Let's Talk About the Two-State Solution

"Helen Thomas press pals condone racist rant? Heaven forbid "esteemed" press corps represent society's enlightened elite; rest of us choose truth"

Sarah Palin, on her Twitter account.

Exactly who are these members of the White House press corps that condone Thomas's racist rant. Thomas's remarks are getting condemned from the Left and Right. No member of the White House press corps would even think about defending Thomas.

Thomas's and Palin's comments reduce the Israeli-Palistinian conflict to the Red Sox & Yankees baseball rivalry. The United States isn't suppose to have a side to root for. The Obama administration needs to make the Israelis and Palistinians realize a two-state solution is the only viable answer. Debating which ethnic group should stay or go is counter productive. The 1947 United Nations Partition Plan for Palistine would have created two-states. The plan was rejected by Palistine Arab Higher Committee.

The Israeli and Palistinian conflict has conplicated America's foreign policy and been politically polarizing domestically. I don't buy the neo-conservative arguement that defending Israel is inperative to the United States nation security. I do wish to see the years of bloodshed on both sides end.

Robert Gibbs Ducks Public Option Question

Chuck Todd asked Press Sec. Robert Gibbs about the failure to pass the public option in the Senate Finance Committee. Helen Thomas asked Gibbs was asked why isn't Obama "fighting" for the public option. Gibbs would only say that the President supports choice and competition. Gibbs would not promise the President demanding a public option.

Q Health care — yesterday the Senate Finance Committee voted down two different versions of the public option, and I don’t believe we’ve heard from the White House officially on how — is this — is the President disappointed that the Senate — that no public option has made it through Senate Finance Committee, since this is something that he’s –

MR. GIBBS: I would say — I would reiterate what the President said in front of the joint session of Congress — it’s a proposal he favors in getting choice and competition. We’re working with all in Congress to figure out how best to provide that choice and competition. You’ve got one bill right now that doesn’t include a public option; you have four bills that do. This is part of the legislative process in reconciling all these ideas.

Q So why doesn’t he fight for it?

MR. GIBBS: We’re fighting for choice and competition and –

Q But not the public option.

MR. GIBBS: — and trying to get — go ahead.

Q Max Baucus said his reason for voting against it is that he could count votes — sort of implying — I guess he was trying to imply that he’s supportive of the idea, but because it didn’t have the votes he didn’t want to vote for it in committee. Does the President share that sort of same mind-set as Senator Baucus, that you can be — you’re not going to get everything you want, so — he supports it, but if the votes aren’t there, the votes aren’t there?

MR. GIBBS: Again, the most important thing — and you’ve heard the President say this — the most important thing is choice in competition; that in the individual and small business insurance market, if you have a geographic region that’s dominated by only one entity, you tend not to have — you certainly don’t have choice and it tends not to breed competition. We will work with Congress to find the best option for how to do that.

Q But you’re not going to sign a bill that doesn’t have something that in your mind — take your state of Alabama example — if Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama has still got 90 percent of the market, then you’re not signing that bill?

MR. GIBBS: The President I think has made it extremely clear that without choice and competition you won’t have health reform. We will ensure that whatever is passed in health reform meets that obligation.