I am here to weigh in on the recent news about removing Adam Lambert off the countdown concert Singapore.
First of all, I would just like to lay some ground work before I am misunderstood. I am a Christian, I signed the petition, but I am not a homophobe. I would also label myself as more conservative than liberal as compared to my peers. But I identify myself as more liberal if I compare to traditional Christians. I am in favour of bringing Singapore's arts scene to a higher level, because I am some sort of musician myself. I used to listen to Adam Lambert, but not because he came out of the closet; just simply a change in taste and preferences. I admire Adam Lambert for his ability to belt, to sing notes even higher than me. I remember this song when he hit an A5, which was something that make me felt ashamed cos I couldn't do it. That was awesome to me. Adam Lambert was also mentioned as a good singer in some of my singing classes - a guy who had the right techniques and power. To sum up, I think Adam Lambert's a great singer.
I received the news to sign the petition. That was shocking, because I didn't know he had some controversial performance over in the States. Googled a little, saw some obscene pictures like holding a girl to his crotch, or even kissing a guy. Sure, this can be categorized as 'just art' or 'just entertainment', but I was concerned that this kind of content may be aired on national TV.
I read what the petition said. It said they were extremely concerned that these obscene acts will be shown to family-friendly audiences. Furthermore, it was the end of our Jubilee year and Lambert with his controversies shouldn't be brought in, especially since his Western liberal ideals may clash with the Singaporean majority. Also there were talks about having local artists replace Lambert, since it was a year of OUR celebration. I signed the petition because I thought it was inappropriate to air these uncensored obscenities to families and children. And particularly I don't really believe in the power of petitions because it misrepresents the entire population (I could go on about that but let's just say petition don't always lead to real change).
Of course with everything there will be a reverse discourse. Those who were angered rebutted with another petition - to demand Adam Lambert to perform. Most of the reasons cited was that music and arts should not be banned, and by doing so, will lead to us being a backward nation. Also, I assume most people who are standing on this side champions LGBT rights, since Adam Lambert is outrightly gay. They would also have assumed that the individuals who started the petition in the first place are Christian homophobes.
The issue gets complicated here - first, his controversies of obscene acts on stage. Second, he's gay. One compounds the other. If one did not exist, then there might not be such a huge fuss about that. I can bet that many artistes and singers are gay, but they are allowed to perform on stage as long as they do it appropriately. The big fuss is the worry that he will perform obscene acts on stage, and while we can educate our children that he's doing it just "For (our) Entertainment" (pun intended!), we will never know if children have the ability to separate what's on screen and what's reality. I agree with that. No obscene acts. But things gets complicated when the LGBT issue layers in. People who supports Adam Lambert in his visit here would assume that the other half of Singapore is banning Lambert just because he's gay. The issue cannot be narrowly defined like that (I'm speaking to both sides here).
And this whole fuss was because the countdown was going to be aired on national TV (I assume?). If it was just a concert, I guess his fans would probably be ok with that. And discretion would be highly given by his audiences.
Honestly, I'm ok with him performing if he promises not to do anything obscene at all, but there's no way of knowing whether he'll keep to that. But then again, what is 'obscene'? Everyone can define and misdefine obscenity.
Before I move on, I would like to say that I should have done more research before making a stand and signing the petition. I jumped too quick into conclusions, which is something I should not have done. I tried to see how obscene his acts and a quick search "Adam Lambert controversies" on YouTube revealed that. However, these were dated in 2009. So I thought, "hmm, there must be more recent ones" and nope, I couldn't find any, at least not on YouTube. I took my search to Google and found the same thing. No recent controversial or obscene performances. I then watched this performance on June 2015, by Good Morning America, the same news platform that cancelled his performance in 2009. Honestly, his performance was great. I would have totally enjoyed it. He did nothing obscene of that sort, and heck, I didn't even know he changed his style. I am totally cool if this is the style of performance he will replicate in Singapore.
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMqbMBLLX2c)
What's my conclusion? I'm just saddened by how this can divide people. It's gonna make it worse for us Christians because now they would think we are some self-righteous people who claim to love but yet hate to be inclusive. And honestly, they think we are ridiculous. But it doesn't have to be that way. No, I am not saying we should embrace their ideals, and no, I know we are meant to be the light in this world. And being a light doesn't mean an 'easy' life, being a disciple of Jesus may face prosecution, rejection, hatred. If I have to ridiculed and rejected to stand up for my beliefs, I will. But it's just so sad that now both sides are trying to shut both sides out.. You know what I mean? It's like who has the biggest voice will win the game. It's really not about winning the petition or getting Lambert to stay away. But for now - it's the point of no return. Whoever 'gets' what they 'want' would legitimize their own beliefs. And then resistance will happen again and the story goes on.
At the end of the day, I think creating a petition was unnecessary. Firstly its effectiveness is rather limited (I did research and papers on this). It gives people the false idea that they're making some real change but in fact, it's just a click on their trackpad. It would discourage people in the future to stand up (physically) for some real change. It encourages hiding behind the keyboard (ok fine, I am slapping myself in the face here then). I didn't write this to convince anyone whoever's right or wrong. I am writing this for myself. Or I am writing this for my friends to understand the situation. Or I am just writing this because there are some thoughts that are currently exploding in my head.
Lastly, if we were to ban Adam Lambert, then we would have to be consistent. Any other female singers who would want to perform in Singapore would have to go through this 'purity' check. She must not have faced any controversies in the past (so Miley and Nicki, you're out). My point is, there must be some sort of consistency to determine whether one can perform in Singapore or not. There cannot be any gender-bias in this case. As we all know, it's quite impossible isn't it? So I would suggest regulation. We welcome these singers here, but they have to understand our mainstream culture and belief system, and there should be a statement of what's appropriate or inappropriate. I know regulation kills the arts, but if we want Singapore to remain as a nation, I don't think these steps are ridiculous.
(unedited)