Tuesday, December 24, 2024

TSO
Christmas Eve/Sarajevo 12/24

Monday, December 23, 2024

DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas Says Child Trafficking Across Southern Border is Not His Responsibility

In an interview with Margaret Brennan of Face The Nation, Mayorkas was asked about the 32,000 unaccompanied children who have entered the United States between 2019 and 2023. According to Donald Trump’s incoming border czar Tom Homan, these children are being exploited and trafficked for criminal entreprises.

Margaret, we certainly have received reports of children being trafficked, even those as to whom we know where they are. That is outside the responsibility of the Department of Homeland Security.

What we do is we turn children over within 72 hours, as the law requires, to the Department of Health and Human Services, and then HHS places those children.

Of course, we investigate cases of trafficking, but there are children who are reunited with a parent here in the United States or a legal guardian, and they move and sometimes the government loses track.

Individuals do not comply with the reporting obligations or otherwise, I think it is inaccurate to say that all of them are trafficked or victimized. There are a number of reasons why we might lose track of an individual that is not necessarily specific to this administration.      

That has been a long standing challenge in the immigration system, one example of why that system is so broken, why the duration of time in proceedings is unacceptably long and has to be remedied. Remember, we’re dealing with a system that was last reformed in 1996.

GRTWT

THIS IS THE STRANGEST THING I HAVE EVER SEEN

Footage of the burning of the woman in the NYC subway yesterday.

I do not know what I am looking at.

No One Is Blinder Than He Who Will Not See

ANOTHER DISGUSTING MIGRANT CRIME! Horrific Video Shows Man Sitting on Bench Watching Woman Burn to Death After He Lit Her on Fire in NYC Subway

WHY IS THIS PERSON HERE?

Guatemalan Migrant Arrested For Immolating Sleeping Woman on New York Subway (GRAPHIC VIDEO)

Ode To Joy

Sunday, December 22, 2024

Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo Withdraw From UN Net Zero Banking Alliance To Such On The Global Warming Cockpipe

 

I guess they finally came to their senses and realized the UN's cockpipe tastes like China's asshole.

Since April 2021, 145 banks in 44 countries with more than $73 trillion in assets have joined NZBA, tripling membership in three years. 

"In April 2021 when NZBA launched, no bank had set a science-based sectoral 2030 target for its financed emissions using 1.5°C scenarios," it says. "Today, over half of NZBA banks have set such targets."

There are two less on the list.

Goldman Sachs was the first to withdraw from the alliance this month, ESG Today reported. Wells Fargo was the second, announcing its departure Friday. 

The banks withdrew two years after 19 state attorneys general launched an investigation into them and four other institutions, Bank of America, Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase and Morgan Stanley, for alleged deceptive trade practices connected to ESG. 

Four states led the investigation: Arizona, Kentucky, Missouri and Texas. Others involved include Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Virginia. Five state investigations aren't public for confidentiality reasons. 

The investigation was the third launched by Texas AG Ken Paxton into deceptive trade practices connected to ESG, which he argues were designed to negatively impact the Texas oil and natural gas industry. The industry is the lifeblood of the Texas economy and major economic engine for the country and world, The Center Square has reported. 

The Texas oil and natural gas industry accounts for nearly one-third of Texas's GDP and funds more than 10% of the state's budget.

Coastguardsmen Report Being Followed By Fleet of 12 to 30 Drones

What began as a routine patrol quickly turned into an unsettling encounter, leaving many sailors demanding answers—and respect.

A member of the Coast Guard, speaking anonymously to The New York Post, expressed outrage over the administration’s flippant dismissal of their firsthand experiences.

“It’s the implication that’s insulting,” the Guardsman said. “It’s implying we’re making sh-t up, when the ones making up sh-t are down in Washington, D.C.”

The alleged incident involved a fleet of 12 to 30 drones shadowing a 47-foot Coast Guard rescue vessel during a patrol of the Atlantic Ocean.

According to the sailor, the drones appeared suddenly around 9 p.m., maintained a steady pace with the vessel cruising at 20 knots, and maneuvered in a way no commercial aircraft could.

“I’m terrible with measurements, but [the swarm] was about 80 to 100 feet above us. They had four propellers. Seven feet across. The flashing lights, like you’ve seen. The festive green, red, and white lights.”    

“Commercial airplanes don’t move like that,” he said. “I’ve been out there [on the water] when planes were coming in for landings in New York, and trust me, you can tell the difference. We’re not idiots, we know what drones look and sound like.”

GRTWT

Jethro Tull
Ring Out These Bells (Solstice Bells)

Saturday, December 21, 2024

Suspect in Terror Attack on German Christmas Market is Saudi Activist Who Helped Migrants Flee to Germany — Once Featured in BBC Interview Renouncing Islam

The suspect in the Magdeburg terror attack is understood to be a migrant from Saudi Arabia by the name of Taleb Al-Abdulmohsen.

While details about the killer's identity are still being investigated, Taleb Al-Abdulmohsen was reportedly granted asylum in Germany in 2016 after fleeing from his native Saudi Arabia because he longer believed in Islam.

In an interview with the BBC back in 2019, Taleb explained how he had set up a website to help people flee Gulf states such as Saudi Arabia and move to Germany.

"Hi, my name's Taleb," he said in the video currently circulating across social media. "I'm from Saudi Arabia. I'm an activist. I created a website to help people seeking asylum, especially from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf region."

Some of my own considerations:

1. Vehicular jihad is a well-established practice going back years. ISIS has called for it. It is not a common practice among any other criminal or terrorist sector.

2. Saudi Arabia, where the Magdeburg perpetrator is from, is a hotbed of jihad activity.

3. Islam has doctrines calling for warfare against unbelievers. See Qur’an 8:39, 9:5, 9:29, etc. etc.

4. Islam has doctrines calling for deception under certain circumstances. See here: jihadwatch.org/2022/06/niger-

5. Jihad groups have been calling for attacks on German Christmas Markets.

6. Several jihad plots against Christmas Markets have already been foiled.

7. Muslims recently marched through a German Christmas market screaming “Allahu akbar” and “There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his prophet.”

8. It seems that the perp has been claiming to be an ex-Muslim — and a Zionist! — and has contacted several anti-jihad media figures, asking them to interview him. This leads to several possibilities.

a. That he was a sincere ex-Muslim and Zionist, and decided to attack a target of jihadis in a manner in which jihadis often attack, for no clear reason.

b. He was lying, in preparation for his jihad attack.

c. He was a genuine ex-Muslim, but in a moment of personal crisis returned to Islam, and realized that he had to do a great deed to outweigh his apostasy on Allah’s big judgment scales (Qur’an 21:47). Muhammad teaches that no deed is greater than jihad, so he went for a jihad attack.

d. Or alternatively, he just snapped, has some psychotic episode, etc. In that case it’s noteworthy that his desire to seek “revenge” led him to emulate a common practice of the warriors of the religion he professed to have left.

Of those four possibilities, the first one is the least likely. Why? Because if he was an ex-Muslim who went mad, he would be much more likely to have targeted Muslims, rather than choosing a favored target of the very jihadis he despised. The establishment media will be insisting that he is an ex-Muslim and never consider the possibility of deception or a return to Islam. That’s because they don’t know about those possibilities and because they always do whatever they can to distance Islam from the violence done in its name and in accord with its teachings. But their claims in this case are quite flimsy.

Dr. Byram W. Bridle Returns To His Office After 3 1/2 Years of Banishment From University For Being Right About COVID Vaccines

It has been 3 years, 4 months, and 23 days (1,243 total days) and I am finally back in my office at the university that employs me. I was banished from my workspaces almost 3.5 years ago following a radio interview in which I expressed concerns about the systemic biodistribution of COVID-19 shots throughout the body. I disclosed scientific data that aligned with the long history of lipid nanoparticle technology, but contrasted with the dominant global narrative that existed at that time. My ‘controversial statements’ are now well-accepted facts in the scientific literature.

In response, some of my colleagues participated in a well-coordinated global defamation campaign against me. I found myself the target of chronic harassment that has not ceased to this day. Rather than tackle my message, they chose to repeatedly attack the messenger. 

I sought some kind of restoration of formerly productive working relationships with four of these colleagues. Instead, they formally expressed feelings of fear should I be allowed to be anywhere in their vicinity. This purported fear was initially limited to the university campus boundary, and then shrunk to the building housing my office and laboratory, despite only two of the four complainants being in that building. 

I was prohibited from accessing my workspaces due to ‘feelings’ expressed by my colleagues. Their feelings were catered to; mine, which were based on experiencing tangible and chronic harassment were ignored. Campus and municipal police investigated the situation and consultants were hired by the university to conduct further investigations. 

Every report (or summary thereof) that I have seen has concluded that I never represented a ‘real and present danger’ to my colleagues. They even state that the complainants themselves have admitted that I never presented as a ‘real and present danger’. In fact, documentary evidence that I have seen shows that at least one of them amplified their actions against me with an intent to drive me to the point of such frustration that I would feel compelled to contact the police for help. 

You know that a person is feigning fear of the bear when they make it their goal to keep poking the bear until a negative reaction is elicited. 

As a consequence of my colleagues making their request to have their feelings appeased I was banished from my laboratory and office for 3.5 years. In recognition of the fact that I never presented as a ‘real and present danger’, my banishment has officially been deemed to be a ‘non-disciplinary’ action. But my research program has now been utterly destroyed and I have suffered irreparable harm to my professional reputation. So, if this was ‘non-disciplinary’, I would hate to see what ‘discipline’ would have looked like. 

So, I now have access again to my office. However, and remarkably, I am still not allowed to enter my laboratory. Don’t ask me why because I have yet to be presented with a rationale, especially when everyone that has been consulted has defined me to be a non-threat. Even now, I cannot fully commit to initiating the rebuild of my research program. I had a bad experience after obtaining funding when I was told (for the umpteenth time) one year ago that the return to my lab was imminent. I was accused by my administration of failing to conduct the research that I had proposed to do. This was dropped when I explained that I did not conduct the research that I had promised to do because the administration would not allow me to do the research that I had intended to conduct because they had banished me from my lab. They agreed that it seemed unreasonable to expect me to perform the research when I was not allowed to perform my research. After this utterly ridiculous scenario played out there was agreement that I should not even seek more funding until I find myself physically present in my lab again; so that wait continues.

GRTWT

Big News! Nissan Is Ending A LOT of Woke Policies

High School In San Diego County Holds Gay Seance, Apparently, Part of Their Normal Curriculum

Friday, December 20, 2024

Man From Saudi Arabia Plows Through a German Christmas Market at a Very High Speed, Sending People Flying Like Bowling Pins, Killing an Unknown Number

From Ace:

Again.

This happens every year.

I know how to stop it -- ban the AfD! Stop them from spreading their Nazi rhetoric about unassimilatable hostile foreigners waging a guerilla warfare campaign against the native population and making life unlivable!

Whatever you do, don't ask any questions about immigration!

EXACTLY! Thank You For Saying It, Elon