For the first time at QuakeCon, John Carmack showed off his talents as a lecturer as he gave a one hour talk on the Physics of Light and Rendering, which covered everything from rasterization to ray tracing and also path tracing. As the pioneer and godfather of 3D first person shooter games and the creator of the most popular 3D game engine of all time (the Quake 3 engine which is still being used in heavily modified form in all of the Call of Duty games) Carmack is still regarded as the highest authority on real-time game graphics, which makes this lecture on physically based rendering (a rendering method which until recently was strictly reserved for the academic research community and for offline production rendering) both surprising and remarkable. And when he divulges his view on the future of game graphics, you can be sure his ideas will be copied by every other game developer.
Some interesting tidbits:
- while Carmack believed that voxels were the way forward to do efficient ray tracing in the past (see
Jon Olick's SVO research for id Software at Siggraph 2008), but today he thinks ray tracing triangles is the most efficient way and all ray tracing will be against triangles, because most content creation tools are built around triangle meshes
- Carmack thinks that path tracing will be the way forward for all kinds of rendering, offline and real-time and the whole industry is moving towards it, because it's easier and much more accurate to create immersive lifelike graphics for movies and games with accurate global illumination, shadows and reflections
- Brigade gets briefly mentioned at around 1:04:00. Did a quick transcript of the Brigade fragment:
"[...] It does seem likely that the path forward is lots and lots of rays, physically accurate material definitions and approaches that are approximations of the sampling of path tracing. We can do, there are some neat demos going around today, like the Brigade path tracing demo which is real-time and it's doing simple path tracing from a parallel outdoor light and it's noisy and fizzly as it comes in, but you can stop and watch it come in more crisply. And eventually this is going to be the way things go, this is going to be the way we're gonna be rendering, but we still have maybe a couple of magnitudes before it's really competitive. I think one more order of magnitude in performance and you'll start seeing it used for some real things, but still, you have to have a good reason to step away from rasterization. But probably when we get two orders of magnitude, then you start seeing it as one of the more general tools. And the reason that it's winning in the offline world, even though it's still slower, people still care about how long their renderings take even if you're making a feature film or tv commercial, it matters for your iteration time. But the sense is that you get more out of this being understandable. [...]"
- Carmack is pushing the artists at id Software to adopt a more physically accurate material rendering system
While I don't fully agree that we need another magnitude of performance (Brigade can path trace outdoor scenes in real-time today with very little noise), it is great to see that path tracing is acknowledged by Carmack as the eventual future not only for offline rendering, but also for real-time game graphics. The future of GPU path tracers like Octane/Brigade has never been brighter.
