• (function() { (function(){function b(g){this.t={};this.tick=function(h,m,f){var n=f!=void 0?f:(new Date).getTime();this.t[h]=[n,m];if(f==void 0)try{window.console.timeStamp("CSI/"+h)}catch(q){}};this.getStartTickTime=function(){return this.t.start[0]};this.tick("start",null,g)}var a;if(window.performance)var e=(a=window.performance.timing)&&a.responseStart;var p=e>0?new b(e):new b;window.jstiming={Timer:b,load:p};if(a){var c=a.navigationStart;c>0&&e>=c&&(window.jstiming.srt=e-c)}if(a){var d=window.jstiming.load; c>0&&e>=c&&(d.tick("_wtsrt",void 0,c),d.tick("wtsrt_","_wtsrt",e),d.tick("tbsd_","wtsrt_"))}try{a=null,window.chrome&&window.chrome.csi&&(a=Math.floor(window.chrome.csi().pageT),d&&c>0&&(d.tick("_tbnd",void 0,window.chrome.csi().startE),d.tick("tbnd_","_tbnd",c))),a==null&&window.gtbExternal&&(a=window.gtbExternal.pageT()),a==null&&window.external&&(a=window.external.pageT,d&&c>0&&(d.tick("_tbnd",void 0,window.external.startE),d.tick("tbnd_","_tbnd",c))),a&&(window.jstiming.pt=a)}catch(g){}})();window.tickAboveFold=function(b){var a=0;if(b.offsetParent){do a+=b.offsetTop;while(b=b.offsetParent)}b=a;b<=750&&window.jstiming.load.tick("aft")};var k=!1;function l(){k||(k=!0,window.jstiming.load.tick("firstScrollTime"))}window.addEventListener?window.addEventListener("scroll",l,!1):window.attachEvent("onscroll",l); })();

    Tuesday, December 12, 2006

    You can get me one of these for Christmas!

    It may not be available just yet, but you can put our names on the list for the ROLLERtoaster when it hits the market. It is definitely the toaster of the future. Sleek and compact, the toaster was designed by Jaren Goh of Singapore and won a 2006 Red Dot Design Award for innovation. Goh was inspired by the change of televisions from large and bulky boxes to streamlined flat-panels which retained all the functionality of the larger unit in a much more compact product. He applied that to a common appliance,the toaster, and the ROLLERtoaster was born. Slices of bread are "fed" into one side of the machine and are rolled through, fully toasted, to the other side where your plate awaits. The only potential problem is that it doesn't look like it will be able to handle bagels easily. Then again, neither do a lot of other toasters, so perhaps it's not as big a problem as one might think.

    Friday, December 08, 2006

    December 8

    A Dutch art company has produced a DVD so lonely people don't have to eat Christmas dinner alone. The DVD features dining companions eating, drinking and making conversation. It features six different actors reading different scripts so people can pick their choice of company. One of the DVDs producers says, "The actors can offer him or her a romantic evening or even a good discussion. We have a good variety in the choice of our table companions."

    Friday, December 01, 2006

    December 1

    Marketers for the California Milk Processor Board say their plan to make San Francisco bus shelters smell like warm cookies is a risky venture. The board plans to install aromatic strips designed to emulate the scent of freshly baked chocolate chip cookies in five of the city's shelters for a month-long trial. But because no one has done it before, and San Francisco is seen as very politically correct, there's some concern that not everyone will like it.

    Thursday, November 30, 2006

    Wow things have changed....





    Wednesday, November 22, 2006

    News...

    November 22
    The City of Chesapeake, Virginia, "The City that Cares", has been trying for 10 years to get the domain name chesapeake.com, but couldn't because someone else had beat them to it. The city's Public Communications Coordinator didn't think the city would ever get it, but it kept trying while continuing to use cityofchesapeake.net. Finally, the company which owned chesapeake.com got tired of the pestering from the city of Chesapeake and gave it to them for free. And once ownership was transferred, the city council sold the domain to natural gas producer Chesapeake Energy Corp. for $120,000.

    Saturday, November 18, 2006

    Follow up...

    The Three Competitors!


    So after posting my initial emails to Del Monte Foods (Starkist Tuna), I got a number of responses and decided to stage a Tuna Showdown between Starkist Tuna and any other brand (I chose my favorite, Chicken of The Sea). The following people were present: Steven Johnson, Samantha Recinto, and Matthew Rigsby.

    The Analysis:
    This was the set up. There were 3 Tuna products: Starkist Chunk Light Tuna (6oz can), Starkist Chunk Light Tuna (3oz pouch), and Chicken of The Sea Chunk Light Tuna (6oz can). The 2 cans range in cost from $0.30-$0.50. The Pouch was purchased on sale for $0.88 and generally costs $0.90-$1.05. All of them should theoretically contain 3oz of tuna, the cans holding an additional 3 oz of water.

    Each product was drained (the cans were squeezed) and then the contents inside were analyzed after water removal was no longer possible. First the size of chunks was observed, as well as the overall quality/appearance. The Chicken of The Sea Tuna was drained further in a strainer, but the process was deemed unnecessary, as only an unmeasurable amount was added. This was not related to ease of draining, the practice was simply discontinued. Next, the remaining water for each product was measured. An exception to this was the pouch of Starkist Tuna, as our measuring equipment could not detect what would have seemed to have been only a few mL. Finally, the Tuna was taste tested.

    The Analysis was judged on 4 different levels:

    1. Size and quality of tuna chunks (since they are all called chunk light Tuna)
    2. Ease of removing water
    3. Quantity of water removed
    4. Overall appearance/taste

    The Results:

    1 Size and Quality: The unquestionable winner was Chicken of The Sea Tuna. For reference, please view the attached photos. There were noticeably large chunks of tuna in the Chicken of The Sea can, whereas the Starkist can appeared in more of a shredded state. Many of the observers suggested that that was always how Tuna looked. However, a simple reflection of the name of the product (CHUNK light tuna, as opposed to SHREDDED light tuna) indicates the failure of the Starkist product in this category. The pouch of tuna was of the poorest quality in chunk size and quality. Whether because of its packaging, or because of flake selection, the pouch of tuna was closer to a crumble than either shreds, flakes, or chunks.

    The Chicken of The Sea Chunk Quality Seen Up Close
    The Starkist Can Quality Seen Up Close
    The Starkist Pouch Quality Seen Up Close


    Winner: Chicken of The Sea (2. Starkist Can 3. Starkist Pouch)

    2. Water Removal: Disallowing previous bias, the 2 cans were equally mediocre in the ability to remove water. The Starkist can was significantly thinner and less durable. However, a can grip and squeeze device was used, so the quality of the can was not testable. The pouch was by far the easiest in removing water, simply because there was not a whole lot of water to remove. Both cans made small spills outside of the collecting bowl, due to the draining pressure. The pouch did not.

    Winner: Starkist Pouch (2. Both Can Versions)

    3. Quantity of Water (and therefore Quantity of Tuna): While significantly accurate devices were not employed, the quantity of water was measured for both cans. One point of note is that the theoretically correct amount of water in a can should be about 88-89 mL (3 oz). The Chicken of The Sea placed at approx. 90 mL. The Starkist Can placed at approx. 95-98 mL. The pouch, as stated before, held very little liquid. A few points to add, though, are first, the pouch weighed 3 oz, so any water means that there is less than 3 oz of tuna. The water for this product is not measurable against the cans. Also, because of the poor chunk quality of Starkist, it is arguable that more water was retained by Starkist, even though it produced more water. This could potentially mean that there is 5-10 mL more water in the Starkist can than in the Chicken of The Sea can.
    The Water Quantity for Chicken Of The Sea. While it looks fuzzy, this was agreed upon at approx. 90 mL.
    The Water Quantity for Starkist Tuna (can). While the exact amount is not known, all observers agreed that there was more water for Starkist, estimated at approx. 95-98 mL.


    Winner: Chicken of The Sea Can (2. Starkist Pouch 3. Starkist Can)

    4. The Chicken of The Sea Tuna was also rated most appealing, and was the best tasting can. This was in comparison to the visual product of both Starkist products. One important note is that the pouch tuna did have a lot more flavor, assumedly because the taste is not diluted in water. However, the Starkist can tasted like watery tuna, or tuna water, either one.

    Winner: Can: Chicken of The Sea (2. Starkist) Pouch: Starkist (for flavor)



    Conclusions:

    After the test, when asked which product they would prefer, all observers selected Chicken of The Sea Tuna over Starkist. Matt Rigsby went so far as to choose the Chicken of The Sea Can ($0.40-$0.50) over the Starkist Pouch ($0.90-$1.05).

    Personal Conclusion:
    While I will feign respect at the pouch of Starkist Tuna, I must solidly attest to the quality of Chicken of The Sea's Tuna. COTS's base product, Chunk Light Tuna, beat out it's competitor's upgraded product costing twice as much. That competitor was Starkist. I am really glad that i convinced all of the observers to purchase COTS over Starkist, because i really can't stand starkist. In fact, I didn't even buy the can to hold to showdown. I refused to. I really can't wait to email Del Monte and let them know that I posted this on facebook, and convinced at least 3 friends to not buy Starkist again. That's what they get for providing a poor product, and then pretending like it's cuz they can't catch fish sometimes.

    Love,
    Grady

    Tuesday, November 14, 2006

    football penalty kick

    yeah, so this is kinda funny...

    November 12

    A teenage driver in Australia threatened two police officers when he was pulled over for an alcohol breath test. Police say the 17-year-old blew a .13 on the blood alcohol test and when they began to question him, he picked up a snake that was slithering on the roadside and pointed its head at the officers. Police told the teen to drop the snake but he ran off still clutching his weapon. He was captured moments later.

    Wednesday, November 08, 2006

    I thought this was funny...

    Well, the guy that wrote this used to work at FedEx with me. It is kind of long but I thought it was really funny...here goes....


    So I Got Angry At Starkist Tuna The Other Day, And This Was The Result:


    Dear Starkist,I wanted to email to alert you that I now intend to never again purchase Starkist tuna, in any shape or form. Please let me explain.I have long incorporated Tuna as a steady part of my diet. I think it tastes great and is a great way to get protein. Way back about 7 years ago, i made no real issue as to what brand of tuna i bought, as all of it was fairly inexpensive. One thing I did notice, though, was that the size of the tuna chunks began to get smaller. In fact, when I saw that Starkist came out with Select, I switched over to Select because I knew I would be getting tuna and not mush. And I did, Select definitely has more meat, and larger chunks. Here's where the problem comes in. The prices kept rising, and I didn't feel like paying as much as I was for Select Tuna, so I went back to regular Tuna. Starkist Chunk Light was much worse than I had remembered it (or had gotten worse). First, it's impossible to even drain a can of your regular tuna. Really... The tuna is so fine, that the water doesn't leave it. It's like a puree. It makes me angry and I don't even want to eat it when I'm done trying to squeeze it out. You must know this happens. How could you not? It doesn't matter how much you shift the lid back and forth, or whether you have a lid holder or a can squeezer, or whether you take a lid off and try to strain the tuna, or whatever, the water does not come out without most of the tuna. So then I have a mess all over myself and my kitchen, and the tuna still isn't drained.Second, When and if i get water away from the tuna, i still have just a slimy paste, and it's not an enjoyable texture or taste. Instead of flakes of tuna, it's more like i'm eating watery pate that tastes like tuna water. So, after too many times of frustration, i decided to start loyally purchasing a different brand, and not starkist. Chicken of the Sea, for example, has a product that is basically like Starkist Select, at the Chunk Light Bottom of the line price. Why would I buy your product? Starkist doesn't taste significantly better, i feel like i get a lot more with Chicken of the Sea, I don't get frustrated with the can because it drains just fine (since they have actual chunks of tuna), and their can is a little bit thicker, so it doesn't get bent when i'm trying to drain it (not that i ever have to push to hard on their can). Keep in mind, I'm concerned about cost, and final product that I eat, not so much about companies unless it concerns the final product i'm paying for and eating. I am pretty happy with Chicken of The Sea though, i will say.What this all meant was that I stopped buying Starkist Tuna, and unless I was given a can, I didn't eat any. Actually, funny story, i was given a can of Starkist, got really angry at the experience, and decided I didn't even want cans given to me for FREE! That was a few years ago, probably about 1.5-2. I was at the store the other day though, and your pouches of tuna were on sale. I hadn't ever planned to buy pouches because, from most consumers' points of view, the pouches had been designed to increase profit for the same product as what used to be in the cans. That explained to me why the basic can went to garbage when you (and other tuna companies) introduced Select cans and Fresh Seal Pouches. Anyway, your pouches were on sale so I said, ok, I'll just by them. They cost about double what a can costs so I figured was going to at least get a pretty good product. And it's not like there was a lot of water in it....Well, I had a pouch today, and while there wasn't any water in it, it was the same amount of Tuna i would have gotten had i been able to press the water out of the can. So now, to me Starkist has degraded to the point that I pay double just to be able to have tuna instead of tuna water paste. I ended up adding a can of chicken of the sea tuna to your pouch in order to get a full meal out of it..... I am very disappointed. But I hope I am more resolute. I intend to never purchase Tuna from Starkist again, if I can somehow manage to do that.


    After A Few Days, Del Monte Foods Responded:


    Dear Grady,
    Thank you for your e-mail about StarKist Tuna. We're glad you took the time to contact us and appreciate the opportunity to respond.It's important to us that every can and pouch of StarKist Tuna meet the high standards consumers expect from our products. Because tuna are highly migratory and swim in oceans around the world, we're unable to eliminate some inherent natural variability that can impact the color or firmness of the tuna. For example, factors such as water temperature and diet, as well as size, age and species (for light meat tuna), all play a role in determining the characteristics of a particular fish. Nevertheless, we make every effort to obtain only the highest quality fish, so we sincerely regret your disappointment.Our chunk style tuna contains tuna that has been chopped into chunk size pieces prior to packing. Because of the natural variation of the fish, occasionally pieces of the tuna will break apart during this process. We certainly agree with you that a large amount of small pieces and flakes is not desirable and we are constantly looking for ways to maintain the ideal chunk size.The information you've provided will be helpful in our efforts to continually improve our products, and we assure you your report will be brought to the attention of our Quality Assurance Management.Thanks again for contacting us. Our reputation is built on quality and consumer satisfaction and we apologize for not living up to these expectations in this instance. In an effort to restore your confidence in our products, we are sending complimenarty coupons to you via postal mail. If you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to contact us.

    Jackie, Del Monte Consumer Affairsconsumeraffairs@delmonte.comDel Monte. Nourishing families. Enriching lives. Every Day.When contacting us, please refer to the following reference number: 004197488A



    Having Received This Email, This Is How I Responded:

    Hi Jackie,
    Thanks for the coupons. I gave them away, since my last email made me think about how i don't even want Starkist Tuna when I get it for free.If it's important to Del Monte to meet the high standards of consumers, then why do you keep making it that way? I mean, you tell me you want to meet them, but then the rest of the email has hypothetical reasons of why you don't make that standard. Plus, the answers you gave were very round about ways of avoiding the discussion. For example, you say that Tuna are highly migratory, which we can agree on. I had the picture book about how a tuna fish sandwich was made as a child. What I might suggest, since you are looking for the highest quality of fish, is that you have your ships follow the ships that supply companies like Chicken of The Sea. Their fish aren't highly susceptible to small flakes and chunks apparently, those being things that are affected by the migration patterns of Tuna. Come on... Are you really trying to tell me that the reason Starkist Chunk Light Tuna looks the way it does is because the type of Tuna that was caught falls apart easily, and mixes into the can water until it is impossible to separate? Speaking of which, in what ways are you looking to maintain the ideal chunk size. And what is the ideal chunk size for Del Monte, because it seems to me that Starkist Chunk Light Tuna consistently has a shredded puree appearance to it. This tells me that if you really are trying to maintain ideal chunk size for your cans of Chunk Light Tuna, then Del Monte's ideal size is a shredded puree. Seriously Jackie, are you really trying to meet the standards of the consumers? It looks like you are trying to dictate what those standards are by repackaging a product to raise the cost, and filling the void with leftover Tuna slush. On top of that, I think that my standards are arguably low, not because I demand an unreasonable price for quality tuna, but because your competitors are achieving high quality, while you are sending me poor explanations as to why this is. If you really wanted to meet the high standards of consumers, stop selling chunk light tuna the way you do now. It's not an accident, and it's not based on a poor spawning season. I didn't even begin to address the can issue again, but I'll throw that in too. You must know how frustrating it is to eat a can of chunk light tuna. If there was any reason, why wouldn't that be enough to convince you to change your product? It's a joke to send me coupons and an email when i can see it won't change anything in your chunk light tuna. In conclusion, here's to not purchasing Starkist Tuna again.

    Sincerely (not going to buy Starkist),Grady Behrens

    If your still down here with me,Hey! I've got a fun idea: send an email to consumeraffairs@delmonte.com. It can be about anything, it doesn't have to be about Tuna. But, when you do, just make sure to use this reference number: 004197488A

    Thursday, November 02, 2006

    Its been a little while so....heres two...

    November 2
    A Chester County, Pennsylvania, car dealership offered a unique incentive for shoppers hunting for a deal -- free shotguns. Country Dodge offered a certificate for a free shotgun with every SUV or pick up purchased. The president of the dealership says it was just marketing to likely customers. The certificates were good at a local gun-shop, which did the background checks under the law.

    November 1
    In England, a high-speed train from London to Manchester was grounded because the wiper blades were loose. It was raining, and the train could not proceed until the wipers were working again. So a conductor addressed the passengers: "If anyone has some nuts and bolts with them will they come forward?" Several passengers obliged, and one even climbed on the engine and tried to fix the wipers with no success. In the end, 500 passengers had to disembark and wait for the next train.

  • Jenny
  • Luke
  • Scott
  • Tifani
  • Chelsie
  • Powered by Blogger