counties Bush only took a 1, 1 and 8% victory where Kerry was pulling a 20, 27 and 31% victories. In Hennepin he took a 20% victory in a county of 640,000 votes, that is difficult to overcome.
So, there are some of my thoughts on the MN electorate. I'm still crunching some numbers because I want to see how the mid-terms will shake out. We are looking for a Kennedy and Pawlenty victory in '06.