
I remember when I first went to a Passion conference and heard Louie Giglio speak (for those of you who don't know what Passion, it's a conference/music movement with worship greats David Crowder, Chris Tomlin, Chris Tomlin, and Matt Redman). Mr. Giglio said, "I used to think that Jesus died upon the cross for me. I used to think that when Jesus was up on the cross, that he was just thinking about me. I was taught that he was probably whispering my name as he hung from the cross, and one of his first words as a baby might have been Louie..."
And then Louie did something that makes sermons exciting. He used the word "But". He had set everyone in the room up with a thought with which they were all familiar. And then he uses "but" to indicate that there is a better, more exciting thought that will superseded everything he just said. He went on to say, "But then I realized that Jesus died for the glory of the God. Jesus' death was not about me. It was about God." True, all true.
However, I spent the next year or so scowling whenever a preacher would talk about Jesus dying on the cross for me. And it wasn't until somebody quoted Romans 5:8, "God demonstrates his own love for us in this, that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us," that I realized that the first part of Louie's sermon was still true. Louie's new revelation about Jesus' death didn't have to cancel out another truth. It could have just added to it.
I think it's important that when we speak, that we use the word "and" to describe new bits of thought or revelation instead of "but". That way we can include what we learned before as we embrace a potentially new or shocking idea. During the next few blogs, I will be exploring various places where people have used the word "but" instead of "and". Hopefully in the process, I can use the word "and" instead of "but" to express my ideas.





