Whenever I experience a significant event, I will blog about it. This time, it's no exception. With my last paper over (H3 physics), this marks the end of my 2 years at rj, and of course the end of the much dreaded a levels, and i finally see the light at the end of the tunnel! my future lies ahead, as i shall embrace the limitless possibilities of all that i can do now...
this a level exams must be the longest exams i'll ever take, and one in which i spent the longest preparing for (6 years in IP), and the longest i spent mugging for (at least two full months, and random mugging in between in the last 6 months). 3 whole weeks of exams, out of which only 12 days had papers (13 papers in total). so there's like more than half the time for mugging which is very good haha, but just prolongs the agony and all. i'm still glad for the extra time to mug though, may have helped slightly?
looking back, mugging last minute really doesn't help for a levels. what helps is everything you've been doing the past two years. a lot of the knowledge i had to use ended up coming from long-term memory and crapping skills, as many qns involved explanations and application of what we have learnt to new situations, which i didn't quite expect.
seriously, i expected a levels to be as easy as the stuff in the tys, but looks like a levels standards changed towards less memorising and rote-learning, and more application of skills. well it's good for ppl who are pro, but im not very pro, so it's not very good for me haha. i just hope i lie within the band of proness (ie. A A A A A!) but now that it's over, there's only
the wait.i shall give a -brief- account of how each paper went for me. maybe after i get back my results next year, i can look at this blog post and check if how i felt about the paper = how i did for each paper xD
By chronological order (or thereabouts, since each paper is spread out over 3 weeks):
Mathematicsthe paper was odd. when i saw the first question and couldn't do it, i was shocked. it was our first paper, and it was already like that!? but afterwards i read the question again and kindof understood what they were asking and yeah, it was ok. i didn't know how to do the graphs qn, and i left it to the end and just did what i thought should be right. seems like it's correct (according to solutions posted online by math tutors haha, ask me if you want the solutions).
a whole lot more explaining than expected. qns were phrased weirdly too, probably to make it look more difficult, and trick weaker students into freaking out and giving up on the paper (which i almost wanted to but of course i didn't). turns out math is going to be the best paper among all my a level exams, so see how much worse things are going to turn out...
should be an A. according to solutions, i got almost everything correct (i lost 2 marks for sure, a few more uncertain marks for explanations), provided i didn't make careless mistakes. even if the solutions weren't accurate, it should still be an A...
General PaperPaper 1 was good in that there was a question on poverty! yay! but my intro was crap and i don't even think i wrote a proper thesis statement. i had too many points and i was squeezing everything in, so i think that wasn't good. but my points were good, so should have quite a bit of content marks. it should be at least a B essay, hopefully A because paper 2 was crap. i died for the compre. ):
i didn't know what they were asking for in half the qns, bcos it was mostly inference/why u think the author used quotation marks (WHYY??!?!?)/explain weird stuff that involves weird crapping skills. thus, i am absolutely unsure about the validity of my answers and if i'm lucky, all my answers would = answer sheet. if im unlucky, i'm going to get a horrid grade T.T oh and i didn't know how to do the vocab, and my aq was crap, my summary was useless and only had 7 big points (and there were 8 marks!)
worst cast scenario: B4 (better not be anything below a B :/). best case scenario: A2 (impossible to get A1 with such a crappy compre right, unless everyone else had crappier compres)
Economicsargh essay was horrifying. just thinking about it makes me shudder. i didn't know how to do some part of every single one of the six questions, and you know how horrifying that is in the biggest exam (as of now) of your life??? i randomly chose the 25 mark micro qn bcos i had two points (kindof), but it's a 25 mark essay!! i probably failed it :/
i then chose the first two macro qns because i didn't study globalisation well so i couldn't do the apparently quite easy qn on globalisation, but the part a was difficult so there! i would have screwed up that part. i hope i passed both essays, though i think i did badly for some parts of both questions ):
if i had more time, and if i were thinking more clearly, i should have chosen the qn on price discrimination. i thought up quite a few good points for it after the paper, and i think i can get a L2 score and probably pass the essay at least, which is already better than the 25 mark qn T.T i was panicking throughout the paper and not thinking very clearly, plus it was just too cold in the hall!!
case study was much much better, at least i knew how to do most of it, and guess what? i wrote more than i did for essay, AND i drew more diagrams! while they tested on random weird stuff like the multiplier, it was doable and it was like giveaway points! (they probably repented after the killer essay paper haha). pretty much everyone predicted the high oil/food/energy prices! apparently some jc's prelim paper predicted 90% of the a level paper or something, so those ppl who did the paper, lucky you.
but the last parts (e,f) for both micro and macro case studies weren't very good because i had too many points and i lacked time. oh yeah why in the world did they give us so many parts ah, and make me write so much for like what 2 marks, 3 marks! gah wasted my time, could have done better for last parts hmph.
worst case: S? raw score is probably a S for essay ahaha, so ironic, considering i have never gotten below D for econs before (which should warrant an A for a levels according to everyone but yeah life is not a bed of roses). best case is a B. with essay score 60% and case study only 40%, it's impossible to get A raw score, and unlikely to get A moderated score. :/
Chemistryi feel cheated after i finished all three papers. like half of what i learnt in the past two years were actually NOT tested? i touched the calculator like twice for paper 2/paper 3??? and there were a whole lot of explanations and qualitative answers, which tested on stuff that we haven't learnt before really, but must apply what we know to the paper. bcos of the time limit, i didn't have time to slowly think, and so some of my explanations must have been crap. sigh.
papers 2 and 3 were ok ba, but it wasn't very good because i know i made quite a few mistakes, and since the papers were pretty easy, everyone will do better than me and i can't get my A :/ paper 1 was more difficult, and
very very tricky. i was rushing because i always don't have enough time to do chem mcq papers (ask our chem department. they like to kill us for chem), and because of that, i fell into the cambridge examiners' traps again and again and i made a whole lot of mistakes that i seriously SHOULND'T HAVE MADE. while i had time to go back and check and salvage some of them, i missed out on the rest et voila! i had a lot of mistakes, and while im sure many people make the same mistakes, does this put me ahead of others?
predicted score: possibly a B, of course hope for A
PhysicsThis paper ah, why start so late ah. when we did the first paper (paper 2), it was alrd near the end of the second week of exams? bio ppl alrd took like their paper one week ago? then when we took the second paper (paper 3), some of the arts students already completed their a level exams?!?! gah. the wait for the third paper (paper 1) was the longest la. i totally didn't study for it, except the afternoon before just to recap and make me feel less nervous about not mugging for it >.> spent most of the time mugging for h3 physics (more below haha)
paper 2 and 3 were pretty easy i guess, but so much more explaining than expected. and all those definitions (of tesla?! of the volt!!) luckily they've appeared somewhere in our notes before, but i forgot the definitions and i was making them up/deriving them on the spot XP
paper 1 was DIFFICULT. everyone was probably expecting a easy paper, but from my experience previously with chem mcq, i knew paper 1 was bound to be difficult. but who knew it was going to be so difficult! i mean it's doable, but i probably had quite a lot of wrong answers ): it was like more difficult than our prelims paper, and comparable to any prelim papers actually. i always thought a levels was supposed to be easier than prelims T.T
some of the qns were simple enough, they didn't bother tricking you, but those qns were the minority. the rest were plenty of tedious calculations/weird stuff i nv heard of before which makes me wonder what i've actually been learning the past two years. how could there be stuff like CENTRIFUGAL FORCE when we never even seen it in our notes before. bah.
hopefully it's an A. at least everyone else dies with me, and hopefully i did better than most ppl ^^"
H3 Physicsi mugged quite a bit for it, but only in the few days before. i felt awfully under-prepared when i went into the exam hall, because the syllabus is made up of new unfamiliar and unknown stuff that i've only had the chance to memorise, and not internalise. i could rmb the eqns, but if they ask me to do all the explaining and deriving, i freak out and forget. that's kinda what happened today.
i expected the paper to be difficult, from past year papers and stuff, and it turned out pretty much the same. i couldn't show this eqn, and im still really upset about it. i should have worked backwards but i was so focused on getting it from first principles that i gave up on it when i couldn't get it. bah. 4 marks gone. a lot of explanations too; i didn't know some of them and pretty much made up based on whatever concept i believed it to be based on. so a lot of uncertain marks that could have been lost/gained.
then for section b, i had to choose 2 qns out of 4. i chose one qn that was obviously easier than the rest, as i couldn't do like 4-10 marks in each of the other 3 qns (and each qn was 20 marks!), so i had to randomly choose. after i did the second qn, i realised i couldn't do quite a lot of it T.T
when i got home today and worked out the other 2 qns i didn't do, i realised i could do like 6 marks of showing for one of the qns after all! though it required quite a bit of thinking and stuff which i may not be able to produce in exam conditions, but still. sigh.
oh well, nothing i can do to change it. not like i'll change my decision in those conditions, i was kindof freaking out bcos i didn't have much time to choose anymore, and i was alrd demoralised by the first part of the paper ):
possibly a merit grade, but let's hope it's a distinction.
All in all, GCE 'A' Level examinations proved to be more challenging than expected, and don't underestimate the meanness of the cambridge examiners! I think because of all the complaints and feedback that a levels were too easy, that students just needed to mug and memorise to score well, the examiners have decided to set questions that test more than just calculations/rote-learning, and differentiate between the good students and the average.
the awful thing is that i know i made some mistake in every single paper i did (except gp essay?), which made it worse because i couldn't even live in ignorant bliss that i did well for the papers. i mean just having some mistakes doesn't mean i did badly, but because of the few mistakes, u will think that you could have done better and avoided a worse grade! maybe if i get b -choy choy touch wood- i will regret it in the future, because i could have answered the qn correctly and maybe get a A instead!
i guess it's possible that all my complaints were overly pessimistic and i'll turn out with perfect scores, but i guess i'd rather pin my hopes on how i feel about the papers than on overly optimistic scores and end up badly disappointed.