I figure I'm safe. No one really sees this blog and
since I usually review the positives, it leaves me with
a bit of unvented spleen with no where to go when I read books that tank. In my personal opinion anyway.
I just read the latest B.A.D. book by Sherrilyn Kenyon except it wasn't truly written by Sherrilyn. A Co-author by the name of Dianna Love helped out.
I like B.A.D. books as I've read quite a few. I wish Ms. Love had done so as well.
If it weren't for it being a library book, I would have thrown this book against a wall, several times in fact. I'm just glad I didn't have to shell out very hard earned money for this experience. Gas is expensive!
Where do I start?
Terri Mitchell is the star in this story and she's a tarnished little chit.
She is supposed to have been a cop. She recovered from a harrowing ordeal that left her partner dead and herself sliced up with a very sharp knife. She was recruited by B.A.D. and I was never clear why?
What in the world did she have that they wanted? Wasn't brains. And she didn't know enough. Was it just the 'in' of being there where they wanted to investigage anyway?
I did not like Terri. I did not feel sympathetic towards her, I didn't connect to her and in fact, the character fell flat. Carlos, one of the better B.A.D. agents is emasculated...he does a bit of growling and posturing but they let Terri get away with stupidity by blaming it on her inability to 'trust' her superiors.
How can an agent not trust Joe or Tee? For goodness sakes!!
OH yes, they 'might' have been infiltrated too. She doesn't ever call for back up, she's careless, and refuses a partner. She walks into things thinking she knows what she's doing because she's been 'trained' but the only thing I saw throughout this book is that she needs a whole year's worth of more training just so she won't be a danger to herself, never mind anyone else counting on her.
Nathan Drake's character had potential. That is, until he hooked up with Terri.
He ADMIRED her? Thought she was dedicated, clever and a professional and her stubborness was an asset? Give me a break! Her refusal to use back up , her refusal to use B.A.D. technology and expertise made her seem weak, foolish and inaffective.
I was basically yelling at the book, 'Get over yourself already!'.
But of course, she never did.
Even the demise of Sammy, in a most horrifying way, totally left me untouched. Sure the description was graphic and gross, just like the virus was supposed to be. And that was well written from a tech standpoint. But I never connected with Sammy to feel for the character...to BE shocked and/or saddened. I never connected on the emotional level. Sammy was a Star Trek Red Shirt...expendable card board character or cannon fodder.
The villains. Predictible. Seriously, I figured out who the bad guy was and wasn't surprised who his accomplice ended up being.
This book just didin't do it for me in any way or fashion. Which is too bad because the series of agents that Sherrilyn has created have all been alpha, hard core, and very gripping heros. This one was a wimp.
OH, don't think that I don't believe woman can't be badass agents. Suzanne Brockmann writes some seriously awesome female agents or women who become agents and no where have they acted like Terri. Alyssa Locke (
Gone Too Far) would have mowed over Terri while ripping her a new one for the decisions Terri made in the field.
Terri Vs. Alyssa. It would have been a TKO. And I can imagine Sam Starrett congratuating Alyssa with a passion that was sorely lacking in
Phantom in the Night. Yes, this is a very negative review. A diatribe if you will. I believe my ire stems from the fact that I admire Sherrilyn Kenyon. She's written an amazing volume of worth with a reputation that delivers. And this one let me down so much, I am mad, angry and disgusted.
Will I buy another book? Yes. But it will be a Dark Hunter. Those have yet to dissappoint.