Robert Roland <fake@ddress.no>: Jul 29 08:02PM +0200
>D1,4 test as short cct. I would take those out and check outside the circuit. If the short is at the output of the bridge rectifier, and all four diodes are good, you should measure a diode drop (0.6 V or so) across the diodes in both directions. -- RoRo |
"Dave M" <dgminala@mediacombb.net>: Jul 29 01:17PM -0500
Replace the shorted recctifiers!!!! As a precaution, replace all 4 of them; they're cheap. Even in circuit, they should not test as a short corcuit. Cheers, Dave M T i m wrote: |
tabbypurr@gmail.com: Jul 29 11:49AM -0700
On Saturday, 29 July 2017 19:03:01 UTC+1, Robert Roland wrote: > If the short is at the output of the bridge rectifier, and all four > diodes are good, you should measure a diode drop (0.6 V or so) across > the diodes in both directions. if you test individually: 0.6v one way only if testing at bridge input: 1.2v both ways An easy way to find faults is to run the psu via a filament light bulb, then it's easy to probe the [dangerously live] circuit for voltages with due care. Since I don't know if you can do this safely, don't do it. NT |
T i m <news@spaced.me.uk>: Jul 29 08:29PM +0100
On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 13:17:05 -0500, "Dave M" <dgminala@mediacombb.net> wrote: >Replace the shorted recctifiers!!!! As a precaution, replace all 4 of them; >they're cheap. Even in circuit, they should not test as a short corcuit. <snip> Thanks Robert / Dave, I haven't played much with SMPS (for obvious (safety) reasons) so assumed there might be some strange 'appears short but isn't in use' type thing going on. I should have pulled those diodes before asking here. ;-( However, I just desoldered one end of both and one appears to be dead short but the other was ok (but I've pulled them all). Problem is, while I probably have 1,000 IN4004's, I don't have any 1N4007's and I'm guessing we need the 1000V peak reverse / DC blocking voltage (rather than just 400) and 700 over 280V RMS? ;-( So, I can pick some of those up next week (eBay) or it looks like Maplin have 1N4007S's in stock but are they an acceptable equivalent? (Peak forward surge current, 30 not 50A)? http://pdf1.alldatasheet.com/datasheet-pdf/view/329384/CHENG-YI/IN4004.html http://www.mouser.com/ds/2/395/1N4001S%20SERIES_F15-1082941.pdf Cheers, T i m p.s. How long is a piece of string question but ... Is it 'likely' that diode just went (the charger is a good few years old now and has been used quite a bit), or is it more likely something further down the line took it out? |
T i m <news@spaced.me.uk>: Jul 29 08:38PM +0100
>> diodes are good, you should measure a diode drop (0.6 V or so) across >> the diodes in both directions. >if you test individually: 0.6v one way only Yeah, my diode test function was showing around 520mV on the good ones. >if testing at bridge input: 1.2v both ways Understood. >An easy way to find faults is to run the psu via a filament light bulb, I did remember that earlier and was going to rig up a plug - lamp -socket jig to make it easier. I thought I'd better ask here first. ;-) >then it's easy to probe the [dangerously live] circuit for voltages with due care. Understood. >Since I don't know if you can do this safely, don't do it. Understood. Whilst I have co-designed and scratch built plenty of mains powered kit (including disco sound-to-light, sequencers and strobes) I prefer not to be playing with live kit unless it's the only way (or the kit is very well mounted and otherwise insulated / protected, not just loose on the bench etc). Cheers, T i m |
"tom" <tmiller11147@verizon.net>: Jul 29 03:54PM -0400
"T i m" <news@spaced.me.uk> wrote in message news:h9npnct8gjd7pmoh3e9m6g7sh8rvm06721@4ax.com... > that diode just went (the charger is a good few years old now and has > been used quite a bit), or is it more likely something further down > the line took it out? It is likely that the off line switch regulator is also failed. Grab a copy of the TOP223Y datasheet to see the reference design for your supply. Here is a source for those chips: http://www.ebay.com/itm/5PCS-TOP223Y-Encapsulation-TO-220-Three-terminal-Off-line-PWM-Switch-/371080857393?hash=item5666248731:g:h~8AAOSwnLdWrEJR |
"Dave M" <dgminala@mediacombb.net>: Jul 29 02:59PM -0500
Yes, the 1N4007 recrifiers should be good replacements. Likely to be the only problem in your unit. As a precaution, you should check the large transistors on the board. They are likely to be high voltage MOSFETs, and should NOT be shorted or low resistance from drain to source or from gate to any other terminal. Best to take them off the board to test, since they're certain to be connected to the low resistance transformer windings, which could lead you astray. Cheers, Dave M T i m wrote: |
"tom" <tmiller11147@verizon.net>: Jul 29 04:02PM -0400
Dave, The "large transistors" are TOP223Y off line switching regulator ICs. Google the part number for the datasheet and reference design. Regards "Dave M" <dgminala@mediacombb.net> wrote in message news:1KmdnWTYV6-adOHEnZ2dnUU7-THNnZ2d@giganews.com... |
T i m <news@spaced.me.uk>: Jul 29 09:14PM +0100
On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 15:54:33 -0400, "tom" <tmiller11147@verizon.net> wrote: <snip> >> been used quite a bit), or is it more likely something further down >> the line took it out? >It is likely that the off line switch regulator is also failed. There are two in this PSU so could that apply to one or both? > Grab a copy >of the TOP223Y datasheet to see the reference design for your supply. I have looked at this: https://www.digchip.com/datasheets/parts/datasheet/373/TOP223Y-pdf.php ... and see roughly how it would work but not sure if that means I should be able to test it somehow? FWIW, I have one of the little component testers but I don't know if it will know what that is or even damage it? >Here is a source for those chips: >http://www.ebay.com/itm/5PCS-TOP223Y-Encapsulation-TO-220-Three-terminal-Off-line-PWM-Switch-/371080857393?hash=item5666248731:g:h~8AAOSwnLdWrEJR Thanks for that. However I am in the UK and but get them here also. ;-) Cheers, T i m |
T i m <news@spaced.me.uk>: Jul 29 09:22PM +0100
On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 16:02:34 -0400, "tom" <tmiller11147@verizon.net> wrote: >Dave, >The "large transistors" are TOP223Y off line switching regulator ICs. Google >the part number for the datasheet and reference design. Would you think one of those component testers would be able to identify the PWM reg, at least with a go/no-go result? From testing around there were no shorts around the devices but that doesn't stop them being OC or just non-functional? Cheers, T i m |
"tom" <tmiller11147@verizon.net>: Jul 29 04:23PM -0400
"T i m" <news@spaced.me.uk> wrote in message news:2nqpnct2pd9g7dna6m64vudnfotf5k1t9h@4ax.com... > Thanks for that. However I am in the UK and but get them here also. > ;-) > Cheers, T i m A quick ohmmeter check across the three pins should not show a short circuit. If it does so in circuit, you may need to remove the device to check. |
"tom" <tmiller11147@verizon.net>: Jul 29 04:32PM -0400
"T i m" <news@spaced.me.uk> wrote in message news:2nqpnct2pd9g7dna6m64vudnfotf5k1t9h@4ax.com... > Thanks for that. However I am in the UK and but get them here also. > ;-) > Cheers, T i m Look at fig 8 in the datasheet for how your unit works. If I read your post right, this charges LiIon batteries, right? So the outputs should be about 4.0 to 4.2 volts. There is some feedback coming from the battery that probably looks at the battery temperature for a safety shutdown. You could probably reverse engineer the whole schematic (or half of it) to get a better view of what is going on. BTW, the transformer on the right next to the capacitor is not a transformer. It is a common mode choke for RFI filtering. |
T i m <news@spaced.me.uk>: Jul 29 09:57PM +0100
On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 16:32:22 -0400, "tom" <tmiller11147@verizon.net> wrote: <snip> >> should be able to test it somehow? FWIW, I have one of the little >> component testers but I don't know if it will know what that is or >> even damage it? <snip> >Look at fig 8 in the datasheet for how your unit works. OK. Again, I get the rough idea but I was more into digital electronics than SMPSU etc. >If I read your post >right, this charges LiIon batteries, right? Sorry, no, it's a general purpose multi-cell NiCad / NiMh charger Tom. http://www.conrad.com/medias/global/ce/2000_2999/2500/2500/2503/250363_RB_00_FB.EPS_1000.jpg http://www.ansmann.de/en/service/downloads/send/6-bedienungsanleitungen-aelterer-produkte/66-5207123-energy-16 <snip> The PSU board feeds a fairly complex logic / output board (4 PSU outputs to the logic board) and in turn the 16 charger outputs. >You could probably reverse engineer the whole schematic (or half of it) to >get a better view of what is going on. Ok. >BTW, the transformer on the right next to the capacitor is not a >transformer. It is a common mode choke for RFI filtering. Ah, ok, thanks ... that (now) makes more sense as even with that (choke) in and D1-4 out, I've lost the short I was seeing across the mains input. ;-) Cheers, T i m |
"tom" <tmiller11147@verizon.net>: Jul 29 05:17PM -0400
"T i m" <news@spaced.me.uk> wrote in message news:respncdm39h95fhbhrnaukpaaet7f92nbb@4ax.com... > (choke) in and D1-4 out, I've lost the short I was seeing across the > mains input. ;-) > Cheers, T i m Ok, good. That makes more sense for why so many outputs. Doing any measurements on this device (scope, etc) will require an isolation transformer to look at the primary (line) side. The outputs all appear to be isolated. Hope it's just the shorted diodes. Good luck. Regards |
tabbypurr@gmail.com: Jul 29 02:27PM -0700
On Saturday, 29 July 2017 20:59:12 UTC+1, Dave M wrote: > the low resistance transformer windings, which could lead you astray. > Cheers, > Dave M I've been led astray by small amounts of capacitance before NT |
T i m <news@spaced.me.uk>: Jul 29 10:38PM +0100
On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 17:17:26 -0400, "tom" <tmiller11147@verizon.net> wrote: <snip> >> (choke) in and D1-4 out, I've lost the short I was seeing across the >> mains input. ;-) >Ok, good. That makes more sense for why so many outputs. It's quite an expensive unit (I think it cost me ~100 UKP some years ago) so I'd like to get it going if I can. >Doing any measurements on this device (scope, etc) will require an isolation >transformer to look at the primary (line) side. Understood. >The outputs all appear to be >isolated. Ok. >Hope it's just the shorted diodes. Fingers crossed. ;-) >Good luck. Thanks for your help and I'll let you know how I get on. Cheers, T i m |
tabbypurr@gmail.com: Jul 29 02:45PM -0700
On Saturday, 29 July 2017 22:38:41 UTC+1, T i m wrote: > >> Ah, ok, thanks ... that (now) makes more sense as even with that > >> (choke) in and D1-4 out, I've lost the short I was seeing across the > >> mains input. ;-) you would, 99% of the time > >Good luck. > Thanks for your help and I'll let you know how I get on. > Cheers, T i m if it's only 1 bad diode try running it without it, on half load or less it should be ok. 2x400v diodes in series should do as replacements temporarily. NT |
T i m <news@spaced.me.uk>: Jul 29 11:17PM +0100
On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 14:45:34 -0700 (PDT), tabbypurr@gmail.com wrote: <snip> >if it's only 1 bad diode try running it without it, on half load or less it should be ok. Now I've got them all out it seems to be two bad diodes but one was reading strange things so maybe died fully as I got it out? >2x400v diodes in series should do as replacements temporarily. Ok, I can give that a go tomorrow ... especially as I have so many 1N4004's. ;-) Cheers, T i m |