It takes a heart of stone not to laugh at Liberals, who are like High School football stars going back 50 years to their glory days while the oppression of the press under Obama.
A journalist asks those involved in the new film, "The Post," some obvious questions:
//For example, he reminded Streep and Spielberg that President Barack Obama flexed his might against journalists via the Espionage Act. Here’s how Jake Tapper put it:
“The Obama administration has used the Espionage Act to go after whistleblowers who leaked to journalists … more than all previous administrations combined.”
That doesn’t take into account Obama’s war against Fox News or how he spied on Fox News’ James Rosen.
How did Streep and Spielberg, hardcore Democrats who supported Obama during his two presidential terms, react? Let’s just say each has a potent political career awaiting them given their fancy footwork.
Here’s Asi’s corker:
“If you look at the numbers, there were more prosecutions under the Espionage Act during the Obama administration than any other administration. Yet no one in Hollywood was urged to say something about it, or do something about it…”
How did Spielberg answer?
He didn’t. He dodged the question entirely, rambling on about how Daniel Ellsberg, the key source behind The Pentagon Papers’ acquisition, wanted to stop the Vietnam War. Or something. Watch the clip yourself and see if his answer even remotely addresses the question (start at the 7:35 mark).
What about Streep?
The video doesn’t directly connect the question and answer, although given Streep’s response it’s apparent she’s attempting to answer it without actually doing so.
“I think it’s good that that is exposed now. I think we have to hold not only people that we have adversarial political views from to task but I think we also have to hold our friends and our compatriots, people who follow a line of policy that we agree with, we have to hold them to the same standard. I think that’s absolutely valid and important. And that’s sort of what the film is about.”
Asi asked a tough, but fair, question to these A-list stars. He deserves plenty of credit for that … even if the stars couldn’t fairly fire off a response.//
Showing posts with label Washington Post. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Washington Post. Show all posts
Saturday, December 30, 2017
Labels:
Hollywood and History,
Washington Post
Tuesday, November 15, 2016
Why would anyone think this was a good idea?
Put aside the tired "men objectifying women" rhetoric, how does a gag that is essentially a stripper make sense at anything other than a bachelor party?
Perhaps because they are out of touch elitist who know that they can't be sexists so they really lack anything resembling good taste?
The fact that it happened at the Washington Post is just an added delight.
Put aside the tired "men objectifying women" rhetoric, how does a gag that is essentially a stripper make sense at anything other than a bachelor party?
Perhaps because they are out of touch elitist who know that they can't be sexists so they really lack anything resembling good taste?
The fact that it happened at the Washington Post is just an added delight.
Labels:
The Liberal War on Women,
Washington Post
Thursday, January 07, 2016
The nice thing about having a Democrat in the White House is that there is never any bad news...
...but, occasionally, the media does report about things that were "unexpected" when the President used his magic powers to roll back the seas.
Put on your surprised face.
Washington Post admits that, no: electric cars were NOT worth it.
...but, occasionally, the media does report about things that were "unexpected" when the President used his magic powers to roll back the seas.
Put on your surprised face.
Washington Post admits that, no: electric cars were NOT worth it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)